JMP Wish List

mgerusdurand · ‎12-06-2022

Hello, Having the possibility to choose range shown on Y axis in graph builder would be great! when you have data on a wide range it is not nice to have them flattened because you have to show all data on Y. Thanks in advance, Marie

jthi · ‎12-06-2022

Add some way to easily see the name of toolbars. Currently I think I have enable/disable toolbars until I notice which one has disappeared. It would be helpful to have toolbar name visible for example by hovering over the re-order part of toolbar similarly as tool tips are displayed for toolbar items. Or maybe highlighting the toolbar name if right-click is pressed on top of it is enough This isn't yet a real issue, but if I ever start adding many toolbars to JMP, I could see not easily seeing the toolbar name as a fairly annoying thing.

egon_gross · ‎12-02-2022

As an user, running JMP since version 9 and upgrading to JMPPRO some years ago, I'm always disapointed to shut down JMP complet while some - possible erroneous - big calculations are done and the programm is not responding and I have the urge to stop the software performing my false commands. A possibility to safe the last modifications in the opened data table would be realy helpful. As the session log was introduced with version 17, I wonder if that might be feasible using this new, wonderful feature. Or to introduce somethimg like a configurable "auto safe" in order not to loos to many modifications/ steps.

MShroff · ‎12-02-2022

Hello, When saving / closing a JMP project, it would be helpful to allow using locally set preferences instead of the global ones (where the two sets are different). Subsequently, when the project is re-opened, it should open with the local preferences. Thanks and regards Mehul Shroff

Steffen_Bugge · ‎12-01-2022

Is it possible to add an open text field to the Define tab in Easy DoE, so that the problem you are trying to solve can be stated? Perhaps this also could be included on the top of the report tab? This would make it possible to connect the designs to different projects, teams, purposes or other reasons.

Steffen_Bugge · ‎12-01-2022

Under the analyze tab, in the new Easy DOE platform, there is a plot using red/green to describe if factors are included in the model or not. I suggest that it should be possible to get this plot outside of the Easy DOE platform.

idouglas · ‎11-30-2022

I am trying to complete an analysis of a dataset which is likely confounded by immortal time bias – some patients died during follow up resulting in them not be eligible for the study intervention. Survival analysis with time-varying covariates is the recommended solution and I understand that it is implemented in SAS with PROC PHREG (There’s a similar approach in the coxph module for R). Per JMP product developers and @JerryFish "PROC PHREG does it in two ways. Neither are doable in JMP https://go.documentation.sas.com/doc/en/pgmsascdc/9.4_3.4/statug/statug_phreg_examples07.htm The first approach requires computational effort at run time, i.e. changing data at run time. This is not possible in Fit Proportional Hazard. The second approach requires two response columns, which is not allowed in Fit Proportional Hazard. Since all my analyses are completed in JMP enhanced functionality would be most helpful.

hogi · ‎11-30-2022

☐ cool new feature ☑ could help many users! ☑ removes a „bug“ ☐ nice to have ☐ nobody needs it Workflow Builder just records part of the steps which a user performs in Jmp. Especially commands from Add-ins are not recorded. My wish: Enable Workflow Builder to record as many actions as possible. Options: Provide an easy way for Add-In Programmers to make the add-ins "suitable" to be recorded via Workflow Builder. add a functionality to workflow builder to record the actions of existing add-ins (without adjustment within the Add-In) add the steps as Main Menu("Add-Ins: command") - i.e. not fully automatic, but with some user interaction add a dummy step to the workflow idicating that Workflow Builder was not able to grab an action (then the user can decide if this action was important and just in case try to re-do it using an official function) https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Workflow-Builder-Add-Ins/m-p/573991/highlight/true#M78301 more wishes submitted by

ErraticAttack · ‎11-29-2022

It would be quite convenient if JMP allowed the Substitute() function to have an optional argument such as Substitute( ...., First Occurrence( 1 ) ) . This will help when passing arguments into a function by reference. Consider the following: some function = Function( {_function, _args}, {Default Local}, function = Name Expr( _function ); Eval( Substitute( _args, {}, Expr( function ) ) ) ); other function = Function( {_1, _2, _3 = "optional"}, Show( _1, _2, _3 ) ); some function( Name Expr( other function ), {1, 2, 3} ); /* OUTPUT _1 = 1; _2 = 2; _3 = 3; */ some function( Name Expr( other function ), {1, {2, 4}, 3} ); /* EXPECTED OUTPUT _1 = 1; _2 = {2, 4}; _3 = 3; */ Here in the first function I am calling a referenced function with a given argument list. The problem is that the Subsitute() replaces all lists with the function call, instead of the outer one only. This is where it would be nice to substitute only the first occurrence of the List() expression.

shampton82 · ‎11-29-2022

I'd like to suggest the ability to have all of the drop down options for cell/summary statistic labeling to be shown in graph builder. Currently you can only have one on at a time. I usually want to have a summary statistic and the count of at the same time and the caption box options does not always work as needed (either by format or the way the statistic compiles). So for example on a mosaic plot I could have label by value, %, and count all active on the chart. For bar charts, I'd like to have any number of the summary statistics available to show on the chart. This would reflect the way the caption box now works in JMP17. Thanks for considering this request. Steve

hogi · ‎11-27-2022

☐ cool new feature ☐ could help many users! ☐ removes a „bug“ ☑ nice to have ☐ nobody needs it There is a bug in Substitute if several items are substituted simultaneously or sequentially in a JSL code. JMP complains that the code is not correct. The code works after feeding it through parse(char(my code)). And it works as well if the file is saved and re-opened: https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Col-Median-what-s-wrong/m-p/573778#M78278 really strange.

hogi · ‎11-25-2022

☑ cool new feature ☑ could help many users! ☐ removes a „bug“ ☐ nice to have ☐ nobody needs it #myTop10_2022 Please add this functionality to JSL editor: When a user Double-Clicks a bracket, the code inside the brackets is analyed, clustered ind highlighted with differnet colors. Example for "if": - conditions are highlighted green to separate the code blocks in-between - else code is highlighted red to separate is from the other code https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/JSL-if-else-gt-find-the-commas/m-p/573510/highlight/true#M78251 Similar highlighting could also be applied to many other functions: Match: highlight each match to separate the code blocks. Substitute: highlight the search patterns to separate the replacement blocks ... more wishes submitted by

hogi · ‎11-24-2022

https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/linked-data-table-how-to-cut-the-quot-link-quot/m-p/573180#M78213 Summary Tables and Subsets have an option to "link" the new table to the original data table. "Data views" have such a link enabled by default. Cool: Row Selections and changes to the values are automatically linked between the tables. But sometimes one needs to remove such a link - to add additional rows to the main table - edit entries in the columns which were used for summary grouping - to rename columns of the linked table ... my wish: remove the link via right click on and click on a command like "cut the link". workarounds: - generate a (100%) subset of the linked table and delete the linked table itself - a Links cannot be saved, so, one can save the tables, close both tables and open the "linked" table again - without the link. more wishes submitted by

ThomasDickel · ‎11-23-2022

In some addins I have written (currently using JMP 16.2) I am storing user preferences in a file inside the addin folder. On the other side there are these PFS files which JMP uses itself to store its settings and preferences. I think it would be a great idea to have some JSL commands to store preferences and settings in PFS files - much alike the PFS files are used in e.g. JSL-Hamcrest. These addin-generated preference files should be persistent, so that an addin update does not remove the PFS file. Example of an PFS file which e,g, JMP and JSL-Hamcrest does use: Example Preferences( GUI Location( "Bottom" ), Use Markup( 1 ), Show Embedded Log( 1 ) ) The PFS files store are as I have seen all data types as Strings, Numbers, List, Matrix, ... The preference file should be loaded from the addin by its filename: load preferences("<addin-path>\user-preferences.PFS") To get a preference value we call a function to load the value (String, Number, List, Matrix,...) get preference( "Use Markup" ) // => 1 For setting the preference value we call a function to set the value (String, Number, List, Matrix,...) set preference( "Use Markup" ) = 0 After addin usage the preference file should be saved back: save preferences("<addin-path>\user-preferences.PFS") It would be helpful if you can add this fucntionality to the next JMP/JSL version.

MShroff · ‎11-22-2022

Hello, For Fit Y by X Bivariate analysis, can preferences be added to provide confidence intervals for the slope / intercept / R^2 by default? Currently, it requires extra steps through the sub-menus to get this information. Thanks and regards Mehul Shroff

MShroff · ‎11-22-2022

Hello, I would like to request an enhancement of the Life Distribution dialog. Similar to what's available in Fit Life b X, can the Life Distribution dialog offer the user a choice of what fit / scale they want to start with? Currently, it defaults to non-parametric and requires additional steps to change to something else. This can take up a lot of time if the dataset is large. Thanks and regards Mehul Shroff

MShroff · ‎11-22-2022

Hello, I would like to request that the Fix Mixture command in Life Distribution be enhanced to enable JMP to fit the data with the best mixture possible as an initial / default option. The user can then choose to do something different if they prefer. Thanks and regards Mehul Shroff

Victor_G · ‎11-22-2022

Hi JMP Users and JMP team, I had an old idea looking at the visual "Split history" from the Decision Tree platform (see image "Split_history" attached), and thinking about this visualisation for DoE models created by the "Fit Model" or "Fit Stepwise" platforms. Would it be possible and feasible to add in these platform (or in one of these platforms) a similar graph showing the evolution of different models metrics (like R², R² adjusted, RMSE, p-value of the model, ... perhaps to be chosen/selected by the user) in order to help the user define the best possible model (perhaps as an option in the red triangle like "Split history") ? It could be a sort of graph, that updates each time the user deletes a term from the model or add one, and that shows the result of this step on different metrics compared to previous models/steps, in order for the user to have an overview about how big the change may be for the model depending on the term removed/added (see for example image "DoE-Model_selection-help"). Maybe this idea would be easier to implement on the Fit Stepwise platform, as this platform already shows the step history and various metrics linked to each model (see image "DoE-Stepwise"). I share with you a datatable with an example of DoE, with various noise level on the response. In the various scripts "Table models parameters and selection ...", I saved the different metrics for each model steps, and created a profiler with various functions and desirabilities (R², R² PRESS, RMSE, etc...). The goal was to use the profiler in order to find the best possible model step. I hope this does not sound too crazy or over-complex, as I see this new feature as a good opportunity for models creator to quickly look at how terms impact their models in a simple way. The Generalized Regression platform also has a similar visualization ("Solution Path") that helps a lot decide about the model. I would be interested to get some feedback about this,

Aziza · ‎11-17-2022

There is a degradation platform, but if we want to write a report, we need all the details for each step which is provided in ICH Guideline (Poolability, Model, Model Selection, ...). It would be great if we had such a platform.

hogi · ‎11-17-2022

☑ cool new feature ☑ could help many users! ☐ removes a „bug“ ☐ nice to have ☐ nobody needs it [edited and adjusted to the new design] What inspired this wish list request? deficiency of Conditional Data Filters Conditional in this Data Filters means that "age (1)" defines the items which are displayed in "name (2)". --> cool Clearing the selection in age clears the selection in "name" -> not cool : ( What is the improvement you would like to see? Please add a control in the red triangle menu and via preferences to enable an alternative mode: !! lock childs when clear !! The new behavior: If a selection is cleared via >> the selection in child filters should not be reset anymore << (sure: the row selection should be adjusted to fit to the displayed selection) Why is this idea important? the proposed behavior has 2 modes where it can show it's advantages: A) The new lock childs when clear mode allows a very cool way of selecting rows: use a parent filter to select rows with interesting features, e.g. pass/pail = fail with "Conditional" activated, other filters will adjust accordingly e.g. batches will just shows batches with fail units select all these batches clear the filter selection for pass/fail you just filtered all batches with fail chips Once you understand the magic behind it, it's a feature you won't want to miss. This way, during exploratory data analysis, you can "stay in the flow" , just make one step after the other. No need to create a column formula with grouped Col aggregation or similar workarounds. B) Another benefit which cannot be rated high enough! It will save users hours of waiting time over the course of their working lives: The current "clear all child-selections" mode for conditional data filters results in long graph rendering times: Every time a selection is cleared, all child selections are cleared as well. No chance to restrict the plot to a subset! So, every the user has to wait dozens of seconds, or even minutes. I often work with large data sets which can just be displayed efficiently if a subset is selected (!). The current behavior of Conditional Data filters is so time consuming that I decided to deactivate it. Same for you? The lock childs when clear mode will fix the issue: With the new behavior, the user can make a "dummy" selection (just a single row), clear all the other data filters, apply a new filter and then clear the dummy selection. What an improvement! right?

JMP Wish List

Broken axis in graph builder

Add feature to see the name of toolbars on hover over / right-click

Avoiding complete shutdown while not responding

JMP Projects - Local Preferences

Easy DoE problem statment

Easy DOE feature also in the regular DOE platform

Survival analysis with time-varying covariates

Workflow Builder + AddIns

Substitute First Occurrence

Multiple labeling in graph builder for Mosaic and Bar charts

fix the bug in Substitute

🙏 optimized syntax highlighting in JSL editor

functionality to cut the connection between a linked table and the main table

Support PFS / Preferences files in JMP Addins

Bivariate - Confidence Limits for slope / intercept / R^2 etc.

Life Distribution

Life Distribution -> Fit Mixtures

DoE/Fit Model/Stepwise: Interactive visualization of models performances

Create a platform for detailed and structured analysis (based on ICH Guidline) for pharmaceutical stability analysis

different behavior of "clear" for conditional data filters