JMP Wish List

crofut · ‎03-19-2021

The ability to visualize lags would be appreciated. Assume there are two y variables plotted over time. Then a slider or maybe just a discrete lag option to visualize what lag provides a best visual alignment. This is an alternative to using the cross-product correlations in time series. And then to be able to automatically generate lagged variables of chosen lag.

PatrickGiuliano · ‎03-17-2021

I noticed the "Simulator" option under the Prediction Profiler isn't available in JMP when I am trying to model a dichotomous Y ("Pass" or "Fail") as my response on one or more continuous (or categorical) predictors. Would it be possible to develop a model simulation platform option analogous to the one currently developed/deployed for a continuous Y but instead for a categorical (e.g. Pass/Fail) response? It turns out that in many cases without having an accurate means of measuring a "failure" response, we (in certain applications in industry) are left with nothing more informative than a Pass/Fail result, and being able to explore the predictor space on that Pass/Fail rate in a simulation framework in tandem with the Prediction Profiler would be quite useful! I discussed this topic with @philramsey today and he also sees the utility for this application. Thank you!

tom_abramov · ‎03-09-2021

Sometimes I just dont want to see a point and/or exclude it from the calculations without data table rows/columns actions. The option of "Exclude/Hide data point" localy as Local data filter does will be great.

nter · ‎03-02-2021

The response screening platform, for example, produces plots where each point effectively represents summary characteristics of an x-y plot. It would be nice to see those x-y plots as a hover graphlet when users hover over each point. This could be on by default in the platform or could be a platform-specific graphlet option. https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Fit-Y-by-X-graphlet-in-response-screening-platform/m-p/363968/highlight/false#M61363 Thanks to @nascif_jmp for providing the solution.

MShroff · ‎02-11-2021

There are at least 9 different ways to calculate quantiles. JMP only supports one of them (Weibull estimate). Requesting that other options be supported and user choice allowed for selecting which option is to be invoked. Other SAS tools appear to support multiple options. Based on a 1996 paper (Hyndman and Fan, "Sample Quantiles in Statistical Packages", The American Statistician, Nov. 1996), the Unbiased Median approach is considered to be the most robust. Here are some relevant links that provide further details. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/Quantile.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantile_function https://analyse-it.com/blog/2013/2/quantiles-percentiles-why-so-many-ways-to-calculate-them Thanks and regards Mehul Shroff

CrisEB · ‎02-08-2021

Text explorer is a very exciting platform, however it doesn't seem to have the same interactivity than other JMP tools and I really missed it when creating dashboards. It would be great if the word cloud would react and change depending on the selection on the other graphs. At the moment you can only right click on a word and select rows. This allows you to see the selected rows in the other graphs, but it doesn't work the other way round. On top of that, this possibility disappears when converting the dashboard into an interactive HTML.

shampton82 · ‎01-13-2021

It would be helpful to be able to change the default # of levels for the group X binning as well as be able to save out the current binning from the graph to a new column (similar to the name selection in column).

Narayanan · ‎12-30-2020

Can we have JMP16 correct standard errors for non-normality (e.g., Satorra-Bentler correction) or use bootstrap for estimating variability and goodness of fit measures (e.g., Bollen-Stine bootstrap) in the multivariate SEM platform?

shampton82 · ‎12-18-2020

I'd like to see the ability to sort the X axis in an ascending or descending order based upon one of the levels in the overlay box. So when your right click on the X axis there would be a new selection item that would default to "all" but would list the levels from the overlay box and you could select which one to use. You'd then do your normal "order by" choice.

Matt_Kowalski · ‎12-17-2020

Issue: I am trying to stack together different analyses into a single profiler table. However, Some researchers have used different factor ranges in their experiments. When I stack the profilers together JMP uses the largest range across all the data tables for the factor settings on the bottom of the profiler. As a result, some analyses are making predictions outside the bounds of their respective experiments leading to erroneous predictions. Suggestion: It would be nice if JMP understood the factor ranges of the respective data sets which generated them so that when I combined the profilers it gives a null prediction or somehow grays out that region of the factor space that wasn’t included in the respective data table. I know there is an extrapolation warning feature being added to JMP 16 but I think it would be better to either null out the prediction or gray-out that extrapolation space.

Matt_Kowalski · ‎12-17-2020

Issue: Sometimes categoric factor settings have long names and it makes sense to change the alignment to either vertical or horizontal in the axis settings so you can see the whole name. However, when you do this on the scatterplot matrix it changes both sides of the factor settings on the x and y axes. So I can get it to look right on one axis but not the other. Suggestion: Decouple the factor axes so I can make a change to one axis while not affecting the other.

Matt_Kowalski · ‎12-17-2020

Suggestion: Build in confidence and prediction bounds in the Surface and Contour profilers and allow the user to toggle them off & on and to set the alpha values in a pane off to the side. You can use a different surface transparency on the surface profiler so you can still see the underlying shape of the prediction curve. Would be great if the confidence and prediction intervals could be integrated into the projected contour plot underneath the surface profiler and connected to the Response Grid Slider. This is super useful in explaining how a response requirement i.e. the Grid Slider intersects the prediction surface. Would be super useful in explaining to project management when "it depends" whether or not a requirement is met.

MathStatChem · ‎12-09-2020

It would be very nice if Evaluate Design allowed you to use a local data filter when evaluate a single design (single table). The use cases are: Evaluating the impact of lost design point(s) Quickly seeing evaluation of intiial and then subsequent augmented designs. I'm not suggesting you should be able to compare designs this way, this is only for rapid check of design properties for subsets of a full design table.

rwaterman · ‎12-02-2020

I would like the interactive html reports to support the surface profiler and/or 3D contour profiler. This would be very helpful for sharing results from a response surface model that are not represented well by the 2D profiler.

mark_anawis · ‎12-01-2020

I recommend adding a table of p values for Ni+1 to the Pareto Plot. This would help in statistically determining which categories in the plot to address. The details and calculations are shown in Quality Progress Nov 2020 issue pages 38-43. The article is 'Critical values for Pareto comparisons remove statistical subjectivity' by Frank Rudisill and Jim O'Connor. The calculations are on page 42. Table 3 on page 43 shows an example containing a p value for Ni+1 which could be added in part or in full to the Pareto Plot.

Piet_Hoogkamer · ‎12-01-2020

In capability analysis often only the upper part of the observed distribution is relevant. So, why not add an option to fit just the upper part? This will make the fit often much better in describing the part that matters, using e.g. a half normal distribution.

ih · ‎11-18-2020

In graph builder many variables can be added to both x and y axes to make a scatterplot matrix, but often the user only wants the bottom left triangle, as displayed in the scatterplot matrix platform. Provide an easy way to remove all of the diagonal and top right plots (or at least the data in them) so a user can recreate a scatterplot matrix but with all of the options and customizability of the graph builder platform.

blum_b_1 · ‎11-10-2020

The Multivariate platform does only accept one input list. Once the dialog is run, correlations will be calculated on all pairwise X from the input list. Similarly when adding a Scatterplot to the multivariate analysis, all pairwise scatterplots will be shown. However, in many situations there is an interest in only "correlating" and creating a scatterplot on a certain list of X variables versus another list of X (or Y) variables in terms of exploratory data analysis. Since all variables are always there this is a tedious task to scroll through that massive matrix of scatterplots in scenarios of wide datasets. I'd appreciate to see two input lists for Multivariate with pairwise correlations/scatterplots from the variables in one list versus the variables in the other list.

kevin_herlihy_l · ‎11-03-2020

Dear JMP Team, I'd love to have the ability to generate a summary table where the data itself was linked to the source table. And if I'm being greedy, I'd like to be able to use the summary table to generate a table of stacked columns which also link back to the original source table. This would ultimately result in the ability to change the source data and have the change reflected in a stacked summary table. Thanks, Kevin Herlihy

KurtAnderson · ‎10-28-2020

I wish different lines on a x-y plot in Graph builder would appear with different symbols in addition to different colors, by default. The reason by default is important is because, as someone who is slightly (very?) color blind, I find it difficult to differentiate between the different overlay categories simply based on color. Often I'll manually change symbols in the dataset one by one in order to see the differences.

JMP Wish List

Graph Builder - Slider for lagging variables

Simulator for Categorical or Dichotomous (Pass/Fail) Responses?

Hide data point from the chart without actions on rows/columns

New Default graphlet options for platforms that produce summary data and plots of summary data

Request to support multiple options to calculate quantiles

to increase interactivity of the word cloud

Be able to set the default number of levels in graph builder and save out binning

Standard Error Correction and Bootstrap in SEM platform

Sort the X axis in graph builder by the overlay levels

Profiler Extrapolation

Decouple Scatterplot Matrix Axes

Surface and Contour Profiler Confidence and Prediction Bounds

Add the ability to use a local data filter in Evaluate Design

interactive html 3D support

Pareto analysis p values

Distribution platform - Fitting continuous distributions

Add scatterplot matrix options to graph builder

Multivariate Platform with two separate input lists (Scatterplot)

Virtually linked summary tables and stacked columns

Graph builder symbols and colors