JMP Wish List

Every day we have new data that need to add/update to the existing data table  I need a simple operation that will be able to concatenate new row(s) and/or new column(s) to the existing table and also update the existing table if the new table show a change in the data value by matching columns criteria. ... View more

I would like to suggest a feature to be added for validation runs of your DoE model. Usually when I have the data for my DoE model I run an additional 3-5 runs to validate the model and compare the outcome of the runs to what the model predicted. It would be very useful to have this as a feature in JMP to augment the design with additional runs and compare the results to the model predictions by a test of equivalence.  ... View more

I know there is a lot that can be done with two layers, but being limited with two layers even in JMP Pro is not a good idea. As a customer, I can get any layer in a free package of Python and I don't know why I should not be able to get the same with JMP Pro. Number of layers in the best option would be selective, otherwise, at least provide three layers (Input, middle, output layers). ... View more

Hello,   I would like to recommend the following enhancements to the Process Capability platform, specifically as pertains to non-normal indices (i.e., where no distribution fits and indices are calculated based on percentiles).   1. Allow calculation based on actual percentiles, separate from using a curve fit (currently, the calculation for non-parametric distributions uses Smooth Curve). 2. Allow calculation of metrics based on different percentile ranges, with suitable scaling factors based on normalizing the distribution and sample sizes, conceptually similar to what is done for robust-sigma calculations. Examples listed below. 0.00135 – 0.99865 => 1 0.005 – 0.995 => 0.859 0.05 – 0.95 => 0.548 0.1 – 0.9 => 0.427 0.25 – 0.95 => 0.225   Thanks and regards Mehul Shroff ... View more

☐ cool new feature ☑ could help many Jmp users! ☐ removes something that feels like a „bug“ ☐nice to have ☐ nobody needs it      What inspired this wish list request?  In a Data Filter there is a hidden feature to include / not include rows with missing values in a column with modelling type continuous:   If the red triangle menu is closed, the user cannot see if the option is on or off.     What is the improvement you would like to see?    1) In the main display box of the Data Filter, please add an indicator that shows if "select missing" is on or off.   2) In the main display box of the Data Filter please add a function to activate/deactivate "select missing".   Why is this idea important?  Missing Data is extremely dangerous - especially if the user doesn't know/see how Jmp handles this data.   more wishes from     ... View more

☑ cool new feature ☐ could help many users! ☐ removes a „bug“ ☐ nice to have ☐ nobody needs it     Adjusting gradient settings is very time consuming because the menu has to be closed to get the changes applied. Often, the settings have to be tried and optimized iteratively. A "live view" could help:   alternative: direct mouse control of the gradient scaling settings: https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Wish-List/mouse-control-for-color-gradient/idi-p/486588 ... View more

I'd like to suggest the ability to only lock one side of an axis range (the min or the max).  This would allow the user to lock the range at zero (min) and then allow the max setting to vary with the data range.  This would mimic the way the axis setting works in a popular program that rhymes with "terrel".   Thanks for considering this request.   Steve ... View more

Document the names of the markers. In https://community.jmp.com/t5/Uncharted/Integrate-Interpolate-and-SplineEval/bc-p/657963#M381 it isn't clear that 12 or 16 is a circle or a diamond. As far as I can tell, the pdf doc does not list the names. The scripting index does, incomplete..., here:   An elided list of names.   Using them for Marker State is important. The number is pretty meaningless. They already work if only the names can be guessed.   Got that name from the Point Marker list. Note that is for Control Charts and pretty unrelated to row states.     it would be nice if this message was more helpful   List the possible choices as part of the message.   The markers are currently found like this These are zero-based; the diamond is 16. and you can see why I might think there would be a large circle. I guess the small circle is "Dot", but the data table shows nothing for a dot. Maybe the scripting index for Marker State can show all the names. ... View more

☐ cool new feature ☑ could help many users! ☐ removes a „bug“ ☐ nice to have ☐ nobody needs it     In the NewFormulaColumn/Transform menu there are many useful functions, but "modulo" is missing:     more wishes submitted by   ... View more

☐  cool new feature ☑ could help many users! ☐ removes a „bug“ ☐ nice to have ☐ nobody needs it     sometimes it's hard to find the right column again and again.   some suggestions to make it easier:       - define special colors for special columns (or groups):   - make the vertical line between groups thicker     more wishes submitted by   ... View more

When I am using the Fit Model platform with Standard Least Squares, I can effectively save the prediction formula and standard errors to a separate column. When I do this for multiple responses, I can effectively use the Graph -> Profiler menu to overlay those models. This is very helpful, as each response may have a different set of meaningful predictors in it. Here is a reference to such a thread on the topic:   https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/Confidence-Interval-in-prediction-profiler/td-p/10817   However, if I have a generalized linear model (GLM) such as a logistic regression, I have no such luck. Within the single model for fitting the GLM Personality, the results in that platform have confidence intervals on them. However, I am only able to export the prediction formula. If my most 2 important responses contains one normal response with Standard Least Squares, and one binomial response with a GLM logistic regression model, I cannot create a joint Prediction Profiler with effective predictions and confidence intervals. I am optimistic this can be done because we already have evidence that the confidence intervals can be created for GLMs. You just have to work out what the StdErr Pred Formula column would look like.   I brought this up as a ticket with JMP as well. The following series of responses from JMP support certainly brought attention to the issue, but perhaps if others find value in this enhancement, then it is more likely to be completed.   "Unfortunately, at the moment, I do not see a way to get a confidence interval around the predicted probability for the binary response in the combined standalone profiler."   "I see what you mean about the inability to save Standard Error Formulas for GLM's or for Least Squares models containing nested terms. I am not aware of any particular reason why this is the case. I will pass these items on to JMP R&D for their consideration in a future version of JMP."   ... View more

I would like a button in Graph Builder that opens a table, like shown below, that allows me to change all of the major font settings in Graph Builder without having to go into each axis separately or even into the main Preferences.   I like the CTRL - SHIFT - +/- functionality, but that doesn't solve everything (especially as it enlarges everything in JMP which I often don't want).       Maybe there could be more subgroups than shown in my table for which to change all settings at once. ... View more

Please implement native Polar plot platform. Also called Radar Plot, Star Plot etc. There are some work arounds that you can find, for instance a cylindrical 3D plots add-in from Mr. Brady Brady (@brady_brady), but a native platform with all the usual controls over lines, markers, colors, point selections etc. would be much better. Something like this: or this (this one is from Mr. Xam Gregg's blog post):   This is actually, an illustration how would reference range look on this kind of plot:   If something like that already exists, I apologize and please help me find it. ... View more

Dear all, we use Box Plots a lot, and the new features in JMP 16 (notched ...) are great, but it would be quite helpful to be able to control these features already in preference settings.   So I would vote for including features like  Box Style( "Solid" ), Notched( 1 ), Fences( 1 ), Name( "5 Number Summary" )(1) in preferences to not need to specify them in each plot again.   See script and screenshot for illustration. Thanks,     Names Default To Here( 1 ); // styled Box Plot with notch and colos dt = Open( "$SAMPLE_DATA/Big Class.jmp" ); dlg = Column Dialog( xCols = Col List( "X, Factors", Min Col( 1 ), Max Col( 1 ), Modeling Type( "Categorical" ) ), yCols = Col List( "Y, Response", Min Col( 1 ), Max Col( 1 ), Modeling Type( "Continuous" ) ) ); gb = Graph Builder( Show Control Panel( 0 ), Variables( X( dlg["xCols"][1] ), Y( dlg["yCols"][1] ), Color( dlg["xCols"][1] ) ), Elements( Box Plot( X, Y, Legend( 3 ), Box Style( "Solid" ), Notched( 1 ), Fences( 1 ), Name( "5 Number Summary" )(1) ) ) ); ... View more

☑ cool new feature ☑ could help many users! ☐ removes something that feels like a „bug“ ☐ nice to have ☐ nobody needs it   What inspired this wish list request?  Sometimes / often missing values are even more important than the available values. Great: - More and more modelling platforms got the option "informative missing". - Column manager shows the number of missing values:   - there is even a platform to analyze Missing Value   On the other hand, there is Graph Builder: With the default setting, Graph Builder doesn't show "missing values". If a user generates a x/y scatter plot and uses a column with missing values as color or overlay, all the points with missing values will DISAPPEAR from the scatter plot. The "easy" solution: enable Include Missing Categories from the Shift + red triangle menu - or via the preferences.  Then the points will show up with a separate category:   For nominal values on an axis, it's the same, the values will show up as a separate category. Very convenient to Explorer Missing values.     Unfortunately, for continuous values, there is no option to show the missing values separate from the other points. A workaround: the user can generate a transform column for is missing(:col) and show the points in a separate subplot: Missing entries - modelling type: continuous        But unfortunately, the functionality of  transform columns is quite restricted: improvements for Transform Column  e.g. - a transform column doesn't react on changes via a column switcher - it's not possible to get a reference to a transform column. Therefore it's not possible to programatically change the transform column to the new column   What is the improvement you would like to see?  Please add an Option Include Missing values to Graph Builder (via Shift + red triangle menu - and maybe via preference) which acts like  Include Missing Categories , but for continuous values - and generates a plot similar to this one:     Why is this idea important?  In combination with column switcher this will add a new, incredibly useful way to explore missing values :) Just imagine how useful it will be to display missing values in a Graph - separate from the actual values.   more wishes from   ... View more

☐ cool new feature ☐ could help a lot of Jmp users! ☑ removes something that feels like a „bug“ ☐ nice to have ☐ nobody needs it   What inspired this wish list request?  The Column Switcher is very useful - but it has one major drawback:    The user can only specify which column to replace - but not WHERE in the graph. If a column appears in multiple places in the graph, ALL of them are replaced with the new column selected in the Column Switcher. So Column Switcher feels a bit like "Column Switcher light".   A great add-in that solves the problem:  Column Quick Swapper - easily change multiple Y and X-axis columns in Graph Builder    What remains is the opposite issue:  A column is only replaced by Column Switcher, if it appears directly in GraphBuilder. If a column is used in a Transform Column, Column Switcher ignores it.   What is the improvement you would like to see?  Please add an  option to Column Switcher to replace columns in Transform columns as well.   Why is this idea important?  Column Switcher is cool  - Transform columns are essential for certain use cases. Column Switcher + Transform Columns is a nightmare.    With the new functionality, Column Switcher + Transform Columns will become a dream team :)   more wishes from       ... View more

What inspired this wish list request? Due to a change in default for JMP17. Previously in JMP16, the jitter default looks like this:   But the JMP17 default is now something like this:    We see in the Fit Y by X platform and its preferences you can only use a boolean to turn jitter on/off. Oneway( Y( :Data ), X( :Levels ), X Axis Proportional( 0 ), Points Jittered( 1 ), We did discover by doing a right-click and select Customize > Marker, that the option to change the jitter is shown Oneway( Y( :Data ), X( :Levels ), Means( 1 ), Box Plots( 1 ), Mean Diamonds( 1 ), X Axis Proportional( 0 ), Points Jittered( 1 ), SendToReport( Dispatch( {}, "Oneway Plot", FrameBox, {Frame Size( 607, 243 ), DispatchSeg( Marker Seg( 1 ), Set Jitter( "Random Uniform", "X", 1, 0, 355 )   What is the improvement you would like to see? We would like the option to set the type of jitter in the Fit Y by X platform similar to the Graph Builder jitter options. To also allow this in the Preferences for the platform. Graph Builder( Size( 526, 448 ), Show Control Panel( 0 ), Variables( X( :Levels ), Y( :Data ), Color( :Levels ) ), Elements( Points( X, Y, Legend( 7 ), Jitter( "Random Uniform" ), Jitter Limit( 0.4381 ) ) ) );   Why is this idea important? To standarize reports for viewers preferences, instead of having to change each time, or run a script that adjusts the elements of the Fit Y by X, should allow this platform to change as a preference and a menu option in the Fit Y by X platform.     ... View more

What inspired this wish list request?  There is a plethora of posts in the Jmp Community concerning Date and Time data curation, e.g.  Manipulating Timestamp  Unix Timestamp to Real Date & time  Changing Date Format  Date-Time Format Problem  Date Format help please  change date format    There are some tools which help a lot - but any improvement will help :)   For time & date columns the user can select from a long list of standard settings and even specify a custom pattern. BuiltIn presets can be concatenate to construct the desired pattern.   Unfortunately, every time the user has to construct a pattern he has to start from scratch.   What is the improvement you would like to see?  Please add a history to the custom date/time pattern dialog window.     Why is this idea important? If a user uses a pattern once, there is a large chance that he will use it again. With the history aavailable in the dialog window, it will be much easier to use the Format Pattern window: Invest the time once to generate the pattern and enjoy it for the rest of your live.           more wishes submitted by   ... View more