cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • JMP will suspend normal business operations for our Winter Holiday beginning on Wednesday, Dec. 24, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. ET (2:00 p.m. ET for JMP Accounts Receivable).
    Regular business hours will resume at 9:00 a.m. EST on Friday, Jan. 2, 2026.
  • We’re retiring the File Exchange at the end of this year. The JMP Marketplace is now your destination for add-ins and extensions.
JMP Bar Chart

Welcome to the JMP User Community!

Ask questions, get answers, meet other JMP users

Learning Resources

Latest Discussions

  • Adding candidate runs in mixture design

    HI, Is it possible to include candidate runs in mixture design. When i tried to add 4 runs that i wanted to include in the design. It is considering them as another factors. So, may someone explain how this works?

    Mathej01 Mathej01
    Discussions |
    Dec 5, 2023 1:31 AM
    2742 views | 5 replies
  • I have lingering confusion about blocking variables in my design and analysis.

    Hi all, I'm using JMP Pro 15.2.1.I have lingering confusion about blocking in a designed experiment. In particular, whether I am indeed blocking at all.In my experiment, I have three 2-level (on/off) factors of interest. The response variable is the time-to-perform a task. I want to do a 2x2x2 factorial and I'm interested in testing the significance of main effects and 2-way interactions. I have 2...

    gchesterton gchesterton
    Discussions |
    Dec 4, 2023 9:50 AM
    3044 views | 5 replies
  • 2^3 factorial with blocked replicates

    Hello I was looking to construct a 2^3 factorial design which is replicated once (total runs=16). At the end the replication should be blocked and therefore each block should contain the original 2^3 factorial design. Is there an easy way? My way using the Custom Design Tool ended in a replicated half factorial in each block. Thanks :)      

    Luca_Indrizzi Luca_Indrizzi
    Discussions |
    Dec 1, 2023 10:12 AM
    2962 views | 5 replies
  • How to create all possible plate layouts for an assay (4cols,4rows and 4cols,6rows)?

    I would like to use JMP to create all of the possible plate layouts for a biological assay: 1. where the plate has 4 cols and 4 rows and 8 samples are duplicated on the plate (example illustrated below)2. where the plate has 4 cols and 6 rows and 12 samples are duplicated on the plate Is this possible using the JMP DoE platform? one example layout for a 4x4 plate with 8 duplicated samples: 

    Fiona_Baines Fiona_Baines
    Discussions |
    Dec 1, 2023 7:10 AM
    2023 views | 3 replies
  • Custom design or mixture design? which one to choose?

    Is there any difference between a mixture design and custom design with same factors treated as mixtures? Which would be better? 

    Mathej01 Mathej01
    Discussions |
    Nov 30, 2023 4:39 AM
    2914 views | 4 replies

Latest Discussions

  • I have lingering confusion about blocking variables in my design and analysis.

    Hi all, I'm using JMP Pro 15.2.1.I have lingering confusion about blocking in a designed experiment. In particular, whether I am indeed blocking at all.In my experiment, I have three 2-level (on/off) factors of interest. The response variable is the time-to-perform a task. I want to do a 2x2x2 factorial and I'm interested in testing the significance of main effects and 2-way interactions. I have 2...

    gchesterton gchesterton
    Discussions |
    Dec 4, 2023 9:50 AM
    3044 views | 5 replies
  • removing terms from a model following a designed experment

    Ok, suppose I've conducted a full factorial design with four 2-level factors. When fitting the model I've included all 2-way interactions. Some of the factors' main effects and interactions are not significant at 0.05. If I then remove the least significant factors (those at the bottom of the effect summary table), some of the non-significant terms become significant. If I were trying to develop t...

    gchesterton gchesterton
    Discussions |
    Nov 27, 2023 10:20 AM
    3696 views | 5 replies
  • how to get fixed effect tests table to appear

    I have a continuous response variable (Average) and a categorical predictor (Treatment) with labels 1 through 14 indicating the 14 levels. I have set the Treatment variable as ordinal, and was able to use the fit model function to obtain the least squares means table and least square means plot. However, I am unable to figure out how to obtain a table for a type 3 test of fixed effects. Specifical...

    aczura aczura
    Discussions |
    Nov 27, 2023 10:01 AM
    1885 views | 2 replies
  • how to get a type 3 fixed effects test table

    Does anybody know how to get a type 3 fixed effects test in JMP using the Fit Model option? I have a continuous response variable and a categorical predictor. I need a table that lists the denominator degrees of freedom for the F value. It should be a table that comes with the name Fixed Effect Tests. Please help!

    aczura aczura
    Discussions |
    Nov 27, 2023 8:59 AM
    1083 views | 1 replies
  • Design space for 4 variables

    We designed an RSM model for the optimization of 4 variables that are used as a combination. Once the results are obtained how do we obtain the design space (sweet spot) for all 4 variables together? Please help. Many Thanks!

    Amp Amp
    Discussions |
    Nov 27, 2023 8:01 AM
    1894 views | 4 replies

Latest Discussions

  • Could JMP optimize factors with uncertainty?

    Hello community!!,A question: will it be possible for the profiler to find the best combinations of factors with uncertainty when performing a simulation, which maximize the total utility and minimize the total cost, generating a table of the best combinations found? For example: 

    Marco1 Marco1
    Discussions |
    Nov 21, 2023 9:08 AM
    920 views | 0 replies
  • Caution: Places where Jmp does something unexpected

    Definitely, JMP is Not a Spreadsheet . And that's great!! Besides this difference, there are other places where Jmp doesn't do/behave/produce what a newbie / innocent Jmp user expects.
    If a user knows these issues and the remedies and workarounds -  he/she can
    a) save a lot of time b) be safe from data loss c) be sure that the results are as expected.

    [More Topic Containers like this]   Topicdescrip...

    hogi hogi
    Discussions |
    Nov 17, 2023 4:15 AM
    1404 views | 0 replies
  • Getting NonEstimable values when crossing variables due to control setup

    Hi,   I'm working on a dataset where we are testing the effects of 2 treatments and the delay between them, and I'm trying to figure out how to line up my variables so I can do a Dunnett's test against various controls. We are giving animals a dose of drug A (Variable A), waiting some time (T), and then giving them a dose of drug B . If the animal is NOT given drug A (= 0), then T doesn't have a m...

    eberndl eberndl
    Discussions |
    Nov 10, 2023 10:48 AM
    793 views | 0 replies
  • How to adjust the factor range for specific factors within an ongoing DOE

    Hi, I designed a DOE that has two independent buffers. This DOE will range components in each buffer which will be used in a processing step sequentially. IE, buffer A, followed by buffer B. We already prepared for the DOE, and formulated the A buffers as per the recommended design. For the B buffers, we intended on ranging 2 components but later decided to reduce to ranging one component, and als...

    MetaLizard62080 MetaLizard62080
    Discussions |
    Oct 26, 2023 5:25 PM
    760 views | 0 replies
  • Discrete Choice Experiment: Prohibited Combination

    Hi everyone,I would like to design my first DCE. I am going to use 6 attributes that differ in the levels from 2 to 4 levels. However, I have a limitation where there is an impossible combination that may appear; for example, the cheapest product would not be possible to have the best feature. Is there any way for me to select the prohibited combination? Or, is the D-optimal design will always cal...

    andikawp andikawp
    Discussions |
    Sep 6, 2023 7:11 AM
    838 views | 0 replies
view all discussions