JMP Wish List

Under the analyze tab, in the new Easy DOE platform, there is a plot using red/green to describe if factors are included in the model or not. I suggest that it should be possible to get this plot outside of the Easy DOE platform. ... View more

Currently in Graph Builder, when using box plot and points graphs combined in the same graph, the box plots properly segregate into "series" when a category is added to 'overlay' but the points do not overlap their coresponding box plot and are instead jumbled. It is as if the box plots have an hidden overlap variable set to 0% (terminology from excel bar graphs) but the points have a hidden overlap variable set to 100%.  There are a few ways to fix it, but are either not exact, or take a lot of work to properly format the image, changing box plot colors for proper grouping, and requiring an extra legend to be added.  Here is a post with pics refrencing the effects. ... View more

In some addins I have written (currently using JMP 16.2) I am storing user preferences in a file inside the addin folder.  On the other side there are these PFS files which JMP uses itself to store its settings and preferences.    I think it would be a great idea to have some JSL commands to store preferences and settings in PFS files -  much alike the PFS files are used in e.g. JSL-Hamcrest.    These addin-generated preference files should be persistent, so that an addin update does not remove the PFS file.   Example of an PFS file which e,g, JMP and JSL-Hamcrest does use:   Example Preferences( GUI Location( "Bottom" ), Use Markup( 1 ), Show Embedded Log( 1 ) ) The PFS files store are as I have seen all data types as Strings, Numbers, List, Matrix, ...     The preference file should be loaded from the addin by its filename:   load preferences("<addin-path>\user-preferences.PFS")     To get a preference value we call a function to load the value (String, Number, List, Matrix,...) get preference( "Use Markup" ) // => 1   For setting the preference value we call a function to set the value (String, Number, List, Matrix,...) set preference( "Use Markup" ) = 0   After addin usage the preference file should be saved back: save preferences("<addin-path>\user-preferences.PFS")   It would be helpful if you can add this fucntionality to the next JMP/JSL version.     ... View more

Hello,   I would like to request an enhancement of the Life Distribution dialog. Similar to what's available in Fit Life b X, can the Life Distribution dialog offer the user a choice of what fit / scale they want to start with? Currently, it defaults to non-parametric and requires additional steps to change to something else. This can take up a lot of time if the dataset is large.   Thanks and regards Mehul Shroff ... View more

Hello,   I would like to request that the Fix Mixture command in Life Distribution be enhanced to enable JMP to fit the data with the best mixture possible as an initial / default option. The user can then choose to do something different if they prefer.   Thanks and regards Mehul Shroff ... View more

Hello,   I would like to request that the Copy Picture command under Edit in the grey-triangle menu be moved up one level for easier access. Copy Picture isn't really an edit command so it seems to be misplaced there, in addition to requiring additional navigation.   Thanks and regards Mehul Shroff   cc: @PatrickGiuliano ... View more

Hi JMP Users and JMP team,   I had an old idea looking at the visual "Split history" from the Decision Tree platform (see image "Split_history" attached), and thinking about this visualisation for DoE models created by the "Fit Model" or "Fit Stepwise" platforms.   Would it be possible and feasible to add in these platform (or in one of these platforms) a similar graph showing the evolution of different models metrics (like R², R² adjusted, RMSE, p-value of the model, ... perhaps to be chosen/selected by the user) in order to help the user define the best possible model (perhaps as an option in the red triangle like "Split history") ? It could be a sort of graph, that updates each time the user deletes a term from the model or add one, and that shows the result of this step on different metrics compared to previous models/steps, in order for the user to have an overview about how big the change may be for the model depending on the term removed/added (see for example image "DoE-Model_selection-help"). Maybe this idea would be easier to implement on the Fit Stepwise platform, as this platform already shows the step history and various metrics linked to each model (see image "DoE-Stepwise").  I share with you a datatable with an example of DoE, with various noise level on the response. In the various scripts "Table models parameters and selection ...", I saved the different metrics for each model steps, and created a profiler with various functions and desirabilities (R², R² PRESS, RMSE, etc...). The goal was to use the profiler in order to find the best possible model step. I hope this does not sound too crazy or over-complex, as I see this new feature as a good opportunity for models creator to quickly look at how terms impact their models in a simple way. The Generalized Regression platform also has a similar visualization ("Solution Path") that helps a lot decide about the model. I would be interested to get some feedback about this, ... View more

  In the Specialized Modeling menu, I frequently find the need to compare curve fitting models.  It might be nice to have an easy way to compare all curve fitting models within a particular submenu (e.g., polynomials, sigmoid, multiple parameter logistic, exponential growth and decay).  I was wondering if a menu item could be added to compare the curve-fitting of appropriately grouped curve fitting models (analogous to the functionality in the Distribution menu for comparing the various possibilities in the Continuous Fit menu by selecting "All"). ... View more

I would like to see the version number surfaced on the banner of each JMP window, right after the currently displayed Product i.e. JMP Home Window - JMP Pro 13.2.1 Big Class - JMP Pro 14.0.0 Big Class - Bivariate of weight by height - JMP Pro 12.2.0 ... View more

There is a degradation platform, but if we want to write a report, we need all the details for each step which is provided in ICH Guideline (Poolability, Model, Model Selection, ...). It would be great if we had such a platform.  ... View more

I really like the flexibility with many of the New Formula Column features. When there are very wide tables it is more helpful to navigate using the Columns Panel. It would be good to highlight columns of interest through the Columns Panel and be able to right-click and use New Formula Column features as it could be much faster than needing to go to the column headers manually and doing the right-click on the exact header. Right now some features are shared such as Column Info, but that would be a nice improvement in terms of matching up functionalities. ... View more

ヘルプやドキュメントの検索が従来の完全一致式の検索しかできないので、ほしい情報を探すのに非常に時間がかかっています。ヘルプやドキュメントをAIチャット化して、類似語や文章形式で探せるようにしてほしいです。 ... View more

It would be nice if Tolerance Intervals calculated in the Distribution Platform came with a visualization (e.g.) on top of the Histogram. The graph below gives an example. There, I added the Graph Builder visualization of a Tolerance Interval below the Distribution Histogram. I left out Spec-Limits there, but if so specified in the column properties, they should be shown there, as well. Similar to other features in Distribution I image it would be possible to show or hide this visualization via the red triangle menu.   There are further ideas presented in the Wish List in connection with Tolerance Intervals, e.g. https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Wish-List/Setting-Confidence-and-Proportion-to-Cover-for-Tolerance/idi-p/51188 https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Wish-List/3-Sigma-Intervals-and-Tolerance-Intervals-in-Graph-Builder/idi-p/51192 https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Wish-List/Statistical-rationales-for-sample-sizes/idi-p/52052   ... View more

I'd like to see the ability to have warning limits as a column property and equivalence limits as a column property.  Warning limits would show up much like spec limits do on charts (default should be a dashed orange line) entry would look like the spec limit column input box and would be respected in the process screener as it's own columns of % past warning limit and qty past warning limit. Equivalent limits would be respected by any equivalence test platform as well as the equivalence testing in response screener when you save out a "compare means" table vs having to use a "Practical Difference Portion" of the spec limit assigned to a column.  (like detection limit columns property input box). Both these column properties could be picked up by the "manage spec limits" platform. Thanks for condieration! Steve ... View more

When using 'colour or mark by column' from the 'Rows' menu, one can assign different symbols or colours to different variables, but the graph legend in graph builder does not update to show the reader what each symbol or colour represents (the actual data points update, but the legend does not) - it would be great if we could have the legend update as well to really elevate this functionality.  ... View more

Hi JMP users, I used to run some non-parametric comparisons for each pair using the Wilcoxon method in a repeated-measures designs through Analysis -> Fit Y by X report. I would like to know if it is possible to develop an effect-size calculator (add-in) for that purpose, please. Thank you. ... View more

Hi JMP users, I would like to know if it is possible to develop an add-in to calculate the effect-size for repeated-measures design with random effect. I used to run the LSMeans Tukey HSD algorithm in Fit Model report. Thank you.   ... View more