Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
JMP Wish List
We want to hear your ideas for improving JMP. Share them here.- JMP User Community
- :
- JMP Wish List : Top Ideas
We want to hear your ideas for improving JMP software
We know that you have many valuable ideas on potential new features, or enhancements to existing features. You can use this Wish List to share your ideas, and discuss how to improve JMP, with other users across the globe.
Here's how to participate:
- Search: Please search for an existing idea first before submitting a new idea.
- Kudo & Comment Kudo ideas you like, and comment to add to an idea.
- Subscribe: Follow the status of ideas you like. Refer to status definitions to understand where an idea is in its lifecycle. (You are automatically subscribed to ideas you've submitted or commented on.)
- Submit: Post your new idea using the Suggest an Idea button. Please submit one actionable idea per post rather than a single post with multiple ideas.
We can’t implement everything, so please include the following to help JMP Product Management evaluate your ideas for consideration:
- What inspired this wish list request? Please describe the current issue that needs improvement or the problem to be solved that is not easy or possible right now, with an example use case.
- What is the improvement you would like to see? Please describe the idea for improving JMP. Please include mock-ups, wireframes, screenshots, scripts, other documents or examples from other software that help describe the change you would like to see.
- Why is this idea important? Please describe the value to you and/or other users if the idea is implemented (for example, ease of use, must have,…).
Template inclusion failed (for parameter value "lingotek_macro_header.ftl"): There was an error loading the template on an earlier attempt; see cause exception. ---- FTL stack trace ("~" means nesting-related): - Failed at: #include "lingotek_macro_header.ftl" [in template "Lingotek_CP_BulkTranslation_Angular" at line 39, column 5] ----
Status:
Acknowledged
Submitted on
06-23-2024
03:32 AM
Submitted by
FairProductFox3
on
06-23-2024
03:32 AM
There should be an add-in which allows generating regression lines accounting for errors in both X and Y. Usually york fit is used for this purpose in other software. It is crucial that JMP also introduces this feature.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
What inspired this wish list request?
Making small mistakes when launching JMP Platforms and I already have implemented this to my platforms.
What is the improvement you would like to see?
I would like to see "Keep dialog open" checkbox in all of the JMP platforms which have a launcher and close it when you press "OK". Other option would be to provide some sort of "Preview" for the platforms but this would be much more complicated to implement to not slow down platforms too much.
Why is this idea important?
Making very small mistake in JMP launcher forces you to find the launcher from menus again and pressing Recall or you can use View/Recall Last Platform (hidden inside menus and has very bad shortcut by default as it forces you to remove your hand from mouse).
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
What inspired this wish list request? Unlike other statistical software (Minitab), it seems that JMP doesn't provide detailed formulas for analyses. This lack of details and transparency can make it difficult for users to understand the underlying calculations. What is the improvement you would like to see? Provide more formulas for analyses where it makes sense to include them in the support documentation and in cases where formulas are quite complex, simplified formulas for simplified examples so the user can understand the concept. Why is this idea important? understand the underlying calculations, it is quite often to get request to explain the analysis, how do you derive this conclusion and what kind of analysis and fundamental concept formulas are being used in the analysis.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Status:
Needs Info
Submitted on
06-19-2024
06:49 PM
Submitted by
ConfidenceBee27
on
06-19-2024
06:49 PM
What inspired this wish list request? When comparing designs/improvements during accelerated testing, the goal is to compress timing (hence accelerate) but not change the failure mode. Taking Weibull statistics, one aims to shorten the 'time' or eta while maintaining the 'slope' or beta. Weibull ++ software did this chart by showing a confidence region (say 95%) or map in a eta vs. beta plot. What is the improvement you would like to see? Enable ability to plot eta vs. beta in the reliability platform. Why is this idea important? This is the most visual way to see the effect of accelerated testing and avoid pitfalls.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
What inspired this wish list request? Column Info/properties (e.g., data type and modeling type) and Local Data Filter settings (in the case of multiple reports generated using By variables) have to be individually set. What is the improvement you would like to see? Enable broadcasting for Column info/properties and LDF settings. Currently, the former can be accomplished by copying/pasting column properties but it would be faster to do it while initially setting the properties. Why is this idea important?
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
What inspired this wish list request? Currently, Text to Columns supports only one delimiter. Often, multiple delimiters may simultaneously exist in the data. In such cases, the operation has to be done sequentially. What is the improvement you would like to see? Enable use of multiple delimiters (e.g., space, -, _, /) simultaneously. Also provide users the option to retain or remove the source column. Why is this idea important? Ease of use, increased efficiency.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Status:
Under Consideration
Submitted on
06-18-2024
02:28 AM
Submitted by
jthi
on
06-18-2024
02:28 AM
jthi
on
06-18-2024
02:28 AM
What inspired this wish list request?
Working a little with Python code in JMP's Script Editor and hoping for a bit more.
What is the improvement you would like to see?
Add dark theme (Currently there isn't properly working dark theme and I had to create my own). Make this different from JSL so it is immediately obvious which editor is open (background might be most important part of this).
Bracket highlighting doesn't seem to work properly with Python in Script Editor.
When using single-quotes they aren't being auto-matched
Add some sort of opinionated formatter for Python (ruff, black, ...) which could be used with Reformat Script
Disable JSL auto-complete from Script Editor when using Python (or add one which supports Python).
Why is this idea important?
Makes writing Python in Script Editor easier and more fun. Currently I almost feel like I should always go to some other IDE and paste the code back to Script Editor.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Status:
Acknowledged
Submitted on
06-17-2024
03:00 PM
Submitted by
bswedlove
on
06-17-2024
03:00 PM
What inspired this wish list request? Please describe the current issue that needs improvement or the problem to be solved that is not easy or possible right now, with an example use case. I would like to access the Title of the Button Box. What is the improvement you would like to see? Please describe the idea for improving JMP. Please include mock-ups, wireframes, screenshots, scripts, other documents or examples from other software that help describe the change you would like to see. I would like the << Title() and << Get Title() commands to work for button boxes Why is this idea important? Please describe the value to you and/or other users if the idea is implemented (for example, ease of use, must have,…). This will enhance ability of scripts to make better GUI's.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Status:
Acknowledged
Submitted on
06-14-2024
04:30 AM
Submitted by
DeepANOVABat419
on
06-14-2024
04:30 AM
I would like to get suggestions in the graph builder on different type of available graphs based on the input parameters. Specifically, I am suggesting a feature similar to Minitab, where user can input all their variables and receive recommendations for applicable graph types. This would streamline the graph selections process and enhance usability.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
What inspired this wish list request?
Removing all columns from quick columns can be unintuitive. Let's say you pick two columns to group by but then you wish to remove those. You will have to select EXACTLY those two columns to clear group by -> if you select any more those will be added to group by, if you select all columns old ones will be removed and new ones added. So you end up in this cycle where you are continuously right clicking on separate columns and checking which columns are still in group by.
What is the improvement you would like to see?
I would like to see few possible changes.
1. Add new option "Clear Group By". This would remove all columns from the group by
2. Figure out how to make adding/removing columns more intuitive (add new buttons Add to Group, Remove From Group? instead of just having a toggle). Example follows:
I have Semiconductor Capability table open and I wish to create grouping column. First I think I need to have lot_id and wafer as my group columns, I select then and make them into the group. Then I remember that I have to include SITE to my group. I still have my lot_id and wafer selected so I just add SITE to selection and click group by
What I will end up with is just SITE in the group
And it can get even messier when you try to add more columns and finally try to clear them...
Why is this idea important?
JMP is interactive tool and it should be easy to use as possible. Currently it feels like it is easier to just write formulas using JSL than interactive columns, especially if you happen to mess up with group by column selections even once.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
What inspired this wish list request?
Response Screening is very fast platform when comparing multiple Xs and Ys. It also allows Fitting those items but only for selected items whereas Process Screening has two options "Show Charts as Selected" and "Show Charts for Selected". For is one off charts and as updates charts as user selects different rows.
What is the improvement you would like to see?
Add option "Fit as Selected Items" to Response Screening Platform.
And while you are doing that I think you should also rename "Fit Selected Items" to "Fit for Selected Items" to make naming consistent between different platforms. Also similar approach should be applied to all platforms which offer this kind of features (plot once (for) and plot on selection (as)).
Why is this idea important?
Makes it easier to use Response Screening platform if you want to visually see how x and y compare to each other.
Below is a script which can be used to do something like this. It is very quick solution and just creates new window which can then be placed next to response screening for quick checks
Names Default To Here(1);
ps_ref = (Current Report() << XPath("//OutlineBox[@helpKey = 'Response Screening Report']"));
If(N Items(ps_ref) < 1,
Throw("No Response Screening open");
);
ps_ref = ps_ref[1] << get scriptable object;
tb = Report(ps_ref)[Table Box(2)];
nw = New Window("Visual",
plot_collector = V List Box(
);
);
Eval(EvalExpr(
tb << set row change function(Function({this},
sel_rows = this << get selected rows;
xcols = (this[String Col Box("X")] << get)[sel_rows];
ycols = (this[String Col Box("y")] << get)[sel_rows];
lub = Lineup Box(N Col(2));
For Each({{curx, cury}}, Across(xcols, ycols),
lub << Append(
Bivariate(
Y(Eval(curx)), X(Eval(cury)),
Fit Line({Line Color({230, 159, 0})}),
Density Ellipse(0.95, {Line Color({86, 180, 233})}),
SendToReport(Dispatch({}, "Linear Fit", OutlineBox, {Close(1)}))
)
);
);
While(!IsEmpty(Expr(plot_collector) << child),
Try((Expr(plot_collector) << child) << delete box);
);
Expr(plot_collector) << Append(lub);
));
));
Eval(EvalExpr(
nw << On Close(
Expr(tb) << Set Row Change Function(function({this}, return()));
);
));
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Hello, I know there has been similar posts and requests on this topic, sorry about that. Some applications (e.g. in spectroscopy analysis) require doing signal deconvolution using a simple combination of multiple gaussians (see capture attached). I have seen alternatives suggested here (by using the distribution plateform, or with PLS). Does it mean that the multiple gaussians fit method will never be implemeted in JMP (or in a custom add-in)? Thanks Best Regards
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
0
Kudos
Status:
Delivered
Submitted on
06-02-2024
01:25 PM
Submitted by
andrewtkarl
on
06-02-2024
01:25 PM
Right now there is a way to get the current factor settings from a profiler, but there is no native way to get the current response values from the profiler. Instead, we have to scrape them from the display tree of the profiler which could be brittle across JMP releases.
Names Default To Here( 1 );
dt = Open( "$SAMPLE_DATA/Tiretread.jmp" );
obj = dt << Profiler(
Y( :Pred Formula ABRASION, :Pred Formula MODULUS, :Pred Formula ELONG, :Pred Formula HARDNESS ),
Desirability Functions( 1 )
);
obj << Get Factor Settings;
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
According to the manual, the variable clustering colormap should be as described here: Color Map on Correlations "The variables are arranged in the order in which they are listed in the Cluster Members table." But unfortunately, the sort order in the map is first, by cluster, and then by variable name. The cluster members table on the other hand, is sorted by Cluster and then by RSquare with Own Cluster. This has been the case, at least since JMP 16, and it has caused some confusion, especially since axis labels are not shown on the plot, and there is no easy way to add them in the platform. I would like that: 1. The order in the color map is as described, i.e. by cluster and by RSquare with own cluster as in the cluster members table. 2. An option to add Axis labels to the color map so that the color map can be used in presentations. The axis labels should show both the cluster number and the variable name. It is important because currently, the plot is being misinterpreted and it is not possible to use it in a presentation without axis labels.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Status:
Acknowledged
Submitted on
05-30-2024
06:32 PM
Submitted by
bswedlove
on
05-30-2024
06:32 PM
What inspired this wish list request? I sometimes have many JMP instances open at once, in order to sandbox the different scripts I am running. When opening a new instance of JMP, it takes 4 seconds to load. What is the improvement you would like to see? I would like to have the time it takes to load a new JMP Instance decreased from 4 to <1 sec. One way this might be done is if JMP had a pool of instances ready to go that are hidden from user until a new instance is requested. Why is this idea important? This will improve the user experience.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Status:
Acknowledged
Submitted on
05-22-2024
06:45 AM
Submitted by
Steve_Kim
on
05-22-2024
06:45 AM
What inspired this wish list request?
(1) From 'Functional DOE Profiler' feacture in Functional Data Explorer in JMP Pro, I would like to see
(1-1) Confidence Intervals and
(1-2) Interactive HTML file export from the profiler
(2) From 'Model Comparison' in JMP Pro,
(2-1) 'Model Averaging' (Ensemble) result showed a fixed RSquare (1.00) and RASE (0.00). I think it's a bug.
(2-2) Shelf made 'Ensemble model' that is formulated from other models (Least Squares, Partial Least Squares, SVEM Lasso, XGBoost, Neural Turned with different weight) also showed a fixed RSquare (1.00) and RASE (0.00) value in Model Comparison results.
What is the improvement you would like to see?
Why is this idea important?
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
0
Kudos
What inspired this wish list request? @Paul_Nelson wrote The focus on JMP 18 was character and numeric columns. Full support of the data table is current ongoing development. What is the improvement you would like to see? Please add Python support for expression columns. Names Default To Here( 1 );
dt = Open( "$SAMPLE_DATA/Big Class Families.jmp" );
Python Send( dt );
Python Submit("
dt['age'][1] # works
dt['pet'][1] # doesn't work
"
); Why is this idea important?
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
What inspired this wish list request? There has been a shift in my field to reporting RR instead of OR. I'll be submitting a manuscript with aORs but am anticipating a review that asks for aRR instead. What is the improvement you would like to see? Add an option in the drop-down fro Nominal Logistic Fit to perform Risk Ratios, to return results exactly like the current Odds Ratios option provides. Why is this change important? In addition to the basic statistical reasoning for RR vs OR, I need this to publish manuscripts.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Status:
Acknowledged
Submitted on
04-30-2024
05:01 PM
Submitted by
shampton82
on
04-30-2024
05:01 PM
What inspired this wish list request? I was working with @Jordan_Hiller on making a PDF of some text data as the current way I had to make the output required printing a datatable to a PDF printer which wasn't as robust as I wanted: However, it looks like there is no way to easily get text to wrap in the Journal we output the datatable to using this JSL: wajrn = Data Table( "Data table" );
wajrn << journal;
jrn=Current Journal();
jrn <<Set page setup(
margins( .1, .1, .1, .1 ),
scale( .6 ),
portrait( 0 ),
paper size( "Letter" )
);
jrn <<Save PDF("G:\\Charts to print\text.pdf"); Below is a snippet of the Journal output of the datatable and I can change the width of the column but not the rows and there is no way to set a wrap function. So need to be able to wrap the Colbox and have the row size to fit the text. There is a work around through JSL but it is more cumbersome as seen in this post: https://community.jmp.com/t5/Discussions/How-to-Set-Cell-Height-or-Text-Wrapping-in-a-Table-Box/td-p/42569 [community.jmp.com] What is the improvement you would like to see? Ability to have colboxes wrap text and auto size the row width so all text is showing Why is this idea important? Sending out reports through JMP is becoming more important, especially with JMP live being able to run daily reporting activities. Making sure that analysis that outputs text can be conveyed without losing text information allows users to stay in JMP vs having to save out to excel and build additional macros and reports as an additional step.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
0
Kudos
What inspired this wish list request? This is a feature I use all the time in Excel when I need to apply a constant transformation to a set of values What is the improvement you would like to see? Please consider adding an option under the red triangle menu in the Recode utility for transforming numeric values. Perhaps I need to multiply or divide a few values by 100 because some people input a percent as 0.1 and others as 10. Currently I have to change each of those values one by one but this is very easy to do in Excel as shown by the attached screenshot. Why is this idea important? Recode is an amazing utility but this seems like a minor gap in its functionality compared to Excel. There aren't many options for recoding numeric column so this would be helpful. The quick New Formula Column options are great for when you need to transform an entire column but often I only need to do this for a few values.
... View more
See more ideas labeled with:
Idea Statuses
- New 630
- Needs Info 47
- Acknowledged 676
- Under Consideration 19
- Yes, Stay Tuned! 19
- Delivered 252
- © 2026 JMP Statistical Discovery LLC. All Rights Reserved.
- Terms of Use
- Privacy Statement
- Contact Us
This widget could not be displayed.