Welcome to the JMP User Community!

Latest Discussions

• 2023 Americas Discovery Summit User community discount?

  Hi... sorry to be a bother about this...  As I go through registration for the Discovery Summit, the system doesn't seem to recognize my community membership. Is there a code I should use? Thx!

  steven_reagan

  Discussions |

  Aug 2, 2023 1:12 PM

  616 views | 0 replies

• Reliability Forecast Analysis Error

  Hi,I am attempting to run a Reliability Forecast analysis, Analysis>Reliability and Survival>Reliability Forecast>Data Format Tab. Attached is my project file. When I run the above analysis using my two data tabs (Rel Production Data and Rel Failure Data) it comes back with the error, “Total failure count is larger than production volume“. In the Analysis>Reliability and Survival>Reliability Forec...

  RMSEPanther575

  Discussions |

  Aug 2, 2023 12:51 PM

  1323 views | 1 replies

• Two-way clustering vs. cluster variables

  I got a good tip from Scott Allen a few weeks ago for using variable clustering to reduce dataset complexity. I have a very wide data table: 16 rows and 35,000 or more columns. Strangely, if I use "Fast Ward" under hierarchical clustering and choose "two-way" under the red triangle, two-way clustering (by row and by column) occurs within seconds. However, I can't find the option to find the "most ...

  abmayfield

  Discussions |

  Aug 2, 2023 8:48 AM

  2565 views | 4 replies

• Mixture profiler for mixture + process variables

  I have a DOE with three mixture variables and two process variables.  There are constraints on the mixture variables so most of the area in the mixture profiler is shaded out. I'm using JMP17.  I would like to use the mixture profiler to show how the contours in the mixture space change as I move the process variables.  As the design space is a fraction of the ternary plot, I need to change the sc...

  drdrf

  Discussions |

  Aug 1, 2023 1:37 PM

  1677 views | 1 replies

• I think I see a bug in saving CI border formula in Bivariate: 90% CI saved regardless of alpha chosen. 17.0.0

  I was trying to save datapoints that lay above 99.9% CI from Bivariate linear regression results. Selected alpha 0.001 and saved Indiv CIs formula. JM surely enough saves 2 columns named Lower.. and  Upper 99.9% Indiv[my Y variable name]. However, when selecting points in which my Y variable > Upper I see that these limits correspond to much less strict CI, apparently 90%. Removing Fit and redoing...

  l_yampolsky

  Discussions |

  Jul 31, 2023 12:55 PM

  863 views | 1 replies