cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Learn how to build custom Python data connectors and further customize JMP’s Data Connector Framework with the Python Data Connector Demo, available now in the JMP Marketplace!
  • See how to use Accelerated Life Testing (ALT) to evaluate reliability. Register for June 5 webinar, 2pm US Eastern Time.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-307974%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EResumen%20de%20efectos%20y%20Logworth%20con%20valor%20p%20de%200%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-307974%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3Ehola%20alguien%20me%20puede%20ayudar%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EEstoy%20ejecutando%20una%20regresi%C3%B3n%20log%C3%ADstica%20con%20dos%20variables%20x%20a%20continuaci%C3%B3n%2C%20muestra%20el%20resumen%20de%20mi%20efecto%20con%20el%20valor%20logar%C3%ADtmico.%20Ahora%20entiendo%20que%20el%20logworth%20b%C3%A1sicamente%20toma%20el%20-log%20(valor%20p)%20para%20cada%20variable%20x%20y%20eso%20funciona%20para%20el%20valor%20p%200.00219.%20Lo%20que%20me%20confunde%20es%20el%20valor%20logar%C3%ADtmico%20del%20valor%20p%200%2C0000%2C%20%C2%BFc%C3%B3mo%20se%20obtiene%2056%2C125%3F%20Adem%C3%A1s%2C%20en%20otros%20modelos%20de%20regresi%C3%B3n%20me%20he%20encontrado%20con%20diferentes%20valores%20logar%C3%ADtmicos%20para%20el%20valor%20p%20de%200.%20%C2%BFAlguien%20me%20puede%20explicar%20esto%20para%20poder%20seguir%20con%20mi%20vida%3F%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%22jMOP.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22jMOP.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22jMOP.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F26780i1759E01849E47FB5%2Fimage-size%2Fmedium%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D400%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22jMOP.PNG%22%20alt%3D%22jMOP.PNG%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%C2%A1%C2%A1%C2%A1Gracias!!!%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ERaquel%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%23Estad%C3%ADsticas%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-307974%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EInvestigaci%C3%B3n%20del%20Consumidor%20y%20del%20Mercado%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-472249%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Resumen%20de%20efectos%20y%20Logworth%20con%20valor%20p%20de%200%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-472249%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3Eprobablemente%20usaste%20%22e%22%20en%20la%20calculadora%2C%20que%20es%202%2C71828.%20Prueba%2010%5E-57%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-308039%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Resumen%20de%20efectos%20y%20Logworth%20con%20valor%20p%20de%200%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-308039%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBueno%2C%20gracias%2C%20lo%20hice%20con%20una%20calculadora%20y%20ah%C3%AD%20obtuve%20la%20respuesta%2049.%20%C2%A1Gracias%20por%20hacerlo!%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-308038%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Resumen%20de%20efectos%20y%20Logworth%20con%20valor%20p%20de%200%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-308038%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERepasemos%3A%20Log10%20(7.5e-57)%20%3D%20Log10%20(7.5)%20%2B%20Log10%20(e-57)%20%3D%20Log10%20(7.5)%20-%2057%20%3D%200.875%20-%2057%20%3D%20-56.125%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-308037%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Resumen%20de%20efectos%20y%20Logworth%20con%20valor%20p%20de%200%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-308037%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3E-log10%20devuelve%2049.8785%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-308036%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Resumen%20de%20efectos%20y%20Logworth%20con%20valor%20p%20de%200%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-308036%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%C2%BFEst%C3%A1s%20seguro%20de%20que%20usaste%20-Log10%3F%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20Mejor%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20TS%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-307997%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Resumen%20de%20efectos%20y%20Logworth%20con%20valor%20p%20de%200%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-307997%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F2687%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40txnelson%3C%2FA%3E%20bueno%2C%20gracias%20porque%20no%20me%20di%20cuenta%20de%20que%20pod%C3%ADa%20hacer%20eso.%20Dicho%20esto%2C%20el%20valor%20es%207.5e-57%20pero%20cuando%20tomo%20el%20-log%20de%20eso%20me%20da%3CSPAN%3E%2049.8784920133.%20As%C3%AD%20que%20estoy%20m%C3%A1s%20cerca%2C%20pero%20todav%C3%ADa%20no%20estoy%20en%20el%20lugar.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-307995%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20Resumen%20de%20efectos%20y%20Logworth%20con%20valor%20p%20de%200%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-307995%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3Eintente%20hacer%20doble%20clic%20en%20el%20valor%20p%20y%20cambie%20el%20formato%20para%20mostrar%20m%C3%A1s%20lugares%20decimales%20para%20ver%20cu%C3%A1l%20es%20el%20valor%20p%20real.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
rlw268
Level III

Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

Hi can someone help me?

 

I am running logistic regression with two x variables below shows my effect summary with the logworth. Now I understand the logworth basically takes the -log(p-value) for each x variable and that works for the p-value 0.00219. What i am confused about is the logworth of for the p-value 0.0000, how is it getting 56.125? Moreover in other regression models I've run into different logworths for p-value  of 0. Can someone please explain this to me so I can move on with my life?jMOP.PNG

 

Thank you!!!

 

Rachel

 

#statistics

3 ACCEPTED SOLUTIONS

Accepted Solutions
txnelson
Super User

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

try double clicking on the p-value and change the format to show more decimal places to see what the actual p-value is.

Jim

View solution in original post

Thierry_S
Super User

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

Are you sure you used -Log10?
Best,
TS
Thierry R. Sornasse

View solution in original post

Thierry_S
Super User

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

Let's review: Log10 (7.5e-57) = Log10 (7.5) + Log10 (e-57) = Log10 (7.5) - 57 = 0.875 - 57 = -56.125
Thierry R. Sornasse

View solution in original post

7 REPLIES 7
txnelson
Super User

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

try double clicking on the p-value and change the format to show more decimal places to see what the actual p-value is.

Jim
rlw268
Level III

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

@txnelson well thank you cause i didn't realize I could do that. With that being said the value is 7.5e-57 but when I take the -log of that it gives me 49.8784920133. So I'm closer but still not spot on. 

Thierry_S
Super User

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

Are you sure you used -Log10?
Best,
TS
Thierry R. Sornasse
rlw268
Level III

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

-log10 returns 49.8785

Thierry_S
Super User

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

Let's review: Log10 (7.5e-57) = Log10 (7.5) + Log10 (e-57) = Log10 (7.5) - 57 = 0.875 - 57 = -56.125
Thierry R. Sornasse
rlw268
Level III

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

Well thank you, I did it with a calculator and thats where I got the 49 answer. Thank you for doing it out!
Metin_Tueluemen
Level III

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

probably you used "e" in calculator which is 2,71828. Try 10^-57

Recommended Articles