cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-307974%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EEffektzusammenfassung%20und%20Logworth%20mit%20p-Wert%20von%200%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-307974%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EHallo%2C%20kann%20mir%20jemand%20helfen%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EIch%20f%C3%BChre%20eine%20logistische%20Regression%20mit%20zwei%20x-Variablen%20durch.%20Unten%20wird%20meine%20Effektzusammenfassung%20mit%20dem%20Logwert%20angezeigt.%20Jetzt%20verstehe%20ich%2C%20dass%20der%20Logworth-Wert%20grunds%C3%A4tzlich%20den%20-log(p-Wert)%20f%C3%BCr%20jede%20x-Variable%20annimmt%20und%20das%20f%C3%BCr%20den%20p-Wert%200%2C00219%20funktioniert.%20Was%20mich%20verwirrt%2C%20ist%20der%20Log-Wert%20f%C3%BCr%20den%20p-Wert%200%2C0000.%20Wie%20kommt%20er%20auf%2056%2C125%3F%20Dar%C3%BCber%20hinaus%20bin%20ich%20in%20anderen%20Regressionsmodellen%20auf%20unterschiedliche%20Logwerte%20f%C3%BCr%20einen%20p-Wert%20von%200%20gesto%C3%9Fen.%20Kann%20mir%20das%20bitte%20jemand%20erkl%C3%A4ren%2C%20damit%20ich%20mit%20meinem%20Leben%20weitermachen%20kann%3F%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%22jMOP.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22jMOP.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22jMOP.PNG%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F26780i1759E01849E47FB5%2Fimage-size%2Fmedium%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D400%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22jMOP.PNG%22%20alt%3D%22jMOP.PNG%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EDanke%20sch%C3%B6n!!!%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ERachel%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%23Statistiken%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-307974%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EVerbraucher-%20und%20Marktforschung%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-472249%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20Effektzusammenfassung%20und%20Logworth%20mit%20p-Wert%20von%200%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-472249%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EWahrscheinlich%20haben%20Sie%20im%20Rechner%20%E2%80%9Ee%E2%80%9C%20verwendet%2C%20das%202%2C71828%20ist.%20Versuchen%20Sie%20es%20mit%2010%5E-57%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-308039%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20Effektzusammenfassung%20und%20Logworth%20mit%20p-Wert%20von%200%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-308039%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ENun%2C%20vielen%20Dank%2C%20ich%20habe%20es%20mit%20einem%20Taschenrechner%20gemacht%20und%20dort%20die%2049-Antwort%20erhalten.%20Vielen%20Dank%2C%20dass%20Sie%20es%20geschafft%20haben!%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-308038%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20Effektzusammenfassung%20und%20Logworth%20mit%20p-Wert%20von%200%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-308038%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ESehen%20wir%20uns%20noch%20einmal%20an%3A%20Log10%20(7%2C5e-57)%20%3D%20Log10%20(7%2C5)%20%2B%20Log10%20(e-57)%20%3D%20Log10%20(7%2C5)%20-%2057%20%3D%200%2C875%20-%2057%20%3D%20-56%2C125%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-308037%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20Effektzusammenfassung%20und%20Logworth%20mit%20p-Wert%20von%200%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-308037%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3E-log10%20gibt%2049%2C8785%20zur%C3%BCck%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-308036%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20Effektzusammenfassung%20und%20Logworth%20mit%20p-Wert%20von%200%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-308036%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ESind%20Sie%20sicher%2C%20dass%20Sie%20-Log10%20verwendet%20haben%3F%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20Am%20besten%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20TS%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-307997%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20Effektzusammenfassung%20und%20Logworth%20mit%20p-Wert%20von%200%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-307997%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F2687%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40txnelson%3C%2FA%3E%20Nun%2C%20danke%2C%20denn%20ich%20wusste%20nicht%2C%20dass%20ich%20das%20kann.%20Abgesehen%20davon%20ist%20der%20Wert%207%2C5e-57%2C%20aber%20wenn%20ich%20das%20-log%20davon%20nehme%2C%20wird%20mir%20das%20angezeigt%3CSPAN%3E%2049.8784920133.%20Ich%20bin%20also%20n%C3%A4her%20dran%2C%20aber%20immer%20noch%20nicht%20genau%20richtig.%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-307995%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20Effektzusammenfassung%20und%20Logworth%20mit%20p-Wert%20von%200%3F%3F%3F%3F%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-307995%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EVersuchen%20Sie%20es%20mit%20einem%20Doppelklick%20auf%20den%20p-Wert%20und%20%C3%A4ndern%20Sie%20das%20Format%2C%20um%20mehr%20Dezimalstellen%20anzuzeigen%2C%20um%20zu%20sehen%2C%20wie%20hoch%20der%20tats%C3%A4chliche%20p-Wert%20ist.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
rlw268
Level III

Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

Hi can someone help me?

 

I am running logistic regression with two x variables below shows my effect summary with the logworth. Now I understand the logworth basically takes the -log(p-value) for each x variable and that works for the p-value 0.00219. What i am confused about is the logworth of for the p-value 0.0000, how is it getting 56.125? Moreover in other regression models I've run into different logworths for p-value  of 0. Can someone please explain this to me so I can move on with my life?jMOP.PNG

 

Thank you!!!

 

Rachel

 

#statistics

3 ACCEPTED SOLUTIONS

Accepted Solutions
txnelson
Super User

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

try double clicking on the p-value and change the format to show more decimal places to see what the actual p-value is.

Jim

View solution in original post

Thierry_S
Super User

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

Are you sure you used -Log10?
Best,
TS
Thierry R. Sornasse

View solution in original post

Thierry_S
Super User

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

Let's review: Log10 (7.5e-57) = Log10 (7.5) + Log10 (e-57) = Log10 (7.5) - 57 = 0.875 - 57 = -56.125
Thierry R. Sornasse

View solution in original post

7 REPLIES 7
txnelson
Super User

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

try double clicking on the p-value and change the format to show more decimal places to see what the actual p-value is.

Jim
rlw268
Level III

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

@txnelson well thank you cause i didn't realize I could do that. With that being said the value is 7.5e-57 but when I take the -log of that it gives me 49.8784920133. So I'm closer but still not spot on. 

Thierry_S
Super User

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

Are you sure you used -Log10?
Best,
TS
Thierry R. Sornasse
rlw268
Level III

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

-log10 returns 49.8785

Thierry_S
Super User

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

Let's review: Log10 (7.5e-57) = Log10 (7.5) + Log10 (e-57) = Log10 (7.5) - 57 = 0.875 - 57 = -56.125
Thierry R. Sornasse
rlw268
Level III

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

Well thank you, I did it with a calculator and thats where I got the 49 answer. Thank you for doing it out!
Metin_Tueluemen
Level III

Re: Effect Summary and the Logworth with p-value of 0????

probably you used "e" in calculator which is 2,71828. Try 10^-57

Recommended Articles