cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • JMP will suspend normal business operations for our Winter Holiday beginning on Wednesday, Dec. 24, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. ET (2:00 p.m. ET for JMP Accounts Receivable).
    Regular business hours will resume at 9:00 a.m. EST on Friday, Jan. 2, 2026.
  • We’re retiring the File Exchange at the end of this year. The JMP Marketplace is now your destination for add-ins and extensions.
JMP Bar Chart

Welcome to the JMP User Community!

Ask questions, get answers, meet other JMP users

Learning Resources

Latest Discussions

  • Significant Lack of Fit

    Hi All, I appreciate your time and response. I have built a model using main effects, interactions, and sometimes 2nd orders. I have used Standard Least Squares and 60% of the data. About 20% is used for validation and 20% for test sets.R2, adj R2, and those for validation and test sets are all about 98-99%. VIFs are all between 1 to 2.The only issue is I have a significant lack of fit.What can I ...

    Amir_H Amir_H
    Discussions |
    Apr 13, 2021 1:38 PM
    4111 views | 4 replies
  • How to use a validation column in normal JMP15 (not JMP Pro)

    Hi, I would like to build predictive models using Partition, Logistic Regression and Neural Networks for my categorical response Y (Pass or Fail) in JMP 15. I do not have the JMP Pro version. I was able to create a validation column containing Training, Validation and Test sets. How can I use the validation column in the normal version of JMP when building and evaluating the models? Partition and ...

    JMPPRO JMPPRO
    Discussions |
    Apr 11, 2021 10:51 AM
    3139 views | 3 replies
  • deployment model

    Hito everybody.In attached 2 jmp files. The one named Training-validation-test was used to build a RF model with the following results.The file contains one numeric response and 20 different predictors with one of them categorical, The predictors are sensors values.     As you can see the Bias is very good while the variance is slightly high (92-69=23%).Then a new database with examples never seen...

    FR60 FR60
    Discussions |
    Apr 11, 2021 6:11 AM
    12219 views | 13 replies
  • Missing Data and SVM

    I have started using the Support Vector Machines platform but it appears that predictions are missing for observations that are missing a continuous factor.  There is no informative missing setting for SVM, but the prediction formula shows that missing nominal data is used in the formula.  However, when a continuous factor is missing, then the prediction is missing (and the prediction formula does...

    dale_lehman dale_lehman
    Discussions |
    Apr 7, 2021 10:31 AM
    2507 views | 4 replies
  • Why am I getting no K-fold validation for my linear regression? It only shows "."

    Doing a linear regression, and both in stepwise and in the final model output it only shows "." under K-fold cross-validation? Why? I recall seeing a K-fold # for my previous model, though I don't remember the exact section or screen. 

    chriscic42 chriscic42
    Discussions |
    Apr 5, 2021 5:36 AM
    1479 views | 1 replies

Latest Discussions

  • Significant Lack of Fit

    Hi All, I appreciate your time and response. I have built a model using main effects, interactions, and sometimes 2nd orders. I have used Standard Least Squares and 60% of the data. About 20% is used for validation and 20% for test sets.R2, adj R2, and those for validation and test sets are all about 98-99%. VIFs are all between 1 to 2.The only issue is I have a significant lack of fit.What can I ...

    Amir_H Amir_H
    Discussions |
    Apr 13, 2021 1:38 PM
    4111 views | 4 replies
  • deployment model

    Hito everybody.In attached 2 jmp files. The one named Training-validation-test was used to build a RF model with the following results.The file contains one numeric response and 20 different predictors with one of them categorical, The predictors are sensors values.     As you can see the Bias is very good while the variance is slightly high (92-69=23%).Then a new database with examples never seen...

    FR60 FR60
    Discussions |
    Apr 11, 2021 6:11 AM
    12219 views | 13 replies
  • Why am I getting no K-fold validation for my linear regression? It only shows "."

    Doing a linear regression, and both in stepwise and in the final model output it only shows "." under K-fold cross-validation? Why? I recall seeing a K-fold # for my previous model, though I don't remember the exact section or screen. 

    chriscic42 chriscic42
    Discussions |
    Apr 5, 2021 5:36 AM
    1479 views | 1 replies
  • Calculating effect size

    I have a data set of about 2000 patients. There are two groups one with the critical illness and others with known critical illness.I have done a univariate comparison between the two groups based on a there are age (continuous variable) and a number of other categorical variables like sex or race comorbidities et cetera.Because of the relatively large dataset most of the differences come back as ...

    Sandeep123 Sandeep123
    Discussions |
    Mar 29, 2021 12:51 PM
    11258 views | 11 replies
  • Finlay Wilkinson Analysis

    I am totally new to JMP and statistics. Can anyone share a learning material about Finlay-Wilkinson Regression and how to execute it in JMP15. We are going to use this in our field crop experiments. Thank you in advance!!

    Engr6216 Engr6216
    Discussions |
    Mar 24, 2021 4:59 PM
    2260 views | 4 replies

Latest Discussions

  • What does it mean when the solution path for Elastic Net is not single-valued?

    Dear JMP Community,   (W10, 64-bit, JMP Pro 15.2.1)   I am running a model to assess the active predictors. I am doing this by using the Autovalidation add-in to generate a Null Factor for my data. I then use the GenReg platform to find estimates for each possible X-factor and then Bootstrap those estimates to get a better assessment of the contributions to the response. I came across a very stran...

    SDF1 SDF1
    Discussions |
    Feb 15, 2021 12:35 PM
    1445 views | 0 replies
view all discussions