cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
JMP Bar Chart

Welcome to the JMP User Community!

Ask questions, get answers, meet other JMP users

Learning Resources

Latest Discussions

  • Help using JSL to extract fit parameters from Fit Curve platform

    I am fairly new to the JSL coding and I have been struggling to automate a workflow involving the Fit Curve platform.  Here is what I am trying to automate: Step 1: Fit Curve Exponential 2P model to data by providing X, Y, and BY data.  Script code below works fine. Step 2: Collect fit parameters: Scale and Growth Rate (I wish this was just "a" and "b") for each Sample ID and create a new Table th...

    DBarton DBarton
    Discussions |
    Apr 23, 2026 8:59 AM
    285 views | 4 replies
  • Explorateur de données fonctionnelles Courbe cible

    Bonjour,  Dans l'explorateur de données fonctionnelles, est-ce qu'il est possible de définir en désirabilité une courbe cible? Car lorsque je suis dans Profileur de plan d'expérience fonctionnel, je n'arrive pas à définir ma désirabilité sur l'ensemble de la courbe mais uniquement sur un point X.  De même, dans simulateur, est-il possible de construire une table de données avec un certains nombres...

    SquaresJackal10 SquaresJackal10
    Discussions |
    Apr 23, 2026 7:56 AM
    335 views | 5 replies
  • JMP Community Question Title: Graph Builder with Local Data Filter producing wrong output in JMP 16 - works in JMP 14

    Hi, I have the following JSL code that creates a Graph Builder plot inside a For loop. It works correctly in JMP 14 but produces wrong output in JMP 16. JMP 14 Code (works correctly): gb = Expr( dt << Graph Builder( Size( 635, 338 ), Show Control Panel( 0 ), Variables( X( :Time Point Months ), Y( :Result ), Overlay( :Batch ) ), Elements( Points( X...

    ConvergentWhale ConvergentWhale
    Discussions |
    Apr 23, 2026 6:53 AM
    548 views | 6 replies
  • How do i update the graph builder from Jmp version 14 to 16?

    Hi, I have the following JSL code that creates a Graph Builder plot inside a For loop. It works correctly in JMP 14 but produces wrong output in JMP 16. JMP 14 Code (works correctly): gb = Expr( dt << Graph Builder( Size( 635, 338 ), Show Control Panel( 0 ), Variables( X( :Time Point Months ), Y( :Result ), Overlay( :Batch ) ), Elements( Points( X, Y...

    ConvergentWhale ConvergentWhale
    Discussions |
    Apr 23, 2026 6:28 AM
    157 views | 1 replies
  • Inquiry regarding the "Measurement Invariance" feature in JMP Student Edition

    I am currently using JMP Student Edition to perform Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analyses, and I am writing to inquire about the multiple group analysis (Measurement Invariance testing) feature. [My Environment] Operating System: macOS 26.4.1 Software: JMP Student Edition 19.1.0 [Analysis Objective] I am trying to perform a measurement invariance test (evaluating configural, metric, scala...

    BoostingPuma370 BoostingPuma370
    Discussions |
    Apr 23, 2026 12:52 AM
    238 views | 2 replies

Latest Discussions

  • Help using JSL to extract fit parameters from Fit Curve platform

    I am fairly new to the JSL coding and I have been struggling to automate a workflow involving the Fit Curve platform.  Here is what I am trying to automate: Step 1: Fit Curve Exponential 2P model to data by providing X, Y, and BY data.  Script code below works fine. Step 2: Collect fit parameters: Scale and Growth Rate (I wish this was just "a" and "b") for each Sample ID and create a new Table th...

    DBarton DBarton
    Discussions |
    Apr 23, 2026 8:59 AM
    285 views | 4 replies
  • How do i update the graph builder from Jmp version 14 to 16?

    Hi, I have the following JSL code that creates a Graph Builder plot inside a For loop. It works correctly in JMP 14 but produces wrong output in JMP 16. JMP 14 Code (works correctly): gb = Expr( dt << Graph Builder( Size( 635, 338 ), Show Control Panel( 0 ), Variables( X( :Time Point Months ), Y( :Result ), Overlay( :Batch ) ), Elements( Points( X, Y...

    ConvergentWhale ConvergentWhale
    Discussions |
    Apr 23, 2026 6:28 AM
    157 views | 1 replies
  • Bartlett Test in PCA Output: Exact Statistic and Degrees of Freedom in JMP

    Hi everyone, I am trying to better understand the Bartlett test reported in the Principal Components output in JMP, specifically the one shown in the “Eigenvalues” table with Chi-square, DF, and p-values for each component. From the documentation, I understand that this test is used to assess whether the remaining eigenvalues are equal (i.e., a test of homogeneity after extracting the first k prin...

    happy happy
    Discussions |
    Apr 22, 2026 8:46 AM
    169 views | 1 replies
  • JMP 19 Python Integration: ValueError: year 0 when converting Data Table to Pandas

    Hello Everyone,  I am upgrading my scripts from JMP18  to JMP19  and 'm hitting a particular roadblock with this integration. In JMP 18, I used custom function to loop through columns and create Pandas DataFrame. It worked perfectly. However in JMP19, the exact code throws a ValueError: year 0 is out of range.  Here is the snippet:  Python Send("raw_data"); def jmp_to_pandas(jmp_table): co...

    zetaVagabond1 zetaVagabond1
    Discussions |
    Apr 22, 2026 6:39 AM
    256 views | 2 replies
  • It turns out this expert also uses Gemini for guidance on writing JSL

    I have always been using Gemini 3.1 Pro to help me write Python code for the JMP environment.
    Today, I saw that this expert is also using Gemini for guidance! https://community.jmp.com/t5/Abstracts/Data-Analysis-Generative-AI-and-the-Human-Factor-2026-EU-30MP/ev-p/916571  Thanks Experts!

    lwx228 lwx228
    Discussions |
    Apr 22, 2026 12:21 AM
    338 views | 3 replies

Latest Discussions

  • defining function scope changes how result is returned

    Why don't all three of these return their unevaluated argument like the first one does? Is there a way to make the last two work like the first? Inside the function, e is still unevaluated, this seems to happen when the result is returned. names default to here(1); ns = New Namespace("n"); foo = function({e}, Name Expr(e) ); ns:bar = function({e}, Name Expr(e) ); show( foo( expr( notavar...

    ih ih
    Discussions |
    Apr 20, 2026 1:45 PM
    154 views | 0 replies
  • How does JMP bias the rate of count when calculating the probability of Partition platform with categorical responses?

    For categorical responses Partition has the response rates that are slightly biased away from zero to avoid having attributed probabilities of zero. I would like to know how to calcurate the biased probabilities.

    Takashi Takashi
    Discussions |
    Apr 16, 2026 8:41 PM
    147 views | 0 replies
  • Nested Two Way Anova Help?

    Hi, I am trying to analyze calcium transient data from cardiomyocytes. I moved to JMP because Prism cannot do a two way ANOVA on nested data but I cannot figure out how to run this analysis. I have 4 experimental groups (WT SHAM, KO SHAM, WT OVX, KO OVX) across two factors (genotype (WT/KO) and surgery (SHAM/OVX)) but I don't know how to add these variables prior to running analyses. For each anim...

    ClusterSeal6941 ClusterSeal6941
    Discussions |
    Apr 14, 2026 12:36 PM
    349 views | 0 replies
  • Help with PPK on one-sided data which includes zeros

    I’m trying to calculate an appropriate PPK for data with the following criteria: Data lies between 0 and +InifinityA significant portion of the data is exactly 0, and this represents an actual true 0Has an Upper Spec limit onlyHeavily Skewed The distribution should be an appropriate distribution for the data. What’s the best way to get JMP to do this?

    david707 david707
    Discussions |
    Apr 8, 2026 8:59 AM
    325 views | 0 replies
  • Best practice in FDE when the main variation is a shift along X (phase variation) rather than a change in shape?

    Hello JMP community, I have been testing Functional Data Explorer on a synthetic data set where each curve is essentially the same motif translated along the X-axis, with little intrinsic change in amplitude or shape. In this situation, my impression is that the resulting FPCA/FPC basis becomes increasingly oscillatory, and the physical interpretation becomes difficult. In other words, one simple...

    Florent_M Florent_M
    Discussions |
    Mar 17, 2026 9:29 AM
    273 views | 0 replies
view all discussions