cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • DownloadSemiconductor Toolkit: Tools to create wafer maps, add wafer geometry to graphics, explore die defects & compare wafers.
  • Discovery Summit 2026: Early User Edition - September 23-24.Register. It's free.
  • Use JMP Clinical with CDISC-compliant data. Review studies, ID safety and efficacy signals & communicate findings with interactive graphics. Register to see how. Aug. 27, 2 pm US ET.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
happy
Level II

Bartlett Test in PCA Output: Exact Statistic and Degrees of Freedom in JMP

Hi everyone,

I am trying to better understand the Bartlett test reported in the Principal Components output in JMP, specifically the one shown in the “Eigenvalues” table with Chi-square, DF, and p-values for each component.

From the documentation, I understand that this test is used to assess whether the remaining eigenvalues are equal (i.e., a test of homogeneity after extracting the first k principal components). However, I would like to clarify the exact form of the test used in JMP:

  1. What is the exact test statistic used for this Bartlett test?
    Is it based on a likelihood ratio involving the remaining eigenvalues (for example, using logarithms of ratios relative to their mean)?
  2. In the correction term of the statistic, is the number of remaining components (m = p − k) used, or the total number of variables (p)?
  3. The reported degrees of freedom are sometimes non-integers.
    Does JMP apply an additional correction or approximation to the degrees of freedom?
  4. Is this implementation directly based on Bartlett (1937, 1954), or are there JMP-specific modifications?

I would appreciate any clarification or references regarding the exact formulation used.

Thank you!

1 REPLY 1

Re: Bartlett Test in PCA Output: Exact Statistic and Degrees of Freedom in JMP

If the documentation and references there in are not sufficient, then you might reach out to JMP Technical Support ([email protected]) for further details. Keep in mind that some aspects of the implementation are proprietary and, therefore, confidential.

Recommended Articles