cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • New to JMP? Join us Sept. 23-24 for the Early User Edition of Discovery Summit, tailor-made for new users. Register now for free!
  • Your voice matters! Tell us how you prefer to receive JMP updates, so we can tailor our communication to your needs. Take short survey.
  • See how to access JMP Marketplace - and - find, create & share add-ins to extend your JMP. Watch video.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
cfs_analyst
Level II

Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

I have a reliability dataset where some of the readouts did not have any fails. Do I merge these readouts with the ones that have fails or include them separately? 

Please refer to Setup1 Vs Setup2 in the snippet below [JMP file attached too]. Weibull alpha and beta parameters between Setup1 and Setup2 are drastically different. To me, setup2 seems reasonable since it includes complete information.

 

cfs_analyst_0-1718720708812.png

 

2 ACCEPTED SOLUTIONS

Accepted Solutions
cfs_analyst
Level II

Re: Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

@JerryFish , @DonMcCormack Could you offer any insight on this? Thank you :)

View solution in original post

cfs_analyst
Level II

Re: Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

This issue has been resolved. Setup1 Time_low entries need to be corrected. For e.g. Row4 Time_low entry should be 700, not 200.

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
cfs_analyst
Level II

Re: Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

@JerryFish , @DonMcCormack Could you offer any insight on this? Thank you :)

cfs_analyst
Level II

Re: Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

This issue has been resolved. Setup1 Time_low entries need to be corrected. For e.g. Row4 Time_low entry should be 700, not 200.

Recommended Articles