cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-766800%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3EFrequency%3D0%20in%20Life%20Distribution%20Platform%20in%20Reliability%20Analysis%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-766800%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EI%20have%20a%20reliability%20dataset%20where%20some%20of%20the%20readouts%20did%20not%20have%20any%20fails.%20Do%20I%20merge%20these%20readouts%20with%20the%20ones%20that%20have%20fails%20or%20include%20them%20separately%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EPlease%20refer%20to%20Setup1%20Vs%20Setup2%20in%20the%20snippet%20below%20%5BJMP%20file%20attached%20too%5D.%20Weibull%20alpha%20and%20beta%20parameters%20between%20Setup1%20and%20Setup2%20are%20drastically%20different.%20To%20me%2C%20setup2%20seems%20reasonable%20since%20it%20includes%20complete%20information.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%22cfs_analyst_0-1718720708812.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22cfs_analyst_0-1718720708812.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20289px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22cfs_analyst_0-1718720708812.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20289px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22cfs_analyst_0-1718720708812.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20289px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F65367i36AA7DDE835AB5C5%2Fimage-size%2Fmedium%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D400%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22cfs_analyst_0-1718720708812.png%22%20alt%3D%22cfs_analyst_0-1718720708812.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-766800%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EReliability%20Analysis%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-767079%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3ERe%3A%20Frequency%3D0%20in%20Life%20Distribution%20Platform%20in%20Reliability%20Analysis%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-767079%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F8239%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40JerryFish%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3B%2C%26nbsp%3B%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F5080%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40DonMcCormack%3C%2FA%3E%26nbsp%3BCould%20you%20offer%20any%20insight%20on%20this%3F%20Thank%20you%20%3CLI-EMOJI%20id%3D%22lia_slightly-smiling-face%22%20title%3D%22%3Acara_con_una_leve_sonrisa%3A%22%3E%3C%2FLI-EMOJI%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-767110%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3ERe%3A%20Frequency%3D0%20in%20Life%20Distribution%20Platform%20in%20Reliability%20Analysis%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-767110%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EThis%20issue%20has%20been%20resolved.%20Setup1%20Time_low%20entries%20need%20to%20be%20corrected.%20For%20e.g.%20Row4%20Time_low%20entry%20should%20be%20700%2C%20not%20200.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
cfs_analyst
Level II

Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

I have a reliability dataset where some of the readouts did not have any fails. Do I merge these readouts with the ones that have fails or include them separately? 

Please refer to Setup1 Vs Setup2 in the snippet below [JMP file attached too]. Weibull alpha and beta parameters between Setup1 and Setup2 are drastically different. To me, setup2 seems reasonable since it includes complete information.

 

cfs_analyst_0-1718720708812.png

 

2 ACCEPTED SOLUTIONS

Accepted Solutions
cfs_analyst
Level II

Re: Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

@JerryFish , @DonMcCormack Could you offer any insight on this? Thank you

View solution in original post

cfs_analyst
Level II

Re: Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

This issue has been resolved. Setup1 Time_low entries need to be corrected. For e.g. Row4 Time_low entry should be 700, not 200.

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
cfs_analyst
Level II

Re: Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

@JerryFish , @DonMcCormack Could you offer any insight on this? Thank you

cfs_analyst
Level II

Re: Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

This issue has been resolved. Setup1 Time_low entries need to be corrected. For e.g. Row4 Time_low entry should be 700, not 200.

Recommended Articles