cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • New to JMP? Join us Sept. 23-24 for the Early User Edition of Discovery Summit, tailor-made for new users. Register now for free!
  • Use World Cup data to build models, explore spatial relationships, and create informative visualizations in JMP. Register. July 17, 2 pm US Eastern Time.
  • Your voice matters! Tell us how you prefer to receive JMP updates, so we can tailor our communication to your needs. Take short survey.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
cfs_analyst
Level II

Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

I have a reliability dataset where some of the readouts did not have any fails. Do I merge these readouts with the ones that have fails or include them separately? 

Please refer to Setup1 Vs Setup2 in the snippet below [JMP file attached too]. Weibull alpha and beta parameters between Setup1 and Setup2 are drastically different. To me, setup2 seems reasonable since it includes complete information.

 

cfs_analyst_0-1718720708812.png

 

2 ACCEPTED SOLUTIONS

Accepted Solutions
cfs_analyst
Level II

Re: Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

@JerryFish , @DonMcCormack Could you offer any insight on this? Thank you :)

View solution in original post

cfs_analyst
Level II

Re: Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

This issue has been resolved. Setup1 Time_low entries need to be corrected. For e.g. Row4 Time_low entry should be 700, not 200.

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
cfs_analyst
Level II

Re: Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

@JerryFish , @DonMcCormack Could you offer any insight on this? Thank you :)

cfs_analyst
Level II

Re: Frequency=0 in Life Distribution Platform in Reliability Analysis

This issue has been resolved. Setup1 Time_low entries need to be corrected. For e.g. Row4 Time_low entry should be 700, not 200.

Recommended Articles