cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Don’t miss your chance to experience Discovery Summit Europe at our best available rate! Early bird registration through 31 Oct.
  • Image to Table JMP extension imports single or batch images as data tables. Useful to extract curves from pictures or convert image data to curve data to use in analyses like Functional Data Explorer. Download and install the extension.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
MikeKim
Level IV

80% z-value : 1.3?

MikeKim_0-1699837785773.png

Well, above is the 415page of Pharmaceutical Quality by Desing Using JMP.
In above 90% at the last line is the Spec limit (LSL).

I am confusing the 1.3 looks like ensuring 90% Confidence. (1.282)

Can someone say that using 1.3 and this is 80% confidence?

 

I am sorry for the confusing question and many, but please help me.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
MRB3855
Super User

Re: 80% z-value : 1.3?

Hi @MikeKim : The 1.282 is correct for a one-sided 90% interval. And the z-value for a one-sided 90% bound is the same as the z-value for an 80% two-sided interval. So, while the page you reference is not worded very well (and exposes other issues that may be debated), a one-sided bound is appropriate for setting release limits (for a one-sided spec), and 1.282 is the right number for a 90% one-sided bound. For clarity, It should have been written referencing a one-sided bound (90%) rather than two-sided interval (80%), even though the z-value is the same. 

For more detail on this broad subject:

https://alfresco-static-files.s3.amazonaws.com/alfresco_images/pharma/2019/01/15/7b232584-09a9-4472-...

 

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1
MRB3855
Super User

Re: 80% z-value : 1.3?

Hi @MikeKim : The 1.282 is correct for a one-sided 90% interval. And the z-value for a one-sided 90% bound is the same as the z-value for an 80% two-sided interval. So, while the page you reference is not worded very well (and exposes other issues that may be debated), a one-sided bound is appropriate for setting release limits (for a one-sided spec), and 1.282 is the right number for a 90% one-sided bound. For clarity, It should have been written referencing a one-sided bound (90%) rather than two-sided interval (80%), even though the z-value is the same. 

For more detail on this broad subject:

https://alfresco-static-files.s3.amazonaws.com/alfresco_images/pharma/2019/01/15/7b232584-09a9-4472-...

 

Recommended Articles