cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Sign-in to the JMP Community will be unavailable intermittently Dec. 6-7 due to a system update. Thank you for your understanding!
  • We’re retiring the File Exchange at the end of this year. The JMP Marketplace is now your destination for add-ins and extensions.
  • JMP 19 is here! Learn more about the new features.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
MikeKim
Level IV

80% z-value : 1.3?

MikeKim_0-1699837785773.png

Well, above is the 415page of Pharmaceutical Quality by Desing Using JMP.
In above 90% at the last line is the Spec limit (LSL).

I am confusing the 1.3 looks like ensuring 90% Confidence. (1.282)

Can someone say that using 1.3 and this is 80% confidence?

 

I am sorry for the confusing question and many, but please help me.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
MRB3855
Super User

Re: 80% z-value : 1.3?

Hi @MikeKim : The 1.282 is correct for a one-sided 90% interval. And the z-value for a one-sided 90% bound is the same as the z-value for an 80% two-sided interval. So, while the page you reference is not worded very well (and exposes other issues that may be debated), a one-sided bound is appropriate for setting release limits (for a one-sided spec), and 1.282 is the right number for a 90% one-sided bound. For clarity, It should have been written referencing a one-sided bound (90%) rather than two-sided interval (80%), even though the z-value is the same. 

For more detail on this broad subject:

https://alfresco-static-files.s3.amazonaws.com/alfresco_images/pharma/2019/01/15/7b232584-09a9-4472-...

 

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1
MRB3855
Super User

Re: 80% z-value : 1.3?

Hi @MikeKim : The 1.282 is correct for a one-sided 90% interval. And the z-value for a one-sided 90% bound is the same as the z-value for an 80% two-sided interval. So, while the page you reference is not worded very well (and exposes other issues that may be debated), a one-sided bound is appropriate for setting release limits (for a one-sided spec), and 1.282 is the right number for a 90% one-sided bound. For clarity, It should have been written referencing a one-sided bound (90%) rather than two-sided interval (80%), even though the z-value is the same. 

For more detail on this broad subject:

https://alfresco-static-files.s3.amazonaws.com/alfresco_images/pharma/2019/01/15/7b232584-09a9-4472-...

 

Recommended Articles