cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • JMP will suspend normal business operations for our Winter Holiday beginning on Wednesday, Dec. 24, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. ET (2:00 p.m. ET for JMP Accounts Receivable).
    Regular business hours will resume at 9:00 a.m. EST on Friday, Jan. 2, 2026.
  • We’re retiring the File Exchange at the end of this year. The JMP Marketplace is now your destination for add-ins and extensions.
JMP Bar Chart

Welcome to the JMP User Community!

Ask questions, get answers, meet other JMP users

Learning Resources

Latest Discussions

  • Cumulative damage platform

    Dear all,I'd like to know if the free JMP trial version includes the cumulative damage platform.Thanks.

    EMartins EMartins
    Discussions |
    Mar 15, 2024 2:48 AM
    989 views | 1 replies
  • Comparing failure rates between two processes

    Process A has 2 fails out of 1000 units and Process B has 4 fails out of 750 units. Point estimates of failure rate are 2/1000 = 0.002 and 4/750 = 0.005 for Process A and B, respectively. How can I use JMP to prove statistical significance of failure rate difference? How do I setup the data table for that? How to put confidence interval around those failure rate estimates to check if intervals are...

    cfs_analyst cfs_analyst
    Discussions |
    Mar 13, 2024 11:47 AM
    3446 views | 5 replies
  • Group homogeneity tests - difference when using right censor and interval censored data

    Hi, can you explain how JMP handles Group homogeneity tests (Logrank, Wilcoxon, Peto-Peto) with different type of event censoring? Are there any differences in methods used by JMP to calculate those tests under different event censoring? I made a 2 populations comparisons in JMP platform Life Distribution - Compare Groups, using same dataset, but with different event censoring definition. For unce...

    Ceg1 Ceg1
    Discussions |
    Mar 7, 2024 6:33 AM
    1208 views | 1 replies
  • DOE Costom Design with standard factors or with Mixture Factors?

    I am facing the following problem:I have a bunch of factors that are ingredients of a solution:Ingredient A (2 - 20%)Ingredient B (0 - 4%)Ingredient C (5 - 20%)whereas behind Ingredient B and C a selection of categorial Ingredients exists.Further, I have several process factors:Pressure 200 - 400Runs 2 - 4 Responses:StabilityCosts Aim of that DOE is to find out which is the best formulation with c...

    JasminL JasminL
    Discussions |
    Feb 28, 2024 2:35 PM
    2064 views | 4 replies
  • how to show "nonparametric overlay" in the output of "Fit life by x"?

    I tried to do “Fit life by X” (fit TTF by voltage), but in the output, somehow “nonparametric overlay” did not show up. I was hoping to see the probability of failure vs time at 80V, 50V, and 15V (use condition), but that plot was not included in the output. I attached the report here. If anyone can take a look and point out went wrong, that would be great. Thank you!

    RenZ RenZ
    Discussions |
    Jan 22, 2024 10:02 AM
    704 views | 0 replies

Latest Discussions

  • Cumulative damage platform

    Dear all,I'd like to know if the free JMP trial version includes the cumulative damage platform.Thanks.

    EMartins EMartins
    Discussions |
    Mar 15, 2024 2:48 AM
    989 views | 1 replies
  • Group homogeneity tests - difference when using right censor and interval censored data

    Hi, can you explain how JMP handles Group homogeneity tests (Logrank, Wilcoxon, Peto-Peto) with different type of event censoring? Are there any differences in methods used by JMP to calculate those tests under different event censoring? I made a 2 populations comparisons in JMP platform Life Distribution - Compare Groups, using same dataset, but with different event censoring definition. For unce...

    Ceg1 Ceg1
    Discussions |
    Mar 7, 2024 6:33 AM
    1208 views | 1 replies
  • DOE Costom Design with standard factors or with Mixture Factors?

    I am facing the following problem:I have a bunch of factors that are ingredients of a solution:Ingredient A (2 - 20%)Ingredient B (0 - 4%)Ingredient C (5 - 20%)whereas behind Ingredient B and C a selection of categorial Ingredients exists.Further, I have several process factors:Pressure 200 - 400Runs 2 - 4 Responses:StabilityCosts Aim of that DOE is to find out which is the best formulation with c...

    JasminL JasminL
    Discussions |
    Feb 28, 2024 2:35 PM
    2064 views | 4 replies
  • how to show "nonparametric overlay" in the output of "Fit life by x"?

    I tried to do “Fit life by X” (fit TTF by voltage), but in the output, somehow “nonparametric overlay” did not show up. I was hoping to see the probability of failure vs time at 80V, 50V, and 15V (use condition), but that plot was not included in the output. I attached the report here. If anyone can take a look and point out went wrong, that would be great. Thank you!

    RenZ RenZ
    Discussions |
    Jan 22, 2024 10:02 AM
    704 views | 0 replies
  • Finding the mean, sigma, or median for a column certain conditions

    Hi all, I'm trying to find the mean, median and sigma for a column with certain conditions. For example, I need to get the mean for a test at certain frequency and a certain bandwidth.  Something like this: Col Mean where ( :column1 < Limit & :BW == Y & :Freq == XXX );  your help is appreciated :)

    RA899 RA899
    Discussions |
    Dec 6, 2023 1:24 AM
    3334 views | 5 replies

Latest Discussions

  • how to show "nonparametric overlay" in the output of "Fit life by x"?

    I tried to do “Fit life by X” (fit TTF by voltage), but in the output, somehow “nonparametric overlay” did not show up. I was hoping to see the probability of failure vs time at 80V, 50V, and 15V (use condition), but that plot was not included in the output. I attached the report here. If anyone can take a look and point out went wrong, that would be great. Thank you!

    RenZ RenZ
    Discussions |
    Jan 22, 2024 10:02 AM
    704 views | 0 replies
  • Caution: Places where Jmp does something unexpected

    Definitely, JMP is Not a Spreadsheet . And that's great!! Besides this difference, there are other places where Jmp doesn't do/behave/produce what a newbie / innocent Jmp user expects.
    If a user knows these issues and the remedies and workarounds -  he/she can
    a) save a lot of time b) be safe from data loss c) be sure that the results are as expected.

    [More Topic Containers like this]   Topicdescrip...

    hogi hogi
    Discussions |
    Nov 17, 2023 4:15 AM
    1404 views | 0 replies
  • Combine Rule

    Referring to Rules: Stepwise Regression Control Panel (jmp.com) and Example of the Combine Rule : JMP Help Could somebody please further elaborate on the 2 tests when considering the entry for a term. It would also be immensely helpful if the explanation was based on stepwise backward selection. "Calculates p-values for two separate tests when considering entry for a term that has precedents. The ...

    CorpVi CorpVi
    Discussions |
    Jun 12, 2023 2:59 AM
    907 views | 0 replies
  • July/August classes from JMP Education

    JMP Education is offering upcoming classes with a live instructor. Links go to the page in the course catalog with more information and a link to register. July 26-29: JMP: Reliability Analysis for Non-Repairable Systems August 9-12: JMP Pro: Analyzing Curves and Profiles Using the Functional Data Explorer August 16-19: JMP: Statistical Decisions Using ANOVA and Regression August 29-September 1: J...

    Di_Michelson Di_Michelson
    Discussions |
    Jul 11, 2022 8:50 AM
    778 views | 0 replies
  • Friedman post hoc analysis

    Hello, I am trying to do a matched sample analysis across three different factors. I wanted to:1. Confirm that my sample would be what I pick for 'Block" when I do Fit Y by X when running Friedman's test2. Is there a post hoc analysis in JMP that I can use? I dont see Nemenyi or Conover as an optionThanks for your time.  

    pnakashe pnakashe
    Discussions |
    May 5, 2022 12:02 PM
    1133 views | 0 replies
view all discussions