cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • JMP will suspend normal business operations for our Winter Holiday beginning on Wednesday, Dec. 24, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. ET (2:00 p.m. ET for JMP Accounts Receivable).
    Regular business hours will resume at 9:00 a.m. EST on Friday, Jan. 2, 2026.
  • We’re retiring the File Exchange at the end of this year. The JMP Marketplace is now your destination for add-ins and extensions.
JMP Bar Chart

Welcome to the JMP User Community!

Ask questions, get answers, meet other JMP users

Learning Resources

Latest Discussions

  • add error in profiler

    Hello, I am using JMP Pro 15 and have a DoE with 3 responses (2 continuous and 1 binary).I fitted two linear mixed models for my continuous responses and a GLM (binomial distribution, logit link and firth correction because of separation issues). I wanted to plot the results of my different models in a common profiler. I was able to save the prediction formula for each of the 3 models and the stan...

    PYS PYS
    Discussions |
    Sep 13, 2023 12:15 AM
    1468 views | 2 replies
  • Finding values on contour plot

    Hi, I have a contour plot built from raw data (not prediction). Is it possible to find a value on the specific location on contour plot (built from raw data). For instance, I arbitrarily put two points on the contour plot. How can I find the exact values corresponding to those dots?Another question is, does JMP17 Pro have GUI for adding dots on the specific location on contour plot or it has to be...

    BJK_JerseyBoy BJK_JerseyBoy
    Discussions |
    Sep 8, 2023 9:02 AM
    4518 views | 6 replies
  • R square Adjusted for different factors

    Hello: I have a basic question on R square Adjusted.I ran an experiment with three continuous factors and measured the response.Below is the summary of Fit:This means that I was able to capture about 88% of variability in my response.One factor contribution was about 82% and rest was from the other factors and interaction. Now, I realized that I missed one factor to be included in the study. My qu...

    VarunK VarunK
    Discussions |
    Sep 8, 2023 5:23 AM
    2905 views | 2 replies
  • Nested DOE with continous factors?

    In many examples of nested DOE categorical effects are used. Is nesting also possible with a continuous effect that is scaled? Example: suppose one has five emulgators and also the emulgator concentration is a factor; however the concentration range is different for each emulgator. Is it possible to design the experiment with a scaled continuous concentration at three levels -1 0 +1? 

    frankderuyck frankderuyck
    Discussions |
    Sep 8, 2023 3:02 AM
    2187 views | 3 replies
  • Discrete Choice Experiment: Prohibited Combination

    Hi everyone,I would like to design my first DCE. I am going to use 6 attributes that differ in the levels from 2 to 4 levels. However, I have a limitation where there is an impossible combination that may appear; for example, the cheapest product would not be possible to have the best feature. Is there any way for me to select the prohibited combination? Or, is the D-optimal design will always cal...

    andikawp andikawp
    Discussions |
    Sep 6, 2023 7:11 AM
    838 views | 0 replies

Latest Discussions

  • add error in profiler

    Hello, I am using JMP Pro 15 and have a DoE with 3 responses (2 continuous and 1 binary).I fitted two linear mixed models for my continuous responses and a GLM (binomial distribution, logit link and firth correction because of separation issues). I wanted to plot the results of my different models in a common profiler. I was able to save the prediction formula for each of the 3 models and the stan...

    PYS PYS
    Discussions |
    Sep 13, 2023 12:15 AM
    1468 views | 2 replies
  • Nested DOE with continous factors?

    In many examples of nested DOE categorical effects are used. Is nesting also possible with a continuous effect that is scaled? Example: suppose one has five emulgators and also the emulgator concentration is a factor; however the concentration range is different for each emulgator. Is it possible to design the experiment with a scaled continuous concentration at three levels -1 0 +1? 

    frankderuyck frankderuyck
    Discussions |
    Sep 8, 2023 3:02 AM
    2187 views | 3 replies
  • Discrete Choice Experiment: Prohibited Combination

    Hi everyone,I would like to design my first DCE. I am going to use 6 attributes that differ in the levels from 2 to 4 levels. However, I have a limitation where there is an impossible combination that may appear; for example, the cheapest product would not be possible to have the best feature. Is there any way for me to select the prohibited combination? Or, is the D-optimal design will always cal...

    andikawp andikawp
    Discussions |
    Sep 6, 2023 7:11 AM
    838 views | 0 replies
  • I am getting contradicting errors in my repeating mixed model under the effects table

    The issue is that I need my site in the effects table and if I did remove it, I get another error saying I'm missing the site effect.   

    Purpleopple Purpleopple
    Discussions |
    Aug 31, 2023 10:25 AM
    944 views | 1 replies
  • Two step DoE

    Hello Commuinty,
    perhaps it is a question already addressed, but could not find an answer yet. Specifically, it is about setting up a two-stage DoE. In my case a coating of two or more layers. Each layer has its own factors and there are therefore after each coating other responses that can be evaluated. Is there a clever way to create a DoE with JMP.And even more specifically, do I have a way to a...

    MLanger MLanger
    Discussions |
    Aug 30, 2023 8:56 AM
    1859 views | 3 replies

Latest Discussions

  • Discrete Choice Experiment: Prohibited Combination

    Hi everyone,I would like to design my first DCE. I am going to use 6 attributes that differ in the levels from 2 to 4 levels. However, I have a limitation where there is an impossible combination that may appear; for example, the cheapest product would not be possible to have the best feature. Is there any way for me to select the prohibited combination? Or, is the D-optimal design will always cal...

    andikawp andikawp
    Discussions |
    Sep 6, 2023 7:11 AM
    838 views | 0 replies
  • 49 factor dsd design

    When designing dsd with 49 factors and 4 additional runs. Why do I get 109 runs and not 105 runs?

    ConditionalRam9 ConditionalRam9
    Discussions |
    Jul 22, 2023 7:29 AM
    669 views | 0 replies
  • Main Menu("command") - return value?

    If I open a file via open("filename"), the command returns a reference to the data table which can be used as dt = open("filename");If I trigger open viadt = Main Menu("open")it doesn't return a reference to the data table. In general, is there a way, when triggering a command from the Main Menu, to get the return value?e.g. a reference to a data table for a user defined file loader - or an error ...

    hogi hogi
    Discussions |
    Jun 7, 2023 8:42 AM
    746 views | 0 replies
  • how to read the output from Johnson-Neyman plot and floodlight analyisis?

    hi,I have got an add-in from https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMPer-Cable/Who-what-why-and-how-Tools-for-modeling-and-visualizing/bc-p/624293#M842 to implement floodlight analysis through Johnson-Neyman Plot.  according to the table of the example from the linkage above; what does "_c" mean? such as "meaning_c" and overwhelming_c"? focus on my own study, I got a moderator called "SE" which is a contin...

    Rongyu_Kuang Rongyu_Kuang
    Discussions |
    Apr 23, 2023 8:56 AM
    1383 views | 0 replies
  • Response Screening Effect Size - logistic

    Related to the previous post How to get "Effect size" column with Response Screening functionality , I am also wondering how effect size in the response screening platform is calculated, specifically for categorical Y vs continuous X.  JMP help shows:  "When Y is categorical and X is continuous, the effect size is the square root of the average ChiSquare value for the whole model test."  Running b...

    wgardnerQS wgardnerQS
    Discussions |
    Dec 14, 2022 12:54 PM
    1091 views | 0 replies
view all discussions