JMP Wish List

mansaNoob · ‎01-17-2022

By default, filters are set to contains terms, which does not allow for boolean operations. Requesting default filter type to be regEx or if possible, all filter types to allow regEx by default (without explicit setting). Maybe this exists, but I haven't been able to find it. JMP Version 16.x.

jthi · ‎01-13-2022

Add Data Type icon, similarly as Modeling Type already is, to column listings. Most likely best to add as new preference option in Tables menu if some people want to keep old behaviour (but enable by default as it would already help solving issues in Community :)). This should be extended to all column listings which already have Modeling Type visible. Example with Character and Numeric columns (of course JMP has few more) Also quick option to change datatype could be nice, but I guess this could cause issues.

shampton82 · ‎01-01-2022

Hello JMP team, I'd like to suggest the following options for the partition platform: A start over button so that you don't have to press the Prune button a bunch of times to restart a tree An ability to set the minimum split size to a % of the training N qty vs the current option of just a static number The ability to stop splitting on a logworth value (for example, don't split if the splits logworth is below 2) The ability to highlight the rows in the datatable by clicking on the row of the leaf report Thanks for considering these requests! Steve

MShroff · ‎12-31-2021

Hello, Can the Group By option in the Oneway Bivariate Fit platform be enhanced to support grouping by multiple columns? Currently, it only supports one column, which can be limiting. Thank you.

jthi · ‎12-19-2021

Allow user to select multiple subexpressions in formula editor and show them all in Preview. This would make formula creation easier. Also Allow user to make formula expressions preview table to datatable with selected subexpression and formula attached

jthi · ‎12-19-2021

Currently when you make the preview table to datatable you will loose the formula and subexpression formula. It would be helpful to be able to export the formulas to smaller table. Also Allow selection of multiple subexpressions in formula editor

SaLevy · ‎10-12-2021

In making JMP Clinical Reports, currently for Oncology: Tumor Response, the only variables to display are LDIAM and LPERP. These options don't allow us to account for multiple tumors/lesions, as outlined in the RECIST guidelines (https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/docs/Recist_Guideline.pdf). It would be helpful if more options (SUMPPD, PROD PPD, etc.) were included as options for Tumor Results Test for Analysis to accurately display this information for cancers involving multiple tumors. Similarly, for cancers with multiple tumors, it would be helpful if there was a way to indicate which tumor is being represented in the figure, as well as to potentially look at multiple tumors/lesions, or select specific tumors/lesions to look at. This could apply for both the Oncology - Tumor Response Report as well as Tumor Results Waterfall Plots. Thanks, Samantha

Feli · ‎09-23-2021

In Graph Builder, you can show the RMSE to your fit. It would be great if it were possible to show the RMSE in the actual vs predicted plot of PLS etc. For me, that is important diagnostic information when comparing different models.

skoxholt · ‎09-07-2021

I typically have data for multiple product codes and plants in one file (pls see attached example). I would like to do Capability Analysis for each product code and plant in this file. Each product code has a different specification. I would like to pull the specification in from a "Spec Limit" file (pls see attached example). Please note that there are too many product codes in a file for sub-setting each one. It would result in too many files to handle. If it is easier to have a scripting answer short term, I am fine with that. Long term I would like to see it integrated into JMP under the "Manage Spec Limits" option.

mark_anawis · ‎08-31-2021

Add the ability to use Continuous Modeling Type columns as Rows in Tabulate when using the Interactive table option such that every value in the column appears as a separate row rather than showing Sum of all rows. This should be done without changing the modeling type for the Continuous Modeling Type columns in the original data table. Currently, the user has to either a) convert columns to Nominal Modeling Type, use Tabulate with these temporarily Modeling Type-changed columns in Drop zone for rows, then convert these columns back to Continuous Modeling Type OR b) the user has to use Dialog option selecting Continuous Modeling Type columns as Grouping (row labels).

datanaut · ‎08-18-2021

This is a suggestion to add a feature to the main JMP program. I depend on the selection tool to help me choose what I want to paste from graphs into reports of my work. When looking at a graph window (not in a project) I can make this list of tools always visible by customizing (nice): When viewing a graph within a project, I cannot. I can access the menu and select it there but this becomes laborious switching back and forth constantly. The option to customize the toolbar is there for projects but the choices are limited and do not include the "Tools." I'm on JMP 15.2.1 on Mac OS 11.5.1 Big Sur

rwridle · ‎08-17-2021

A frequent comment I get from former Minitab users is they can't find the p-value in a JMP report. Some p-values are labeled as p-values, others are not. Their experience with Minitab is that the p-values are clearly labeled and easy to find in report outputs. Please consider making the p-values easier find by labeling them simply as "p-value".

ruskicar · ‎07-30-2021

MS Excel has a very intuitive and easy to use formula editor, where you can click on any cell in the table and give it a value of "=" + function. Thus, it is very easy to calculate for instance MEAN or STDEV of a selection of columns (i.e., A1:A10) or rows (i.e., A1:J1). Would something like that be possible to implement in JMP? Or maybe it is already possible, but I don't know about.

Feli · ‎07-29-2021

The stacked data table works best for plots of spectral data. However, unlike FDE, PLS cannot work with stacked data and the data table has to be unstacked first. It would be nice if either the PLS would support the stacked format or FDE would include PLS as an option

mgerusdurand · ‎07-28-2021

Bonjour, Souvent j'oublie d'enregistrer le log dans ma fenetre de script lorsque je ferme un projet. Il serait très utile d'avoir un enregistrement automatique pour pouvoir conserver toutes nos démarches. Si cela existe déjà je ne l'ai pas trouvé.... Merci

Benjamin_Fuerst · ‎06-17-2021

Hello, I have some feedback for FDE usage: I would like to set the default values for the set of grids and spline degree for the splines (see picture). In the preferences I do not an option to do this. Being able to control this over preferences or the the model control itself (like a apply to all button) would be an ease for using FDE. Thanks! Ben

danf · ‎06-15-2021

I would love to be able to load constraints just as I load factors and responses. I use space filling designs often and have quite a few constraints on each design. Currently, adding constraints are the time-consuming part of designing experiments for me.

lynnehare · ‎05-12-2021

Currently, we see VIFs only after using the Make Table button and simulating a response, then examining Fit Model output, assuming users have added the VIF option to Preferences or other means of revealing them. But VIFs are design diagnostics, and as such should appear in the design diagnostics section. Making this change or addition will speed user design generation especially for second and higher order models.

caseylott · ‎04-22-2021

Is there a way to set a desired number of terms to show in a Word Cloud? Right now, it seems to max out at 100 terms. In the work I am doing I often find useful terms lower down the list than the top 100.

caseylott · ‎04-22-2021

It would be great to be able to set the number of words that are shown surrounding each instance of a term for the "Show Text" option? Right now, I see the whole document. Many of my documents are long, so I'd prefer to see something like 100 words before and after the term for each use, just enough to get local context. This way, when I have 50 documents that use the term 180 times, I don't have to scroll through the entirety of all 50 documents to get context.

JMP Wish List

Make regEx default for all filters

Add Data Type icon to column listings

Partition Analysis additional options

Bivariate Fit in Oneway - Group By option

Allow selection of multiple subexpressions in formula editor

Allow user to make formula expressions preview table to datatable with selected subexpression and formula attached

JMP Clinical - Tumor Response Options

Show RMSE in Actual by Predicted Diagnostics Plot

Enable multiple specifications (for different product codes / plants) per file for Capability Analysis

Tabulate using Continuous Modeling Type Columns as Rows

Allow Adding "Tools" to Project Toolbar in Customization

Improving the display of p-values

Excel formula plugin

PLS for stacked data tables

Enregistrement automatique du log dans un projet

FDE Model: How do I control the default values of model controls of the splines

allow saving and loading of DOE constraints

Add VIFs to DOE diagnostics

Increase the number of words that can be show in a word cloud

Show less text around each instance of a term when using "Show Text" in Text Explorer