cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • DownloadSemiconductor Toolkit: Tools to create wafer maps, add wafer geometry to graphics, explore die defects & compare wafers.
  • Discovery Summit 2026: Early User Edition - September 23-24.Register. It's free.
  • Use JMP Clinical with CDISC-compliant data. Review studies, ID safety and efficacy signals & communicate findings with interactive graphics. Register to see how. Aug. 27, 2 pm US ET.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
mahroo
Level II

more replications or more runs?

Hi,

I am designing an experiment using custom design in JMP. Number of variables and their levels is high, so I cannot do a full factorial design, but I could have more runs than the minimum that JMP gives me. My question is that which one is better; to have more replications or to have more runs?

Thanks

12 REPLIES 12
mahroo
Level II

Re: more replications or more runs?

That's a good point, but I guess if it does not have any effect on the design of experiment I could consider it later when I will be working on analysis of the results.

louv
Staff (Retired)

Re: more replications or more runs?

Although it is the same number of runs if you look closely at the attached file it does have an effect on the design since the algorithm gives a different set of runs. You sacrifice some power on the main effects to be able to possibly model the interactions. You are banking on the effect sparsity principle and by utilizing a stepwise regression you are hoping to "tease" out a more complex model.

mahroo
Level II

Re: more replications or more runs?

Thanks for all your help

Recommended Articles