cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Try the Materials Informatics Toolkit, which is designed to easily handle SMILES data. This and other helpful add-ins are available in the JMP® Marketplace
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
vestlink
Level II

Repeated randomized 4 by 4 latin square

I have a field setup with 4 treatments in a latin sqaure setup repeated 5 times.

 

A B D C
C A B D
B D C A
D C A B

This field setup is enclosed.

The setup is repeated 5 times but randomized between each run.

9 animals are released into an enclosure and can freely choose from all of the treatments. The number of times an animal visit a treatment is recorded and summarized for a period of times (1 hour) for each repeated setup.

The same 9 animals are used between the 5 repeats.

 

My guess that the animal (ID) within each repeat sjould be random effect.

 

I want to know if there is significant differences in use of treatment. Maybe not between the animal nor between the repeated setups.

 

What is the correct methods to analyse this in JMP?

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

Re: Repeated randomized 4 by 4 latin square

This is not a Latin Square design. You might have selected a Latin square for the layout of the grid but the design and associated analysis are for experiments that run one of the sixteen treatments at a time over changing levels of two blocking factors. (See the JMP table that I provided for a Latin Square experiment.) The design supports the linear model that decomposes the fixed effects of the three factors and accounts for the single source of random errors.

 

Instead, you are simultaneously presenting sixteen locations labelled A-D in a grid, recording the location of nine animals at regular intervals and accumulating the counts. I have seen neither such an experiment nor the model for the data analysis. If this approach is common in your field, then you might consult a reference or expert to discern the model. If you can tell us the data set layout and the model, then we can help you analyze it in JMP.

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3

Re: Repeated randomized 4 by 4 latin square

The response is the number of visits in a one hour run. You have one categorical factor with four levels (A, B, C, D). You have two blocking factors each with four runs. (You did not specify the nature of the two blocking factors.) There are a total of sixteen runs times five replicates. Here is the set up of your Latin Square design in JMP for the proper analysis:

 

Capture.PNG

 

That might not be what you intend to do ("freely choose from all of the treatments"). The design presents one treatment at a time. Is that clear?

 

You could enter the replicate values in the same row and then stack these response columns before analysis or you could add four replicates of these rows and enter the observations in one column as shown.

 

It is not clear about how the nine subjects are used in this experiment ("9 animals are released into an enclosure "). Are they tested individually (one at a time) or together (nine at the same time)? The answer will determine how the effect of the animals enters the model.

 

See Help > Books > Fitting Linear Models for more details.

vestlink
Level II

Re: Repeated randomized 4 by 4 latin square

Hi.

 

Thank you for your reply.

 

All animals are released at the same time in the 4x4 enclosures. And every 10 sec the position of the animals in a given RxC (e.g. A1) are recorded.

 

Nicolai

Re: Repeated randomized 4 by 4 latin square

This is not a Latin Square design. You might have selected a Latin square for the layout of the grid but the design and associated analysis are for experiments that run one of the sixteen treatments at a time over changing levels of two blocking factors. (See the JMP table that I provided for a Latin Square experiment.) The design supports the linear model that decomposes the fixed effects of the three factors and accounts for the single source of random errors.

 

Instead, you are simultaneously presenting sixteen locations labelled A-D in a grid, recording the location of nine animals at regular intervals and accumulating the counts. I have seen neither such an experiment nor the model for the data analysis. If this approach is common in your field, then you might consult a reference or expert to discern the model. If you can tell us the data set layout and the model, then we can help you analyze it in JMP.