cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-871542%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3EProblema%20di%20multicollinarit%C3%A0%20in%20un%20modello%20di%20rischio%20proporzionale%20di%20Cox%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-871542%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3ECiao%20a%20tutti%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CBR%20%2F%3E%0A%3CP%20class%3D%22%22%20data-start%3D%22224%22%20data-end%3D%22289%22%3EHo%20bisogno%20di%20aiuto%20per%20comprendere%20e%20risolvere%20il%20seguente%20problema.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20class%3D%22%22%20data-start%3D%22224%22%20data-end%3D%22289%22%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20class%3D%22%22%20data-start%3D%22291%22%20data-end%3D%22682%22%3ESto%20sviluppando%20un%20modello%20per%20prevedere%20lo%20sviluppo%20di%20malattie%20cardiovascolari%20in%20una%20coorte.%20Ho%20incluso%20due%20variabili%20correlate%20tra%20loro%20(R%C2%B2%20%3D%200%2C83).%20Quando%20le%20includo%20entrambe%20nel%20modello%2C%20una%20di%20esse%20cambia%20direzione%3A%20diventa%20%3CEM%20data-start%3D%22537%22%20data-end%3D%22549%22%3Eprotettiva%3C%2FEM%3E%20invece%20che%20un%20%3CEM%20data-start%3D%22563%22%20data-end%3D%22576%22%3Efattore%20di%20rischio%3C%2FEM%3E%20.%20Ma%20quando%20includo%20ciascuna%20variabile%20separatamente%2C%20entrambe%20mostrano%20un'associazione%20positiva%20con%20la%20malattia%2C%20come%20previsto.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20class%3D%22%22%20data-start%3D%22291%22%20data-end%3D%22682%22%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20class%3D%22%22%20data-start%3D%22684%22%20data-end%3D%221051%22%3ENon%20credo%20che%20ci%C3%B2%20sia%20dovuto%20a%20una%20spiegazione%20biologica%3A%20sembra%20pi%C3%B9%20un%20problema%20di%20multicollinearit%C3%A0.%20So%20che%20potrei%20usare%20sia%20il%20VIF%20che%20l'analisi%20delle%20componenti%20principali%20per%20risolvere%20il%20problema.%20Ma%20poich%C3%A9%20il%20mio%20risultato%20%C3%A8%20binario%2C%20non%20sono%20sicuro%20di%20come%20calcolare%20correttamente%20il%20VIF.%20Ho%20provato%20a%20eseguire%20una%20regressione%20con%20i%20minimi%20quadrati%20tra%20le%20due%20variabili%20e%20ho%20ottenuto%20un%20VIF%20pari%20a%201%2C%20ma%20non%20credo%20che%20sia%20l'approccio%20corretto%20in%20questo%20caso.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20class%3D%22%22%20data-start%3D%22684%22%20data-end%3D%221051%22%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%20class%3D%22%22%20data-start%3D%221053%22%20data-end%3D%221136%22%3EQualcuno%20ha%20mai%20affrontato%20una%20situazione%20simile%3F%20Come%20consiglieresti%20di%20affrontare%20la%20situazione%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-871542%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EModellazione%20statistica%20avanzata%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EModellazione%20predittiva%20e%20apprendimento%20automatico%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EFinestre%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%0A%20%0A%20%0A%20%20%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-875810%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3EOggetto%3A%20Problema%20di%20multicollinarit%C3%A0%20in%20un%20modello%20di%20rischio%20proporzionale%20di%20Cox%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%0A%20%20%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-875810%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%0A%20%20%20%3CP%3ECiao%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F68417%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40RafaelZS%3C%2FA%3E%20%2C%3C%2FP%3E%20%0A%20%20%20%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20%0A%20%20%20%3CP%3EHai%20mai%20pensato%20di%20inserire%20semplicemente%20un%20termine%20di%20interazione%20(X1*X2)%20nel%20modello%20per%20vedere%20l'effetto%20sui%20risultati%20del%20modello%20e%20sui%20valori%20VIF%3F%20Se%20potessi%20fornire%20un%20set%20di%20dati%2C%20sarebbe%20utile.%3C%2FP%3E%20%0A%20%20%20%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20%0A%20%20%20%3CP%3EGrazie%2C%3C%2FP%3E%20%0A%20%20%20%3CP%3EBen%3C%2FP%3E%0A%20%20%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
RafaelZS
Level I

Multicolliniarity issue in a Cox Proportional Hazard Model

Hi Everybody,

 

I need help to understand and address the following issue.

 

I'm building a model to predict the development of cardiovascular disease in a cohort. I’ve included two variables that are correlated with each other (R² = 0.83). When I include both in the model, one of them flips direction—it becomes protective instead of a risk factor. But when I include each variable separately, both show a positive association with disease, as expected.

 

I don't think this is due to a biological explanation—it seems more like a multicollinearity issue. I know I could use either VIF or PCA to address this. But since my outcome is binary, I’m unsure how to correctly calculate VIF. I tried running a least squares regression between the two variables and got a VIF of 1, but I don’t think that’s the right approach here.

 

Has anyone dealt with a similar situation? How would you recommend addressing this?

RZ
1 REPLY 1

Re: Multicolliniarity issue in a Cox Proportional Hazard Model

Hi @RafaelZS ,

 

Have you considered simply placing an interaction term (X1*X2) in the model to see the effect on the model outcomes and the VIF values? If you could provide a dataset that would be helpful.

 

Thanks,

Ben

“All models are wrong, but some are useful”

Recommended Articles