cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • New to JMP? Join us Sept. 23-24 for the Early User Edition of Discovery Summit, tailor-made for new users. Register now for free!
  • Use World Cup data to build models, explore spatial relationships, and create informative visualizations in JMP. Register. July 17, 2 pm US Eastern Time.
  • Your voice matters! Tell us how you prefer to receive JMP updates, so we can tailor our communication to your needs. Take short survey.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
RafaelZS
Level I

Multicolliniarity issue in a Cox Proportional Hazard Model

Hi Everybody,

 

I need help to understand and address the following issue.

 

I'm building a model to predict the development of cardiovascular disease in a cohort. I’ve included two variables that are correlated with each other (R² = 0.83). When I include both in the model, one of them flips direction—it becomes protective instead of a risk factor. But when I include each variable separately, both show a positive association with disease, as expected.

 

I don't think this is due to a biological explanation—it seems more like a multicollinearity issue. I know I could use either VIF or PCA to address this. But since my outcome is binary, I’m unsure how to correctly calculate VIF. I tried running a least squares regression between the two variables and got a VIF of 1, but I don’t think that’s the right approach here.

 

Has anyone dealt with a similar situation? How would you recommend addressing this?

RZ
1 REPLY 1

Re: Multicolliniarity issue in a Cox Proportional Hazard Model

Hi @RafaelZS ,

 

Have you considered simply placing an interaction term (X1*X2) in the model to see the effect on the model outcomes and the VIF values? If you could provide a dataset that would be helpful.

 

Thanks,

Ben

“All models are wrong, but some are useful”

Recommended Articles