cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
The Discovery Summit 2025 Call for Content is open! Submit an abstract today to present at our premier analytics conference.
See how to use JMP Live to centralize and share reports within groups. Webinar with Q&A April 4, 2pm ET.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
View Original Published Thread

Mahalanobis distance in JMP differs from other methods

AT
AT
Level V

Hi,

I am comparing Mahalanobis distance calculated by JMP vs. one reported in other tables using their software. The JMP reports for MD 2.35 +/- .54 vs. 1.23 +/- 0.68 . I was wondering if there is anything special about JMP. I have 30 data points with 6 variables.

 

I appreciate any comments. Thanks

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
txnelson
Super User


Re: Mahalanobis distance in JMP differs from other methods

Here is the calculation used in JMP for Mahalanobis, taken from 

     Help==>Books==>Multivariate Methods

Is it different from your undefined product?

nahalanobis.PNG

Jim

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3
txnelson
Super User


Re: Mahalanobis distance in JMP differs from other methods

Here is the calculation used in JMP for Mahalanobis, taken from 

     Help==>Books==>Multivariate Methods

Is it different from your undefined product?

nahalanobis.PNG

Jim
AT
AT
Level V


Re: Mahalanobis distance in JMP differs from other methods

Thanks Jim for the reply and definition of MD in JMP. The one I like to use is Mahalanobis distance defined in Mahalanobis Taguchi System (MTS). I have attached the definition in the attached file. It looks like there are differences. 

 

Anyone has used MTS method in JMP? ThanksMD in MTS.png

 

 

 
 
David_Burnham
Super User (Alumni)


Re: Mahalanobis distance in JMP differs from other methods

More dodgy maths from Genichi Taguchi?

-Dave