cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Submit your abstract to the call for content for Discovery Summit Americas by April 23. Selected abstracts will be presented at Discovery Summit, Oct. 21- 24.
Discovery is online this week, April 16 and 18. Join us for these exciting interactive sessions.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
AT
AT
Level V

Mahalanobis distance in JMP differs from other methods

Hi,

I am comparing Mahalanobis distance calculated by JMP vs. one reported in other tables using their software. The JMP reports for MD 2.35 +/- .54 vs. 1.23 +/- 0.68 . I was wondering if there is anything special about JMP. I have 30 data points with 6 variables.

 

I appreciate any comments. Thanks

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
txnelson
Super User

Re: Mahalanobis distance in JMP differs from other methods

Here is the calculation used in JMP for Mahalanobis, taken from 

     Help==>Books==>Multivariate Methods

Is it different from your undefined product?

nahalanobis.PNG

Jim

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3
txnelson
Super User

Re: Mahalanobis distance in JMP differs from other methods

Here is the calculation used in JMP for Mahalanobis, taken from 

     Help==>Books==>Multivariate Methods

Is it different from your undefined product?

nahalanobis.PNG

Jim
AT
AT
Level V

Re: Mahalanobis distance in JMP differs from other methods

Thanks Jim for the reply and definition of MD in JMP. The one I like to use is Mahalanobis distance defined in Mahalanobis Taguchi System (MTS). I have attached the definition in the attached file. It looks like there are differences. 

 

Anyone has used MTS method in JMP? ThanksMD in MTS.png

 

 

 
 
David_Burnham
Super User (Alumni)

Re: Mahalanobis distance in JMP differs from other methods

More dodgy maths from Genichi Taguchi?

-Dave