User Community
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Learn how to build custom Python data connectors and further customize JMP’s Data Connector Framework with the Python Data Connector Demo, available now in the JMP Marketplace!
  • See how to create experiments to support product design and ID useful product features. Register for June 12 webinar, 2pm US Eastern Time.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
ElenaB
ElenaB
Level I

Interpretation of JMP GR&R result table in JMP 15.1.0

Created: Oct 23, 2020 08:46 PM  |  Last Modified: Jun 10, 2023 4:21 PM (4052 views)

Hi Community of Experienced Users!

I am a new to JMP and  trying to interpret the Gauge R&R results.

When I look at the Result table: could you explain why Reproducibility is 60.54 %, if the formula for calculation is V(total)- V(Assay) -V(Within)? When I apply this formula, I am getting: 63.63 (Total)-3.61 (Assay) - 19.26 ( Within) =40.76.

Could you please help? The second question is what is categorized into "equipment variation"? Thank you!

ElenaB_0-1603499825712.png

 

0 Kudos
2 REPLIES 2
Mark_Bailey
Staff Mark_Bailey
Staff

Re: Interpretation of JMP GR&R result table in JMP 15.1.0

Oct 24, 2020 03:09 PM (4016 views)  |  Posted in reply to message from ElenaB 10-23-2020

Did you check the help for Gage R&R yet?

shampton82
shampton82
Level VII

Re: Interpretation of JMP GR&R result table in JMP 15.1.0

Oct 24, 2020 08:37 PM (4004 views)  |  Posted in reply to message from ElenaB 10-23-2020
It is because the Stdev’s don’t add up to 100%. If you want to look at the % of variation from each component in a way that’s adds up to 100% use the variance component table at the bottom of the output or click on the variance output table for more detailed breakout.

Steve
0 Kudos

Recommended Articles