cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Submit your abstract to the call for content for Discovery Summit Americas by April 23. Selected abstracts will be presented at Discovery Summit, Oct. 21- 24.
Discovery is online this week, April 16 and 18. Join us for these exciting interactive sessions.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
ih
Super User (Alumni) ih
Super User (Alumni)

How are Gamma-Poisson Distribution Fit Parameters Determined? They differ from a least-squares solution.

The distribution platform estimates lambda and sigma parameters for a Gamma-Poisson distribution of the attached data to be 10.0 and 4.4.  A separate least-squares method finds 7.5 and 2.1.  I am not proposing the orange line to be better than the gray (JMP) only that it fits my current needs better.  For other data sets the parameters found by both systems are fairly close.

Does anyone have an idea as to what is happening here?

12993_pastedImage_3.png

12994_pastedImage_4.png

Sum of error squared

JMP: 0.014

Solver: 0.0086

Thanks,

Isaac

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
maurogerber
Level III

Re: How are Gamma-Poisson Distribution Fit Parameters Determined? They differ from a least-squares

normaly with MLE (maximum likelihood estimation)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_likelihood_estimation

the -2log(Likelihood) in your picture is a good hint that it's probably used.

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
maurogerber
Level III

Re: How are Gamma-Poisson Distribution Fit Parameters Determined? They differ from a least-squares

normaly with MLE (maximum likelihood estimation)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_likelihood_estimation

the -2log(Likelihood) in your picture is a good hint that it's probably used.

ih
Super User (Alumni) ih
Super User (Alumni)

Re: How are Gamma-Poisson Distribution Fit Parameters Determined? They differ from a least-squares

Thank you maurogerber.

I figured this out shortly after posting the question but then couldn't edit the question as the site was down. :-(