User Community
cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Sign-in to the JMP Community will be unavailable intermittently Dec. 6-7 due to a system update. Thank you for your understanding!
  • We’re retiring the File Exchange at the end of this year. The JMP Marketplace is now your destination for add-ins and extensions.
  • JMP 19 is here! Learn more about the new features.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
Rily_Maya
Rily_Maya
Level III

A question regarding reliability growth in concurrent systems

Jun 5, 2025 09:53 AM (1097 views)

May I ask:

Why do the results in Table VI on page 83 of MIL-HDBK-189C, "Department of Defense Handbook Reliability Growth Management", differ from the results analyzed by JMP?

Concurrent Systems.jmp
0 Kudos
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
peng_liu
peng_liu
Level VII
Solution

Re: A question regarding reliability growth in concurrent systems

Created: Jun 6, 2025 09:58 PM  |  Last Modified: Jun 6, 2025 6:59 PM (1012 views)  |  Posted in reply to message from Rily_Maya 06-05-2025

Why F = 45? Should it be 27?

I believe that we debated it during development. And concluded the handbook is wrong.

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3
Rily_Maya
Rily_Maya
Level III

Re: A question regarding reliability growth in concurrent systems

Jun 5, 2025 08:00 PM (1057 views)  |  Posted in reply to message from Rily_Maya 06-05-2025
 
130 KB
0 Kudos
Rily_Maya
Rily_Maya
Level III

Re: A question regarding reliability growth in concurrent systems

Jun 5, 2025 08:06 PM (1054 views)  |  Posted in reply to message from Rily_Maya 06-05-2025

TABLE VI.png

0 Kudos
peng_liu
peng_liu
Level VII
Solution

Re: A question regarding reliability growth in concurrent systems

Created: Jun 6, 2025 09:58 PM  |  Last Modified: Jun 6, 2025 6:59 PM (1013 views)  |  Posted in reply to message from Rily_Maya 06-05-2025

Why F = 45? Should it be 27?

I believe that we debated it during development. And concluded the handbook is wrong.

Recommended Articles