cancel
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Register to attend Discovery Summit 2025 Online: Early Users Edition, Sept. 24-25.
  • New JMP features coming to desktops everywhere this September. Sign up to learn more at jmp.com/launch.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
Rily_Maya
Rily_Maya
Level II

A question regarding reliability growth in concurrent systems

Jun 5, 2025 09:53 AM (529 views)

May I ask:

Why do the results in Table VI on page 83 of MIL-HDBK-189C, "Department of Defense Handbook Reliability Growth Management", differ from the results analyzed by JMP?

Concurrent Systems.jmp
0 Kudos
1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
peng_liu
Staff peng_liu
Staff
Solution

Re: A question regarding reliability growth in concurrent systems

Created: Jun 6, 2025 09:58 PM  |  Last Modified: Jun 6, 2025 6:59 PM (444 views)  |  Posted in reply to message from Rily_Maya 06-05-2025

Why F = 45? Should it be 27?

I believe that we debated it during development. And concluded the handbook is wrong.

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3
Rily_Maya
Rily_Maya
Level II

Re: A question regarding reliability growth in concurrent systems

Jun 5, 2025 08:00 PM (489 views)  |  Posted in reply to message from Rily_Maya 06-05-2025
 
130 KB
0 Kudos
Rily_Maya
Rily_Maya
Level II

Re: A question regarding reliability growth in concurrent systems

Jun 5, 2025 08:06 PM (486 views)  |  Posted in reply to message from Rily_Maya 06-05-2025

TABLE VI.png

0 Kudos
peng_liu
Staff peng_liu
Staff
Solution

Re: A question regarding reliability growth in concurrent systems

Created: Jun 6, 2025 09:58 PM  |  Last Modified: Jun 6, 2025 6:59 PM (445 views)  |  Posted in reply to message from Rily_Maya 06-05-2025

Why F = 45? Should it be 27?

I believe that we debated it during development. And concluded the handbook is wrong.

Recommended Articles