JMP User Community

Latest Discussions

LearnBot not working?

Hi, I downloaded LearnBot v1.1 and managed to run it on JMP Pro 19.0.1 but there is no response generated. Has anybody ran into this error and solve it?
Xu_Yong

Discussions |
May 14, 2026 1:50 PM

207 views | 2 replies
Hierarchical clustering platform color map columns

I have a hierarchical cluster with ~ 2700 Y -rows and 100 columns of data. When complete I want to color map the clusters to two other columns in the data. I can do so but then the questions start. 1. One color map is to identify the rows of data by a type (in this case a tissue type). That accurately displays as a color for each tissue but, how do I attach a legend to the visualization for t...
MKostura

Discussions |
May 14, 2026 5:36 AM

239 views | 2 replies
"Replace missing with previous value" for multiple column selection on JMP19

Previous versions of JMP would let users select multiple columns and use the "Replace missing with previous value" option from the right-click drop-down menu, applying the function to all columns selected. With JMP19, I can only do it if I select one column at a time. Is there a way to keep doing with with multiple columns selected?
AcceptanceOwl96

Discussions |
May 13, 2026 9:59 AM

124 views | 0 replies
oci question

Hello, I am looking for an example of how to connect to oracle data with JMP 16 via oci. I have seen notes indicating that it is a far faster connection.
Rejigger

Discussions |
May 13, 2026 8:18 AM

110 views | 1 replies
line connecting through points of different groups only allowing me to plot the mean (or some other statistic) of variables

I am having trouble connecting a line through points of different groups. I have my data coloured according to the depth interval each sample was taken at. Previously (about a year ago) I would just right click on the graph, go to 'add' then 'line' and would achieve the result I wanted, but I have since updated JMP and it is no longer working this way. I am only able to plot the mean, min, median,...
peck

Discussions |
May 13, 2026 7:16 AM

158 views | 2 replies

Previous
Next

Latest Discussions

LearnBot not working?

Hi, I downloaded LearnBot v1.1 and managed to run it on JMP Pro 19.0.1 but there is no response generated. Has anybody ran into this error and solve it?
Xu_Yong

Discussions |
May 14, 2026 1:50 PM

207 views | 2 replies
Hierarchical clustering platform color map columns

I have a hierarchical cluster with ~ 2700 Y -rows and 100 columns of data. When complete I want to color map the clusters to two other columns in the data. I can do so but then the questions start. 1. One color map is to identify the rows of data by a type (in this case a tissue type). That accurately displays as a color for each tissue but, how do I attach a legend to the visualization for t...
MKostura

Discussions |
May 14, 2026 5:36 AM

239 views | 2 replies
"Replace missing with previous value" for multiple column selection on JMP19

Previous versions of JMP would let users select multiple columns and use the "Replace missing with previous value" option from the right-click drop-down menu, applying the function to all columns selected. With JMP19, I can only do it if I select one column at a time. Is there a way to keep doing with with multiple columns selected?
AcceptanceOwl96

Discussions |
May 13, 2026 9:59 AM

124 views | 0 replies
oci question

Hello, I am looking for an example of how to connect to oracle data with JMP 16 via oci. I have seen notes indicating that it is a far faster connection.
Rejigger

Discussions |
May 13, 2026 8:18 AM

110 views | 1 replies
Lack of fit test

Hello everyone. I have a question related to DOE.
When conducting a Lack of fit test, how should the F ratio be calculated? F=MS residual /MS pure eror or F=MS lack of fit/MS pure eror. The idea is to compare the model error with the experimental error.. Are the results obtained from the two formulas different? Which result is more reliable and when is it necessary to use each of the two formula...
DiscreteIbex427

Discussions |
May 11, 2026 8:09 AM

309 views | 3 replies

Previous
Next

Latest Discussions

"Replace missing with previous value" for multiple column selection on JMP19

Previous versions of JMP would let users select multiple columns and use the "Replace missing with previous value" option from the right-click drop-down menu, applying the function to all columns selected. With JMP19, I can only do it if I select one column at a time. Is there a way to keep doing with with multiple columns selected?
AcceptanceOwl96

Discussions |
May 13, 2026 9:59 AM

124 views | 0 replies
How to Look at Range Data High Medium Low

Looking for the Best way to analysis Data when I have Ranges Upper, Mid and Lower for both Voltage and Freq. data. See RED Columns. Guess I could perform a Control Chart or Dist. but like to to see if their is a shift of this many Electrical Devices. Any Suggestions?
CREV

Discussions |
May 8, 2026 2:34 PM

174 views | 0 replies
Inquiry regarding the procedure for PLS Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA)

[Environment] Version: JMP(r) Student Edition 19.1.0 (914688) License: For Academic Use Only (Expires: 2027/04/13) OS: Microsoft Windows 11 Home (10.0.26200.0)
[Inquiry] Regarding the procedure for performing PLS Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA)
I am attempting to perform a PLS Discriminant Analysis (PLS-DA) using JMP Student Edition, as I understand this feature is supported in this edition. I ...
SignBurro204

Discussions |
Apr 24, 2026 3:30 AM

232 views | 0 replies
defining function scope changes how result is returned

Why don't all three of these return their unevaluated argument like the first one does? Is there a way to make the last two work like the first? Inside the function, e is still unevaluated, this seems to happen when the result is returned. names default to here(1); ns = New Namespace("n"); foo = function({e}, Name Expr(e) ); ns:bar = function({e}, Name Expr(e) ); show( foo( expr( notavar...
ih

Discussions |
Apr 20, 2026 1:45 PM

200 views | 0 replies
How does JMP bias the rate of count when calculating the probability of Partition platform with categorical responses?

For categorical responses Partition has the response rates that are slightly biased away from zero to avoid having attributed probabilities of zero. I would like to know how to calcurate the biased probabilities.
Takashi

Discussions |
Apr 16, 2026 8:41 PM

206 views | 0 replies