What inspired this wish list request?
More intelligible table names when the option "Subset by" is used. Consecutive numerical naming, along with the deletion of the Subset by column creates datasets that have had data deleted and can be difficult to name properly.
What is the improvement you would like to see?
An option to append the data that has been appended into the subset name.
For example: If I have a data table that includes a column :Fruit of fruit names and I want to create a subset for each fruit (given the output name of "Fruit"), right now I'd use --> subset > Subset by :Fruit. This would output data tables that have the name "Fruit 1", "Fruit 2", etc. The data of which fruit each data table has been created for has been lost, since the column with this information has been deleted in this process. I'm suggesting the following:
If I have a data table that includes a column :Fruit of fruit names and I want to create a subset for each fruit (given the output name of "Fruit"), right now I'd use --> subset > Subset by :Fruit. This would output data tables that have the name "Fruit Apple", "Fruit Orange", etc.
Why is this idea important?
This would help keep information, rather than deleting it, creating predictable output tables names for calling later in scripting for further processing.