cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-374029%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3ECaracter%C3%ADsticas%20estad%C3%ADsticas%20faltantes%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-374029%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3E%3CP%3EFaltan%20ciertas%20cosas%20muy%20simplistas%20en%20la%20plataforma%20JMp%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E(1)%20JMP%20no%20puede%20realizar%20comparaciones%20de%20puntajes%20de%20propensi%C3%B3n%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E(2)%20JMP%20no%20calcula%20la%20V%20de%20Cramer%20ni%20la%20D%20de%20Cohan%20para%20calcular%20el%20tama%C3%B1o%20del%20efecto%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E(3)%20JMP%20no%20puede%20realizar%20imputaciones%20m%C3%BAltiples%20para%20variables%20categ%C3%B3ricas%20(solo%20falta%20la%20opci%C3%B3n%20informativa)%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E(4)%20JMP%20no%20permite%20efectos%20aleatorios%20en%20modelos%20de%20regresi%C3%B3n%20log%C3%ADstica%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EPuede%20que%20me%20equivoque%20en%20algunos%20de%20estos.%20Pero%20he%20hecho%20esta%20pregunta%20en%20los%20foros%20de%20discusi%C3%B3n%20y%2C%20hasta%20donde%20puedo%20decir%2C%20son%20precisas.%20Algunos%20de%20estos%20son%20un%20verdadero%20fastidio.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-374029%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3ECombinaci%C3%B3n%20y%20limpieza%20de%20datos%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-374132%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20caracter%C3%ADsticas%20estad%C3%ADsticas%20faltantes%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-374132%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EHola%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E1-%20ir%20a%20analizar%26gt%3B%20ajustar%20y%20por%20x%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E2-%20instale%20este%20complemento%3A%20Calcule%20el%20tama%C3%B1o%20de%20los%20efectos%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2FJMP-Add-Ins%2FCalculate-Effect-Sizes-Add-in%2Fta-p%2F22642%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3EComplemento%20Calcular%20tama%C3%B1os%20de%20efectos%20-%20Comunidad%20de%20usuarios%20de%20JMP%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E3-%20ir%20a%20analizar%26gt%3B%20investigaci%C3%B3n%20de%20consumidores%26gt%3B%20categ%C3%B3rico%20(todo%20lo%20existente%20y%20m%C3%A1s%20en%20la%20ventana%20de%20salida)%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E4-%3CSPAN%3E%20Este%20enlace%20responder%C3%A1%20todas%20las%20preguntas%20sobre%20el%20punto%204%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2FTutorials%2FSpecifying-and-Fitting-Models%2Fta-p%2F311072%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3EEspecificaci%C3%B3n%20y%20ajuste%20de%20modelos%20-%20Comunidad%20de%20usuarios%20de%20JMP%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%23%20Pulse%20(aceptar%20como%20soluci%C3%B3n)%20despu%C3%A9s%20de%20comprobar%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar

Missing statistical features

Certain very simplistic things are missing in the JMp platform

(1) JMP cannot do propensity score matching

(2) JMP does not calculate Cramer's V or Cohan's D for effect size calculation

(3) JMP cannot do multiple imputation for categorical variables (only does informative missing option)

(4) JMP does not allow random effects in logistic regression models

I may be mistaken in some of these. But I have asked this question in the discussion forums and as far as I can tell are accurate. Some of these are real bummer's

1 Comment
Raaed
Level IV

Hi

 

1- go to analyze > fit y by x

2- install this Add-in: Calculate Effect Sizes

Calculate Effect Sizes Add-in - JMP User Community

3- go to analyze > consumer research > categorical (everything existing and more in output window)

4- This link will answer all questions regarding Point 4

Specifying and Fitting Models - JMP User Community

 

# Hit (accept as solution) after checking