cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • Don’t miss your chance to experience Discovery Summit Europe at our best available rate! Early bird registration through 31 Oct.
  • Graph Builder Toolbar streamlines interactive graphing. Creates shortcuts on Report and GraphBuilder Helpers toolbars. Download and install the extension.
  • JMP will suspend normal business operations for our Rest and Recharge Day on Friday, October 2, 2026.
    Regular business hours will resume on Monday, October 5, 2026.

JMP Wish List

We want to hear your ideas for improving JMP. Share them here.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar

K fold use options

What inspired this wish list request? I don't use K fold validation as much as I feel I could due to the fact that it returns the best fitting fold, so I feel the model is showing better than I will see in "production".

 

 

What is the improvement you would like to see?

I would like to be able to have options on which fold to report such as best, worse, average/median, or even all (though this could be a dangerous option for large K folds)

 

 

Why is this idea important? K fold validation is a powerful tool available for both std and pro users but can be overly optimistic with the current options.

 

 

3 Comments
SarahGilyard
Staff
Status changed to: Acknowledged

Thanks for posting shampton82. Can you provide a bit more detail about your request? Is there a specific type of model/modeling platform you want this to be applicable to? 

shampton82
Level VII

Hey @SarahGilyard !

Yeah no problem.  

 

Here is an example for Neural, using Model screening I can see the fold but not in the actual platform.  

shampton82_0-1745879470021.png

 

This would be a great help for JMP Standard users (in Neural) and offer more flexibility for Pro users who want to be able to use the expanded feature set in the native platform.  

I would like to see this for Neural, Bootstrap and Boosted forests, and SVM.

 

Hope this helps!

 

Steve

 

SarahGilyard
Staff

Thanks Steve for that clarification. Request is understood and I have captured it for some internal discussion.