cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-780795%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3EOttimizzazione%20dei%20parametri%20ipertestuali%20del%20modello%20integrato%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-780795%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3E%3CSTRONG%3EGrazie%20a%20Russ%20Wolfinger%20e%20ai%20Super-utenti%20JMP%20come%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F12549%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40SDF1%3C%2FA%3E%20%2C%20ora%20ci%20sono%20componenti%20aggiuntivi%20che%20consentono%20una%20facile%20messa%20a%20punto%20degli%20iperparametri%20per%20XGBoost%2C%20reti%20neurali%2C%20foreste%20bootstrap%20e%20altri%2C%20ma%20mi%20piacerebbe%20davvero%20vederli%20integrati%20in%20JMP.%20Una%20cosa%20che%20vorrei%20fare%20%C3%A8%20testare%20migliaia%20di%20reti%20neurali%20con%20pi%C3%B9%20Y%2C%20cosa%20che%20non%20pu%C3%B2%20ancora%20essere%20fatta%20con%20il%20componente%20aggiuntivo%20(e%20non%20%C3%A8%20possibile%20per%20niente%20per%20XGBoost%2C%20per%20quanto%20ne%20so).%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSTRONG%3EA%20volte%2C%20dobbiamo%20prevedere%20pi%C3%B9%20di%20una%20cosa.%20Ad%20esempio%2C%20potresti%20voler%20ottimizzare%20un%20processo%20riducendo%20al%20minimo%20i%20costi.%20Con%20diverse%20piattaforme%20di%20modellazione%20JMP%2C%20puoi%20creare%20un%20modello%20a%20due%20Y%2C%20quindi%20utilizzare%20l'analisi%20di%20desiderabilit%C3%A0%20sotto%20il%20profiler%20per%20farlo%2C%20ma%20non%20puoi%20creare%20migliaia%20di%20modelli%20a%20due%20Y%20utilizzando%20reti%20neurali%2C%20foreste%20bootstrap%20o%20persino%20minimi%20quadrati%20standard.%20Penso%20che%20questo%20aumenterebbe%20davvero%20la%20capacit%C3%A0%20di%20JMP%20Pro%20di%20fare%20una%20modellazione%20predittiva%20hardcore.%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-780795%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EModellazione%20statistica%20avanzata%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EModellazione%20predittiva%20e%20apprendimento%20automatico%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-799573%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3ERe%3A%20Ottimizzazione%20dei%20parametri%20ipertestuali%20del%20modello%20incorporato%20-%20Stato%20modificato%20in%3A%20Riconosciuto%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-799573%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3ECiao%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F12111%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40abmayfield%3C%2FA%3E%20%2C%20grazie%20per%20aver%20inviato%20questa%20richiesta%2C%20%C3%A8%20stata%20catturata%20nel%20nostro%20sistema.%20Hai%20ragione%2C%20Russ%20e%20il%20team%20hanno%20fatto%20un%20ottimo%20lavoro%20con%20questo%20in%20XGBoost%20e%20Torch!%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ESe%20non%20l'hai%20ancora%20visto%2C%20questo%20componente%20aggiuntivo%20potrebbe%20aiutarti%3A%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2FJMP-Add-Ins%2FNeural-Network-Tuning%2Fta-p%2F662666%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2FJMP-Add-Ins%2FNeural-Network-Tuning%2Fta-p%2F662666%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar

Built-in model hyperparameter tuning

Thanks to Russ Wolfinger and JMP Super-Users like @SDF1, there are now add-ins that allow easy tuning of hyperparameters for XGBoost, neural nets, bootstrap forests, and others, but I would really like to see these integrated into JMP. One thing I would like to do is test out thousands of neural networks with multiple Y's, which cannot yet be done with the add-in (and is not possible at all for XGBoost, as far as I can tell). 

 

 

Sometimes, we need to predict more than one thing. For instance, maybe you want to optimize a process while minimizing costs. With several JMP modeling platforms, you can create a two-Y model, then use the desirability analysis under the profiler to do this, but you cannot build thousands of dual-Y models using neural networks, bootstrap forests, or even standard least squares. I think this would really increase the capacity of JMP Pro to do some hardcore predictive modeling. 

 

 

1 Comment
mia_stephens
Staff
Status changed to: Acknowledged

Hi @abmayfield , thank you for submitting this request, it has been captured in our system. You're right that Russ and team have done a really nice job with this in XGBoost and Torch! 

If you haven't seen it, this add-in might help: https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Add-Ins/Neural-Network-Tuning/ta-p/662666