cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-780795%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3EIntegriertes%20Modell-Hyperparameter-Tuning%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-780795%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%3E%3CSTRONG%3EDank%20Russ%20Wolfinger%20und%20JMP-Superusern%20wie%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F12549%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40SDF1%3C%2FA%3E%20gibt%20es%20jetzt%20Add-Ins%2C%20mit%20denen%20sich%20Hyperparameter%20f%C3%BCr%20XGBoost%2C%20neuronale%20Netze%2C%20Bootstrap-W%C3%A4lder%20und%20andere%20problemlos%20optimieren%20lassen%2C%20aber%20ich%20w%C3%BCrde%20diese%20wirklich%20gerne%20in%20JMP%20integriert%20sehen.%20Ich%20w%C3%BCrde%20beispielsweise%20gerne%20Tausende%20neuronaler%20Netze%20mit%20mehreren%20Ys%20testen%2C%20was%20mit%20dem%20Add-In%20noch%20nicht%20m%C3%B6glich%20ist%20(und%20meines%20Wissens%20nach%20f%C3%BCr%20XGBoost%20%C3%BCberhaupt%20nicht%20m%C3%B6glich%20ist).%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSTRONG%3EManchmal%20m%C3%BCssen%20wir%20mehr%20als%20eine%20Sache%20vorhersagen.%20Vielleicht%20m%C3%B6chten%20Sie%20beispielsweise%20einen%20Prozess%20optimieren%20und%20gleichzeitig%20die%20Kosten%20minimieren.%20Mit%20mehreren%20JMP-Modellierungsplattformen%20k%C3%B6nnen%20Sie%20ein%20Zwei-Y-Modell%20erstellen%20und%20dann%20die%20Wunschanalyse%20im%20Profiler%20verwenden%2C%20um%20dies%20zu%20tun.%20Sie%20k%C3%B6nnen%20jedoch%20nicht%20Tausende%20von%20Zwei-Y-Modellen%20mithilfe%20neuronaler%20Netzwerke%2C%20Bootstrap-W%C3%A4lder%20oder%20sogar%20der%20Standardmethode%20der%20kleinsten%20Quadrate%20erstellen.%20Ich%20denke%2C%20dies%20w%C3%BCrde%20die%20Kapazit%C3%A4t%20von%20JMP%20Pro%20f%C3%BCr%20Hardcore-Pr%C3%A4diktionsmodelle%20wirklich%20erh%C3%B6hen.%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-780795%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EErweiterte%20statistische%20Modellierung%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EPr%C3%A4diktive%20Modellierung%20und%20maschinelles%20Lernen%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-799573%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3EBetreff%3A%20Integriertes%20Hyperparameter-Tuning%20des%20Modells%20%E2%80%93%20Status%20ge%C3%A4ndert%20in%3A%20Best%C3%A4tigt%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-799573%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EHallo%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F12111%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%40abmayfield%3C%2FA%3E%20%2C%20danke%20f%C3%BCr%20das%20Senden%20dieser%20Anfrage%2C%20sie%20wurde%20in%20unserem%20System%20erfasst.%20Sie%20haben%20Recht%2C%20Russ%20und%20sein%20Team%20haben%20hier%20in%20XGBoost%20und%20Torch%20wirklich%20gute%20Arbeit%20geleistet!%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EWenn%20Sie%20es%20noch%20nicht%20gesehen%20haben%2C%20k%C3%B6nnte%20dieses%20Add-In%20hilfreich%20sein%3A%20%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2FJMP-Add-Ins%2FNeural-Network-Tuning%2Fta-p%2F662666%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3Ehttps%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2FJMP-Add-Ins%2FNeural-Network-Tuning%2Fta-p%2F662666%3C%2FA%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar

Built-in model hyperparameter tuning

Thanks to Russ Wolfinger and JMP Super-Users like @SDF1, there are now add-ins that allow easy tuning of hyperparameters for XGBoost, neural nets, bootstrap forests, and others, but I would really like to see these integrated into JMP. One thing I would like to do is test out thousands of neural networks with multiple Y's, which cannot yet be done with the add-in (and is not possible at all for XGBoost, as far as I can tell). 

 

 

Sometimes, we need to predict more than one thing. For instance, maybe you want to optimize a process while minimizing costs. With several JMP modeling platforms, you can create a two-Y model, then use the desirability analysis under the profiler to do this, but you cannot build thousands of dual-Y models using neural networks, bootstrap forests, or even standard least squares. I think this would really increase the capacity of JMP Pro to do some hardcore predictive modeling. 

 

 

1 Comment
mia_stephens
Staff
Status changed to: Acknowledged

Hi @abmayfield , thank you for submitting this request, it has been captured in our system. You're right that Russ and team have done a really nice job with this in XGBoost and Torch! 

If you haven't seen it, this add-in might help: https://community.jmp.com/t5/JMP-Add-Ins/Neural-Network-Tuning/ta-p/662666