It is the most common scientific number format we use in natural sciences. You can look at all the peer-reviewed papers and see it used everywhere. Thank you so much for considering implementing it.
Hello @yevgen. We are still evaluating this request for inclusion in a future release. In the meantime, one of our developers has provided a workaround. You can do custom formats in JMP with JSL. Here is an example with GB axis:
Open("$SAMPLE_DATA/CrimeData.jmp");
Graph Builder(
Variables( X(:Year ), Y(:Population )),
Elements( Points( X, Y, Legend(6)), Smoother( X, Y, Legend(7))),
SendToReport( Dispatch({},"Population", ScaleBox,{Format("Custom",
Formula(Local({supers ="⁰¹²³⁴⁵⁶⁷⁸⁹", d, parts},
parts =Words(Format( value,"Scientific", width, dec ),"e");Substitute Into( parts[2],"+","","-","⁻");For( d =0, d <=9, d++,Substitute Into( parts[2],Char( d ),Substr( supers, d +1,1)));
parts[1]||" × 10"|| parts[2];))),Min(0),Max(39248000), Inc(5000000), Minor Ticks(0)})));
Hi @yevgen , we plan to make this available in JMP 18! You will be able to find it in Scientific and Engineering column formats and in the Axis settings.