cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Try the Materials Informatics Toolkit, which is designed to easily handle SMILES data. This and other helpful add-ins are available in the JMP® Marketplace
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-798621%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3EConception%20de%20Taguchi%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-798621%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EEst-ce%20que%20quelqu'un%20sait%20comment%20concevoir%20une%20exp%C3%A9rience%20en%20utilisant%20l'approche%20Taguchi%20avec%20les%20facteurs%20suivants%20%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ETableau%20interne%26nbsp%3B%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EX1%20%C3%A0%202%20niveaux%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Ex2%20%C3%A0%202%20niveaux%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EX3%20%C3%A0%204%20niveaux%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ETableau%20externe%26nbsp%3B%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EX4%20%C3%A0%202%20niveaux%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EX5%20%C3%A0%202%20niveaux%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EL'option%20JMP%20DoE%20ne%20g%C3%A8re%20que%20les%20facteurs%20%C3%A0%203%20niveaux%2C%20comment%20puis-je%20contourner%20ce%20probl%C3%A8me%20%3F%20existe-t-il%20une%20solution%20ou%20une%20astuce%20%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EMerci%20beaucoup%20d'avance%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-798621%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EPlan%20d'exp%C3%A9riences%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EIng%C3%A9nierie%20de%20la%20qualit%C3%A9%20et%20des%20proc%C3%A9d%C3%A9s%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-798741%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3ER%C3%A9%3A%20Conception%20de%20Taguchi%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-798741%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3E%3CP%3EJe%20suis%20juste%20curieux%20de%20savoir%20pourquoi%20vous%20voudriez%20faire%20cela%20%3F%20Je%20veux%20dire%2C%20les%20tableaux%20de%20produits%20crois%C3%A9s%20sont%20une%20id%C3%A9e%20fantastique%20pour%20une%20conception%20robuste%2C%20mais%20un%20facteur%20%C3%A0%204%20niveaux%20%3F%20Le%20facteur%20%C3%A0%204%20niveaux%20est-il%20continu%20ou%20cat%C3%A9gorique%20%3F%20Bien%20que%20je%20sache%20qu'il%20existe%20un%20certain%20nombre%20de%20tableaux%20orthogonaux%20%C3%A0%202%20niveaux%2C%20Taguchi%2C%20philosophiquement%2C%20sugg%C3%A8re%20des%20conceptions%20%C3%A0%203%20niveaux%20pour%20les%20facteurs%20de%20conception%20(il%20ne%20croit%20pas%20vraiment%20que%20les%20relations%20soient%20lin%C3%A9aires).%20De%20plus%2C%20pour%20le%20tableau%20ext%C3%A9rieur%2C%20puisque%20vous%20devrez%20avoir%204%20combinaisons%20(3%20DF)%2C%20vous%20pouvez%20tout%20aussi%20bien%20ajouter%20une%20troisi%C3%A8me%20variable%20de%20bruit%20pour%20le%203e%20DF%20puisque%20vous%20ne%20vous%20souciez%20pas%20des%20interactions%20bruit%20par%20bruit.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ED'apr%C3%A8s%20mes%20souvenirs%20(c'%C3%A9tait%20il%20y%20a%20longtemps)%2C%20Taguchi%20a%20proc%C3%A9d%C3%A9%20en%20prenant%20trois%20colonnes%20du%20tableau%20orthogonal%20(3%20DF%2C%20idem%20pour%20un%20facteur%20%C3%A0%204%20niveaux).%20Cela%20vous%20donnera%208%20combinaisons%20possibles.%20D%C3%A9finissez-les%20sur%204%20niveaux%20comme%20ceci%20%3A%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CTABLE%20border%3D%220%22%20width%3D%22131%22%20cellspacing%3D%220%22%20cellpadding%3D%220%22%3E%3CCOLGROUP%3E%3CCOL%20span%3D%224%22%20width%3D%2227%22%20%2F%3E%3CCOL%20width%3D%2223%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FCOLGROUP%3E%0A%3CTBODY%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20width%3D%2227%22%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3EA%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20width%3D%2227%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3EB%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20width%3D%2227%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3EC%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20width%3D%2227%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%20%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20width%3D%2223%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3ED%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%20%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%20%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E2%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%20%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E3%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%20%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E4%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%20%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%20%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E2%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%20%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E3%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%20%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E4%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3C%2FTBODY%3E%0A%3C%2FTABLE%3E%0A%3CP%3EN'utilisez%20pas%20les%203%20colonnes%20utilis%C3%A9es%20pour%20cr%C3%A9er%20le%20facteur%20de%20niveau%204%20(%C3%A9videmment).%20Mais%20je%20peux%20me%20tromper%20compl%C3%A8tement...%20MDR%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-805826%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3ER%C3%A9%3A%20Conception%20de%20Taguchi%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-805826%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EMerci%20beaucoup%20pour%20votre%20r%C3%A9ponse%20et%20d%C3%A9sol%C3%A9%20pour%20le%20retard%20de%20r%C3%A9ponse.%20Votre%20suggestion%20est%20simple%20et%20intelligente%2C%20merci%20!%20(pourquoi%20n'y%20ai-je%20pas%20pens%C3%A9%20moi-m%C3%AAme)%20%3CLI-EMOJI%20id%3D%22lia_winking-face%22%20title%3D%22%3Acara_gui%C3%B1ando_un_ojo%3A%22%3E%3C%2FLI-EMOJI%3E%3CLI-EMOJI%20id%3D%22lia_slightly-smiling-face%22%20title%3D%22%3Acara_con_una_leve_sonrisa%3A%22%3E%3C%2FLI-EMOJI%3E%20).%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EPour%20r%C3%A9pondre%20%C3%A0%20votre%20question%2C%20les%20quatre%20niveaux%20sont%20cat%C3%A9goriques.%20Pourquoi%20%3F%20Est-ce%20que%20cela%20fait%20une%20diff%C3%A9rence%20dans%20la%20conception%20%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-805827%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3ER%C3%A9%3A%20Conception%20de%20Taguchi%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-805827%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EDans%20les%20exp%C3%A9riences%20industrielles%2C%20la%20principale%20raison%20d'exp%C3%A9rimenter%20sur%20des%20facteurs%20%C3%A0%20plus%20de%202%20niveaux%20est%20d'ajouter%20des%20termes%20non%20lin%C3%A9aires%20au%20polyn%C3%B4me.%20Ces%20termes%20n'ont%20aucun%20sens%20pour%20les%20facteurs%20cat%C3%A9goriels.%20%C3%89tant%20donn%C3%A9%20que%20le%20facteur%20est%20cat%C3%A9goriel%2C%20essayez-vous%20de%20%C2%AB%20choisir%20un%20gagnant%20%C2%BB%20ou%20de%20comprendre%20les%20relations%20de%20cause%20%C3%A0%20effet%20%3F%20Il%20n'est%20pas%20n%C3%A9cessaire%20d'avoir%20plus%20de%202%20cat%C3%A9gories%20pour%20essayer%20de%20faire%20ce%20dernier.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
MoNa1324
Level I

Taguchi Design

Does anyone know how to design an experiment using Taguchi approach with following factors? 

Inner array:

X1 at 2 levels 

x2 at 2 levels

X3 at 4 levels 

 

Outer array: 

X4 at 2 levels

X5 at 2 levels  

 

JMP DoE option only handles factors at 3 levels, how do I get round it? is there a solution or a trick? 

Many thanks in advance 

 

 

 

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
statman
Super User

Re: Taguchi Design

Just curious why you would want to do this?  I mean, Cross product arrays are a fantastic idea for robust design, but a 4-level factor? Is the 4-level factor continuous or categorical? While I know there are a number of 2-level orthogonal arrays, Taguchi, philosophically, suggests 3-level designs for the design factors (he doesn't really believe relationships are linear).  Also for the outer array, since you will have to have 4 combinations (3 DFs) you might as well add a third noise variable for the 3rd DF since you don't care about noise-by-noise interactions.

 

To the best of my recollection (this was a long time ago), the way Taguchi did it was to take three columns from the orthogonal array (3 DFs, same for a 4-level factor). That will give you 8 possible combinations.  Set those to 4 levels like this:

A B C   D
-1 -1 -1   1
1 -1 -1   2
-1 1 -1   3
1 1 -1   4
-1 -1 1   1
1 -1 1   2
-1 1 1   3
1 1 1   4

Don't use the 3 columns used to create the 4 level factor (obviously). But I could be completely wrong...LOL

"All models are wrong, some are useful" G.E.P. Box

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3
statman
Super User

Re: Taguchi Design

Just curious why you would want to do this?  I mean, Cross product arrays are a fantastic idea for robust design, but a 4-level factor? Is the 4-level factor continuous or categorical? While I know there are a number of 2-level orthogonal arrays, Taguchi, philosophically, suggests 3-level designs for the design factors (he doesn't really believe relationships are linear).  Also for the outer array, since you will have to have 4 combinations (3 DFs) you might as well add a third noise variable for the 3rd DF since you don't care about noise-by-noise interactions.

 

To the best of my recollection (this was a long time ago), the way Taguchi did it was to take three columns from the orthogonal array (3 DFs, same for a 4-level factor). That will give you 8 possible combinations.  Set those to 4 levels like this:

A B C   D
-1 -1 -1   1
1 -1 -1   2
-1 1 -1   3
1 1 -1   4
-1 -1 1   1
1 -1 1   2
-1 1 1   3
1 1 1   4

Don't use the 3 columns used to create the 4 level factor (obviously). But I could be completely wrong...LOL

"All models are wrong, some are useful" G.E.P. Box
MoNa1324
Level I

Re: Taguchi Design

Thank you very much for your reply and sorry for the delay responding.  Your suggestion is simple and smart thank you! (why didn't I think of it myself ).

 

To answer your question, the four 4 levels are categorical. why? does it make a difference in design? 

 

statman
Super User

Re: Taguchi Design

For industrial experiments, the primary reason for experimenting on factors at more than 2 levels is to add non-linear terms to the polynomial.  These terms are non-sensical for categorical factors. Since the factor is categorical, are you trying to "pick a winner" or understand causal relationships?  No need for more than 2 categories when trying to do the latter.

"All models are wrong, some are useful" G.E.P. Box