cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Try the Materials Informatics Toolkit, which is designed to easily handle SMILES data. This and other helpful add-ins are available in the JMP® Marketplace
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-798621%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3ETaguchi%20Design%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-798621%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EDoes%20anyone%20know%20how%20to%20design%20an%20experiment%20using%20Taguchi%20approach%20with%20following%20factors%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EInner%20array%3A%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EX1%20at%202%20levels%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3Ex2%20at%202%20levels%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EX3%20at%204%20levels%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EOuter%20array%3A%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EX4%20at%202%20levels%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EX5%20at%202%20levels%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EJMP%20DoE%20option%20only%20handles%20factors%20at%203%20levels%2C%20how%20do%20I%20get%20round%20it%3F%20is%20there%20a%20solution%20or%20a%20trick%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EMany%20thanks%20in%20advance%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-798621%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EDesign%20of%20Experiments%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EQuality%20and%20Process%20Engineering%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-798741%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3ERe%3A%20Taguchi%20Design%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-798741%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3E%3CP%3EJust%20curious%20why%20you%20would%20want%20to%20do%20this%3F%20%26nbsp%3BI%20mean%2C%20Cross%20product%20arrays%20are%20a%20fantastic%20idea%20for%20robust%20design%2C%20but%20a%204-level%20factor%3F%20Is%20the%204-level%20factor%20continuous%20or%20categorical%3F%20While%20I%20know%20there%20are%20a%20number%20of%202-level%20orthogonal%20arrays%2C%20Taguchi%2C%20philosophically%2C%20suggests%203-level%20designs%20for%20the%20design%20factors%20(he%20doesn't%20really%20believe%20relationships%20are%20linear).%20%26nbsp%3BAlso%20for%20the%20outer%20array%2C%20since%20you%20will%20have%20to%20have%204%20combinations%20(3%20DFs)%20you%20might%20as%20well%20add%20a%20third%20noise%20variable%20for%20the%203rd%20DF%20since%20you%20don't%20care%20about%20noise-by-noise%20interactions.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ETo%20the%20best%20of%20my%20recollection%20(this%20was%20a%20long%20time%20ago)%2C%20the%20way%20Taguchi%20did%20it%20was%20to%20take%20three%20columns%20from%20the%20orthogonal%20array%20(3%20DFs%2C%20same%20for%20a%204-level%20factor).%20That%20will%20give%20you%208%20possible%20combinations.%20%26nbsp%3BSet%20those%20to%204%20levels%20like%20this%3A%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CTABLE%20border%3D%220%22%20width%3D%22131%22%20cellspacing%3D%220%22%20cellpadding%3D%220%22%3E%3CCOLGROUP%3E%3CCOL%20span%3D%224%22%20width%3D%2227%22%20%2F%3E%3CCOL%20width%3D%2223%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2FCOLGROUP%3E%0A%3CTBODY%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20width%3D%2227%22%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3EA%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20width%3D%2227%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3EB%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20width%3D%2227%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3EC%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20width%3D%2227%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20width%3D%2223%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3ED%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E2%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E3%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E4%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E2%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E-1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E3%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3CTR%3E%0A%3CTD%20height%3D%2224%22%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E1%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3CTD%20class%3D%22xl63%22%3E4%3C%2FTD%3E%0A%3C%2FTR%3E%0A%3C%2FTBODY%3E%0A%3C%2FTABLE%3E%0A%3CP%3EDon't%20use%20the%203%20columns%20used%20to%20create%20the%204%20level%20factor%20(obviously).%20But%20I%20could%20be%20completely%20wrong...LOL%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-805826%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3ERe%3A%20Taguchi%20Design%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-805826%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EThank%20you%20very%20much%20for%20your%20reply%20and%20sorry%20for%20the%20delay%20responding.%26nbsp%3B%20Your%20suggestion%20is%20simple%20and%20smart%20thank%20you!%20(why%20didn't%20I%20think%20of%20it%20myself%20%3CLI-EMOJI%20id%3D%22lia_winking-face%22%20title%3D%22%3Acara_gui%C3%B1ando_un_ojo%3A%22%3E%3C%2FLI-EMOJI%3E%20%3CLI-EMOJI%20id%3D%22lia_slightly-smiling-face%22%20title%3D%22%3Acara_con_una_leve_sonrisa%3A%22%3E%3C%2FLI-EMOJI%3E%20).%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ETo%20answer%20your%20question%2C%20the%20four%204%20levels%20are%20categorical.%20why%3F%20does%20it%20make%20a%20difference%20in%20design%3F%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-805827%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3ERe%3A%20Taguchi%20Design%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-805827%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22CREATE%22%3E%3CP%3EFor%20industrial%20experiments%2C%20the%20primary%20reason%20for%20experimenting%20on%20factors%20at%20more%20than%202%20levels%20is%20to%20add%20non-linear%20terms%20to%20the%20polynomial.%20%26nbsp%3BThese%20terms%20are%20non-sensical%20for%20categorical%20factors.%20Since%20the%20factor%20is%20categorical%2C%20are%20you%20trying%20to%20%22pick%20a%20winner%22%20or%20understand%20causal%20relationships%3F%20%26nbsp%3BNo%20need%20for%20more%20than%202%20categories%20when%20trying%20to%20do%20the%20latter.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
MoNa1324
Level I

Taguchi Design

Does anyone know how to design an experiment using Taguchi approach with following factors? 

Inner array:

X1 at 2 levels 

x2 at 2 levels

X3 at 4 levels 

 

Outer array: 

X4 at 2 levels

X5 at 2 levels  

 

JMP DoE option only handles factors at 3 levels, how do I get round it? is there a solution or a trick? 

Many thanks in advance 

 

 

 

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
statman
Super User

Re: Taguchi Design

Just curious why you would want to do this?  I mean, Cross product arrays are a fantastic idea for robust design, but a 4-level factor? Is the 4-level factor continuous or categorical? While I know there are a number of 2-level orthogonal arrays, Taguchi, philosophically, suggests 3-level designs for the design factors (he doesn't really believe relationships are linear).  Also for the outer array, since you will have to have 4 combinations (3 DFs) you might as well add a third noise variable for the 3rd DF since you don't care about noise-by-noise interactions.

 

To the best of my recollection (this was a long time ago), the way Taguchi did it was to take three columns from the orthogonal array (3 DFs, same for a 4-level factor). That will give you 8 possible combinations.  Set those to 4 levels like this:

A B C   D
-1 -1 -1   1
1 -1 -1   2
-1 1 -1   3
1 1 -1   4
-1 -1 1   1
1 -1 1   2
-1 1 1   3
1 1 1   4

Don't use the 3 columns used to create the 4 level factor (obviously). But I could be completely wrong...LOL

"All models are wrong, some are useful" G.E.P. Box

View solution in original post

3 REPLIES 3
statman
Super User

Re: Taguchi Design

Just curious why you would want to do this?  I mean, Cross product arrays are a fantastic idea for robust design, but a 4-level factor? Is the 4-level factor continuous or categorical? While I know there are a number of 2-level orthogonal arrays, Taguchi, philosophically, suggests 3-level designs for the design factors (he doesn't really believe relationships are linear).  Also for the outer array, since you will have to have 4 combinations (3 DFs) you might as well add a third noise variable for the 3rd DF since you don't care about noise-by-noise interactions.

 

To the best of my recollection (this was a long time ago), the way Taguchi did it was to take three columns from the orthogonal array (3 DFs, same for a 4-level factor). That will give you 8 possible combinations.  Set those to 4 levels like this:

A B C   D
-1 -1 -1   1
1 -1 -1   2
-1 1 -1   3
1 1 -1   4
-1 -1 1   1
1 -1 1   2
-1 1 1   3
1 1 1   4

Don't use the 3 columns used to create the 4 level factor (obviously). But I could be completely wrong...LOL

"All models are wrong, some are useful" G.E.P. Box
MoNa1324
Level I

Re: Taguchi Design

Thank you very much for your reply and sorry for the delay responding.  Your suggestion is simple and smart thank you! (why didn't I think of it myself ).

 

To answer your question, the four 4 levels are categorical. why? does it make a difference in design? 

 

statman
Super User

Re: Taguchi Design

For industrial experiments, the primary reason for experimenting on factors at more than 2 levels is to add non-linear terms to the polynomial.  These terms are non-sensical for categorical factors. Since the factor is categorical, are you trying to "pick a winner" or understand causal relationships?  No need for more than 2 categories when trying to do the latter.

"All models are wrong, some are useful" G.E.P. Box