turn on suggestions

Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.

Showing results for

- JMP User Community
- :
- Discussions
- :
- Discussions
- :
- Sample size and power for two sample proportions

Topic Options

- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Mark Topic as New
- Mark Topic as Read
- Float this Topic for Current User
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Printer Friendly Page

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Feb 2, 2015 10:47 PM
(2949 views)

I need to test if a change to my line will adversely affect yields but I am not sure if I am using the correct values for *Proportion 2* and the *Null Difference in Proportion* in the Sample Size and Power calculator for Two Sample Proportions.

I am expecting the process change to have no effect on yield but want to design a test that would have high power of detecting a 1% drop.

For Alpha=0.05 and Power=0.80, which of the options below is correct?

**Option A**

Proportion 1: 0.94

Proportion 2: 0.94

Null Difference in Proportion: -0.01

**Option B**

Proportion 1: 0.94

Proportion 2: 0.93

Null Difference in Proportion: 0

Regards

S

2 ACCEPTED SOLUTIONS

Accepted Solutions

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Hi swelish,

It seems as though option B is what you will want to use. Under the null hypothesis there would be no change (assuming your change to the line will have no effect on yields, the difference in the proportions will be 0). The difference between proportion 1 and 2 is what you are calculating your power to estimate -- in this case, you want high power to detect that 0.01 difference.

Option A represents a different type of test, one in which you are specifying a world in which the proportions are really the same, but under the null hypothesis one should expect that 0.01 difference. This might apply if, in the past, there has always been 0.01 difference in yields, and you want to determine power to detect that you have brought them in alignment.

I hope this helps!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

You can read more about the two-sample proportion module here: One-Sample and Two-Sample Proportions

For more details about the computations in the power and sample size module, please see this white paper on jmp.com:

http://www.jmp.com/blind/whitepapers/wp_jmp_powersample_104887.pdf

Best,

Michael

Michael Crotty

Sr Statistical Writer

JMP Development

Sr Statistical Writer

JMP Development

3 REPLIES

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Hi swelish,

It seems as though option B is what you will want to use. Under the null hypothesis there would be no change (assuming your change to the line will have no effect on yields, the difference in the proportions will be 0). The difference between proportion 1 and 2 is what you are calculating your power to estimate -- in this case, you want high power to detect that 0.01 difference.

Option A represents a different type of test, one in which you are specifying a world in which the proportions are really the same, but under the null hypothesis one should expect that 0.01 difference. This might apply if, in the past, there has always been 0.01 difference in yields, and you want to determine power to detect that you have brought them in alignment.

I hope this helps!

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

Thank you, Julian

That clarifies it for me.

Regards

Sean

- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Email to a Friend
- Report Inappropriate Content

You can read more about the two-sample proportion module here: One-Sample and Two-Sample Proportions

For more details about the computations in the power and sample size module, please see this white paper on jmp.com:

http://www.jmp.com/blind/whitepapers/wp_jmp_powersample_104887.pdf

Best,

Michael

Michael Crotty

Sr Statistical Writer

JMP Development

Sr Statistical Writer

JMP Development