Hi swelish,
It seems as though option B is what you will want to use. Under the null hypothesis there would be no change (assuming your change to the line will have no effect on yields, the difference in the proportions will be 0). The difference between proportion 1 and 2 is what you are calculating your power to estimate -- in this case, you want high power to detect that 0.01 difference.
Option A represents a different type of test, one in which you are specifying a world in which the proportions are really the same, but under the null hypothesis one should expect that 0.01 difference. This might apply if, in the past, there has always been 0.01 difference in yields, and you want to determine power to detect that you have brought them in alignment.
I hope this helps!
julian