Thank you for your help, truly appreciated.
Am I on the right track if I´m thinking that by the three interactions from your example the confounded interactions wouldn´t say anything of the particular interactions included, but if significant would say that I do have one or more significant 2-way interactions in my model? If I am on the right track, would I get different information depending on how many of the three interactions are significant?
Or can I get any other information from these confounded 2-way interactions?