cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • JMP Security Notice: CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619

    JMP promptly initiated a review of its products, services, and relevant infrastructure for exposure to CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619.

    Our assessment of JMP products has not identified exposure to these vulnerabilities. Where remediation was required within supporting environments, appropriate security updates and controls have been applied and validated.

    We have identified no evidence of successful exploitation or unauthorized access to JMP systems or customer information associated with these vulnerabilities.

    JMP continues to monitor the issue and relevant vendor guidance. No action is required by JMP customers at this time.

  • Don’t miss your chance to experience Discovery Summit Europe at our best available rate! Early bird registration through 31 Oct.
  • Graph Builder Toolbar streamlines interactive graphing. Creates shortcuts on Report and GraphBuilder Helpers toolbars. Download and install the extension.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
AdditiveRange10
Level III

Process Capability Module with grouped spec limits

I am currently on JMP16 but looking to upgrade to 18 soon.

I have read some of the discussions on the topic. Basically, if we have a dataset with multiple parts that each have their own spec limits (for the same metrics) the way to evaluate them all at the same time is using the process screening platform and an associated spec limit table. If we were to try this in the Process Capability platform even with a spec limit table we would only be able to apply one set of target, LSL and USL per each metric column. This seem an oversight since the Process Capability platform has more options for graphical representation and analysis compared to the Process Screening one.

Has this been resolved in JMP 18?
Is there any other way to go around this using scripting? I have read that otherwise one must do table splits and perform each process capability analysis per part/sample but when you have tens or hundreds of them it becomes not feasible.

Any help would be appreciated.

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
shampton82
Level VII

Re: Process Capability Module with grouped spec limits

* Response removed

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1
shampton82
Level VII

Re: Process Capability Module with grouped spec limits

* Response removed

Recommended Articles