cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-55354%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EPourcentage%20de%20distribution%20par%20rapport%20au%20pourcentage%20d'occurrence%20de%20fr%C3%A9quence%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-55354%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ESalut%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EJ'ai%20un%20graphique%20de%20distribution%20de%20jmp%20avec%20le%20nombre%20et%20le%20pourcentage%20ci-joints.%20Dans%20jmp%2C%20bien%20que%20le%20num%C3%A9ro%20de%20compte%20soit%20l%C3%A0%2C%20jmp%20le%20lit%20z%C3%A9ro.%20Par%20cons%C3%A9quent%2C%20il%20y%20a%20une%20diff%C3%A9rence%20entre%20les%20%25%20calcul%C3%A9s.%20Pourquoi%20cela%20se%20produit-il%26nbsp%3B%3F%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-center%22%20image-alt%3D%22Picture1.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20999px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Picture1.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20999px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Picture1.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20999px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F10610iD2D62B8E91D8219E%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22Picture1.png%22%20alt%3D%22Picture1.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-center%22%20image-alt%3D%22Picture2.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20883px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Picture2.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20883px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Picture2.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20883px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F10608i462C6BFA608A48FC%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22Picture2.png%22%20alt%3D%22Picture2.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-center%22%20image-alt%3D%22Picture3.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20999px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Picture3.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20999px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Picture3.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20999px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F10609i53DA2FB3BE4C3E43%2Fimage-size%2Flarge%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D999%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22Picture3.png%22%20alt%3D%22Picture3.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3Emerci%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-55588%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%26nbsp%3B%3A%26nbsp%3BPourcentage%20de%20distribution%20par%20rapport%20au%20pourcentage%20d'occurrence%20de%20fr%C3%A9quence%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-55588%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EDan%20Salut%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20Merci%20beaucoup%20pour%20l'explication%20claire.%20Tu%20as%20raison.%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20Salutations%3CBR%20%2F%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-55474%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%26nbsp%3B%3A%26nbsp%3BPourcentage%20de%20distribution%20par%20rapport%20au%20pourcentage%20d'occurrence%20de%20fr%C3%A9quence%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-55474%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EJ'ai%20d%C3%BB%20louper%20quelque%20chose.%20Dans%20votre%20document%2C%20la%20barre%20encercl%C3%A9e%20va%20de%201%2C0%20%C3%A0%201%2C1%20et%20a%20un%20total%20de%2011%26nbsp%3B%25.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EDans%20la%20derni%C3%A8re%20image%2C%20le%20graphique%20JMP%20se%20pr%C3%A9sente%20sous%20la%20forme%20d'une%20barre%20de%201%2C0%20%C3%A0%201%2C05%20avec%20une%20hauteur%20de%205%26nbsp%3B%25%20et%20d'une%20autre%20barre%20de%201%2C05%20%C3%A0%201%2C1%20avec%20une%20hauteur%20de%206%26nbsp%3B%25.%205%25%20%2B%206%25%20%3D%2011%25.%20Quant%20aux%20d%C3%A9comptes%2C%20ils%20semblent%20%C3%AAtre%205005%2B%205640%20%3D%2010645%2F98968%20%3D%2010%2C756%20%25.%20Cela%20correspond%20%C3%A0%20l'arrondi%20d%C3%A9crit%20par%20Jim.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ELa%20diff%C3%A9rence%20que%20je%20vois%20est%20que%20dans%20un%20graphique%20vous%20avez%20des%20barres%20prenant%20une%20largeur%20de%200%2C1%2C%20tandis%20que%20dans%20l'autre%20la%20largeur%20des%20barres%20est%20de%200%2C05.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-55462%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%26nbsp%3B%3A%26nbsp%3BPourcentage%20de%20distribution%20par%20rapport%20au%20pourcentage%20d'occurrence%20de%20fr%C3%A9quence%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-55462%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ESalut%20Jim%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20Merci%20pour%20votre%20r%C3%A9ponse%2C%20mais%20si%20tel%20est%20le%20cas%2C%20pourquoi%20le%20pic%20du%20graphique%20en%20pourcentage%20est%20de%207%26nbsp%3B%25%20et%20celui%20du%20nombre%20de%2011%26nbsp%3B%25%26nbsp%3B%3F%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-55356%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%26nbsp%3B%3A%26nbsp%3BPourcentage%20de%20distribution%20par%20rapport%20au%20pourcentage%20d'occurrence%20de%20fr%C3%A9quence%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-55356%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EL'%C3%A9cran%20JMP%20affiche%20uniquement%20des%20valeurs%20en%20%25%20enti%C3%A8res...%20pas%20de%20valeurs%20d%C3%A9cimales.Autrement%20dit%2C%20les%20pourcentages%20sont%20arrondis%20%C3%A0%20la%20valeur%20en%20pourcentage.Ainsi%2C%20lorsqu'une%20valeur%20en%20pourcentage%20est%20%26lt%3B%200%2C5%26nbsp%3B%25%2C%20elle%20est%20affich%C3%A9e%20%C3%A0%200%26nbsp%3B%25.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
Alma1
Level III

Percent distribution vs percent frequency occurrence

Hi,

I have distribution graph from jmp with count and percent as encloed. In jmp although the count number is there jmp reads it zero. Therefore, there is a difference between  calculated % why is this happening?

 

Picture1.png

 

Picture2.png

 

Picture3.png

 

thanks

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
txnelson
Super User

Re: Percent distribution vs percent frequency occurrence

The JMP display is showing only whole % values....no decimal values.   That is, the percents are rounded off to the percent value.  Thus, when a percent value is < .5% it is displayed as 0%.

Jim

View solution in original post

4 REPLIES 4
txnelson
Super User

Re: Percent distribution vs percent frequency occurrence

The JMP display is showing only whole % values....no decimal values.   That is, the percents are rounded off to the percent value.  Thus, when a percent value is < .5% it is displayed as 0%.

Jim
Alma1
Level III

Re: Percent distribution vs percent frequency occurrence

Hi Jim
Thanks for your reply but if this is the case why the peak for percent graph is 7% and for count 11%?

Re: Percent distribution vs percent frequency occurrence

I must be missing something. In your document, the circled bar is from 1.0 to 1.1 and has a total of 11%.

 

In the last picture, the JMP graph as a bar from 1.0 to 1.05 with a height of 5% and another bar from 1.05 to 1.1 with a height of 6%. 5% + 6% = 11%. As for the counts, they appear to be 5005+ 5640 = 10645/98968 = 10.756%. That matches with the rounding that Jim described.

 

The difference that I see is that in one graph you have bars taking a width of 0.1, while in the other the bar width is 0.05.

Dan Obermiller
Alma1
Level III

Re: Percent distribution vs percent frequency occurrence

Dan Hi

Many thanks for the clear explanation. You are right.
Regards

Recommended Articles