cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • JMP Security Notice: CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619

    JMP promptly initiated a review of its products, services, and relevant infrastructure for exposure to CVE-2026-109618 and CVE-2026-109619.

    Our assessment of JMP products has not identified exposure to these vulnerabilities. Where remediation was required within supporting environments, appropriate security updates and controls have been applied and validated.

    We have identified no evidence of successful exploitation or unauthorized access to JMP systems or customer information associated with these vulnerabilities.

    JMP continues to monitor the issue and relevant vendor guidance. No action is required by JMP customers at this time.

  • Don’t miss your chance to experience Discovery Summit Europe at our best available rate! Early bird registration through 31 Oct.
  • Graph Builder Toolbar streamlines interactive graphing. Creates shortcuts on Report and GraphBuilder Helpers toolbars. Download and install the extension.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
Vartian
Level I

Monte Carlo / Simulator from Mixed Model not showing "Random Effect" noise

I have fit a Mixed Model via the Fit Model platform in JMP Pro. When opening up the 'Prediction Profiler', and inspecting the Profiler itself, I can see the as expected predicted response and its as expected confidence interval in [], which reflects the variation due to the Random Effects I have fit. 

Vartian_1-1667589476671.png

However, when I run the 'Simulator' with equal experimental variables as above, and after adding noise to my response via the 'Random by Model', the simulated to table response has a much smaller variation which is equivalent to just the RMSE/STDEV of the model fit. It does not seem to incorporate my Random Effects variance. You can see this below in the 'simulated histogram which does not include any bins even remotely close to the [11.9, 30.2] interval. 

Vartian_2-1667589538535.png

Is there a way to have the Monte Carlo simulator incorporate the "Random Effect" variance in its predictions like it does in the visual 'Prediction Profiler' tool?

0 REPLIES 0

Recommended Articles