cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Check out the JMP® Marketplace featured Capability Explorer add-in
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
fgaochori
Level I

How do you calculate power in a retrospective cohort study?

I did a retrospective study to compare the efficacy of two different treatments for the patients with infertility problems. I got negative results. How can convince the readers that this is not an underpower study? What is the point of calculate power if the study has been completed?

2 ACCEPTED SOLUTIONS

Accepted Solutions
Thierry_S
Super User

Re: How do you calculate power in a retrospective cohort study?

Hi,

Statistical power lets you gauge the smallest detectable difference within a certain power, cohort size, and the variable standard deviation used in your analysis. Hence, you could frame a retrospective power analysis in terms of not detecting any meaningful (i.e., relevant to the clinical community) difference within a certain power envelope. Still, the failure to reject the null hypothesis is not the same as concluding that your two treatments are not different.

Practically, you can use the Design of Experiment tab to look for the Sample Size and Power menu. In your case, it appears that you are comparing two means with a defined population size. By entering these parameters, JMP will display a curve of Powers by difference to detect (i.e., the number of standard deviations between the means of the two treatments).

 

This answer is my humble attempt at providing a practical answer. Others may have more refined explanations.

 

Best,

TS

Thierry R. Sornasse

View solution in original post

MRB3855
Super User

Re: How do you calculate power in a retrospective cohort study?

Hi @fgaochori : "What is the point of calculate power if the study has been completed?". As your rhetorical question implies...the short answer is "there is little point" in doing such calculations. Yes, it can be calculated (just like you can put a golf ball down the toilet)...but should you?. No.

 

Here is a good article with good references. https://library.virginia.edu/data/articles/post-hoc-power-calculations-are-not-useful 

One of the references here:  https://www.zoology.ubc.ca/~bio501/R/readings/hoenig%20&%20heisey%202001%20am%20stat%20-%20fallacy%2...

 

View solution in original post

2 REPLIES 2
Thierry_S
Super User

Re: How do you calculate power in a retrospective cohort study?

Hi,

Statistical power lets you gauge the smallest detectable difference within a certain power, cohort size, and the variable standard deviation used in your analysis. Hence, you could frame a retrospective power analysis in terms of not detecting any meaningful (i.e., relevant to the clinical community) difference within a certain power envelope. Still, the failure to reject the null hypothesis is not the same as concluding that your two treatments are not different.

Practically, you can use the Design of Experiment tab to look for the Sample Size and Power menu. In your case, it appears that you are comparing two means with a defined population size. By entering these parameters, JMP will display a curve of Powers by difference to detect (i.e., the number of standard deviations between the means of the two treatments).

 

This answer is my humble attempt at providing a practical answer. Others may have more refined explanations.

 

Best,

TS

Thierry R. Sornasse
MRB3855
Super User

Re: How do you calculate power in a retrospective cohort study?

Hi @fgaochori : "What is the point of calculate power if the study has been completed?". As your rhetorical question implies...the short answer is "there is little point" in doing such calculations. Yes, it can be calculated (just like you can put a golf ball down the toilet)...but should you?. No.

 

Here is a good article with good references. https://library.virginia.edu/data/articles/post-hoc-power-calculations-are-not-useful 

One of the references here:  https://www.zoology.ubc.ca/~bio501/R/readings/hoenig%20&%20heisey%202001%20am%20stat%20-%20fallacy%2...