cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-339536%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3EI%20risultati%20GRR%20non%20corrispondono%20ai%20risultati%20Minitab%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-339536%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ESalve%2C%20recentemente%20ho%20ricevuto%20un%20file%20con%20i%20risultati%20del%20GRR%20da%20un%20cliente%20che%20ha%20utilizzato%20il%20software%20Minitab%20per%20calcolarlo.%20Ma%20non%20possiamo%20ottenere%20lo%20stesso%20risultato%20quando%20proviamo%20a%20utilizzare%20il%20software%20JMP14.%20Si%20prega%20di%20fornire%20i%20propri%20suggerimenti%20su%20come%20ottenere%20gli%20stessi%20risultati.%20Grazie%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-339536%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3ECondivisione%20e%20comunicazione%20dei%20risultati%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-340512%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20I%20risultati%20GRR%20non%20corrispondono%20ai%20risultati%20Minitab%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-340512%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ECIAO%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGrazie%20mille%20per%20l'aiuto.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-340209%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20I%20risultati%20GRR%20non%20corrispondono%20ai%20risultati%20Minitab%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-340209%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ECIAO%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ENon%20c'%C3%A8%20modo%20di%20%22forzare%22%20l'EMS%20all'interno%20della%20piattaforma%20Variabilit%C3%A0%20perch%C3%A9%20REML%20fornisce%20stime%20migliori%20(meno%20distorte)%20quando%20sono%20presenti%20componenti%20di%20varianza%20negativi%20che%20devono%20essere%20azzerati.Tuttavia%2C%20%C3%A8%20possibile%20eseguire%20EMS%20nella%20piattaforma%20Stima%20modello%20in%20JMP.Se%20utilizzi%20il%20seguente%20script%20con%20la%20tabella%20dati%20JMP%20puoi%20ottenere%20le%20stime%20EMS%20per%20questo%20modello%20a%20effetti%20casuali%3A%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CPRE%3E%3CCODE%20class%3D%22%20language-jsl%22%3EFit%20Model(%0A%20Y(%20%3AData%20)%2C%0A%20Effects%2C%0A%20Random%20Effects(%20%3AOP%2C%20%3APart%5B%3AOP%5D%20)%2C%0A%20NoBounds(%200%20)%2C%0A%20Personality(%20%22Standard%20Least%20Squares%22%20)%2C%0A%20Method(%20%22EMS%22%20)%2C%0A%20Emphasis(%20%22Minimal%20Report%22%20)%2C%0A%20Run(%0A%20%20%3AData%20%26lt%3B%26lt%3B%20%7BSummary%20of%20Fit(%201%20)%2C%20Analysis%20of%20Variance(%201%20)%2C%0A%20%20Parameter%20Estimates(%201%20)%2C%20Lack%20of%20Fit(%200%20)%2C%20Scaled%20Estimates(%200%20)%2C%0A%20%20Plot%20Actual%20by%20Predicted(%200%20)%2C%20Plot%20Regression(%200%20)%2C%0A%20%20Plot%20Residual%20by%20Predicted(%200%20)%2C%20Plot%20Studentized%20Residuals(%200%20)%2C%0A%20%20Plot%20Effect%20Leverage(%200%20)%2C%20Plot%20Residual%20by%20Normal%20Quantiles(%200%20)%2C%0A%20%20Box%20Cox%20Y%20Transformation(%200%20)%7D%0A%20)%0A)%3B%0A%3C%2FCODE%3E%3C%2FPRE%3E%0A%3CP%3ESi%20noti%20che%20il%20componente%20di%20varianza%20OP%20%C3%A8%20negativo%20nel%20report%20Stima%20modello%20EMS.Deve%20solo%20essere%20impostato%20su%20zero%20per%20corrispondere%20a%20Minitab.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%22laural_jmp_0-1607446383851.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22laural_jmp_0-1607446383851.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20385px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22laural_jmp_0-1607446383851.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20385px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F28775iAEEACC681A07541C%2Fimage-size%2Fmedium%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D400%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22laural_jmp_0-1607446383851.png%22%20alt%3D%22laural_jmp_0-1607446383851.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ESpero%20che%20aiuti.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ELaura%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-340207%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20I%20risultati%20GRR%20non%20corrispondono%20ai%20risultati%20Minitab%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-340207%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ECiao%20Laural%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGrazie%20per%20il%20grande%20aiuto.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EEsiste%20un%20modo%20per%20selezionare%20manualmente%20l'opzione%20EMS%20nell'impostazione%20dell'analisi%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EJ%20Kumar%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-340202%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20I%20risultati%20GRR%20non%20corrispondono%20ai%20risultati%20Minitab%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-340202%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ECiao%20Bill%20Worley%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGrazie%20mille%20per%20il%20tuo%20grande%20supporto.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EOra%20i%20risultati%20sono%20molto%20vicini%20ai%20risultati%20di%20Minitab%20ad%20eccezione%20di%20Part-to-Part%20StdDev.%20Ci%C3%B2%20potrebbe%20essere%20dovuto%20alla%20differenza%20nei%20componenti%20della%20varianza%20(REML%20ed%20EMS)%20utilizzati.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ESaluti%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-340159%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20I%20risultati%20GRR%20non%20corrispondono%20ai%20risultati%20Minitab%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-340159%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ECiao%2C%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EVolevo%20fare%20un%20breve%20commento%20sulla%20risposta%20di%20Bill%20Worley.Credo%20che%20il%20motivo%20per%20cui%20vediamo%20differenze%20tra%20JMP%20e%20Minitab%20nel%20rapporto%20GRR%20di%20Bill%20%C3%A8%20perch%C3%A9%20JMP%20stima%20i%20componenti%20della%20varianza%20utilizzando%20REML%20e%20Minitab%20utilizza%20EMS%20(quadrati%20medi%20previsti%2FANOVA).I%20risultati%20REML%20ed%20EMS%20saranno%20gli%20stessi%20se%20i%20dati%20sono%20bilanciati%20e%20non%20ci%20sono%20componenti%20di%20varianza%20negativi%20che%20devono%20essere%20azzerati%2C%20ma%20non%20%C3%A8%20questo%20il%20caso.%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ESpero%20che%20questo%20aiuti%20a%20spiegare%20un%20po'%20le%20differenze.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ELaura%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-339905%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20I%20risultati%20GRR%20non%20corrispondono%20ai%20risultati%20Minitab%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-339905%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EInnanzitutto%2C%20hai%20quello%20che%20sembra%20un%20errore%20di%20battitura%20nel%20tuo%20set%20di%20dati%20(riga%2071).%20In%20secondo%20luogo%2C%20Operatore%20e%20Parte%20vengono%20incrociati%20e%20le%20ripetizioni%20(esecuzione)%20sono%20annidate.%20Minitab%20mostra%2027%20DF%20per%20parte%20eppure%20nello%20studio%20ci%20sono%20solo%2010%20parti.%20Ci%C3%B2%20non%20%C3%A8%20corretto.%20Anche%20lo%20schema%20di%20numerazione%20nel%20set%20di%20dati%20risulta%20errato.%20Per%20la%20colonna%20Esegui%2C%20credo%20che%20questa%20sia%20ripetibilit%C3%A0%20di%20precisione%2C%20la%20numerazione%20dovrebbe%20essere%201-90%20a%20meno%20che%20non%20si%20abbiano%20alcune%20ipotesi%20su%20un%20possibile%20modello%20sistematico%20nell'ordine%20di%20misurazione%20(ogni%20misurazione%20%C3%A8%20unica).%20Credo%20che%20potresti%20far%20fare%20a%20Minitab%20uno%20studio%20incrociato.%20Ho%20allegato%20un%20file%20.doc%20con%20quell'analisi.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EDetto%20questo%2C%20a%20dire%20il%20vero%2C%20non%20l'ho%20mai%20usato%3CSTRONG%3E%20Ricerca%20e%20sviluppo%20di%20JMP%20Gage%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20(Opzione%20in%20Grafici%20di%20variabilit%C3%A0)%20(sono%20della%20vecchia%20scuola%20ed%20eseguo%20l'analisi%20utilizzando%20grafici%20di%20variabilit%C3%A0%2C%20grafici%20di%20controllo%20tradizionali%20e%20ANOVA).%20IL%3CSTRONG%3E%20Componenti%20della%20varianza%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20(L'opzione%20Componenti%20della%20varianza%20in%20Grafici%20di%20variabilit%C3%A0)%20appare%20corretta.%20La%20carta%20di%20controllo%20sembra%20corretta.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ETuttavia%2C%20quando%20ho%20provato%20il%3CSTRONG%3E%20Ricerca%20e%20sviluppo%20di%20Gage%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20opzione%3CSTRONG%3E%20%2C%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20Ho%20ottenuto%20risultati%20strani%20e%20apparentemente%20errati%20(forse%20sto%20sbagliando%20l'analisi%3F%3F%3F%20).Esaminando%20il%3CSTRONG%3E%20Componenti%20della%20varianza%20per%20R%26amp%3BR%20del%20misuratore%3C%2FSTRONG%3E%20%2C%20non%20%C3%A8%20possibile%20che%20la%20riproducibilit%C3%A0%20sia%20del%2099%2C33%25.%20Sembra%20etichettato%20erroneamente%20(lo%20segnalerei%20al%20supporto%20tecnico%20JMP).%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHo%20allegato%20un%20diario%20(e%20la%20tabella%20dei%20dati%20JMP)%20in%20cui%20ho%20eseguito%20per%20la%20prima%20volta%20l'analisi%20come%20studio%20nidificato%20(il%20che%20non%20%C3%A8%20corretto).%20Quindi%20ho%20ripetuto%20lo%20studio%20come%20studio%20nidificato%20incrociato.%20I%20componenti%20della%20varianza%20sembrano%20corretti.%20Le%20opzioni%20R%26amp%3BR%20di%20Gage%20sembrano%20sbagliate%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-339853%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20I%20risultati%20GRR%20non%20corrispondono%20ai%20risultati%20Minitab%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-339853%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ECIAO%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F22428%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%20%40JKumar%3C%2FA%3E%20%2C%3CBR%20%2F%3E%20Ho%20eseguito%20GR%26amp%3BR%20sul%20tuo%20set%20di%20dati%20e%20uno%20dei%20tuoi%20punti%20dati%20(71)%20aveva%20un%20valore%20estremamente%20alto.%20Escludendo%20quel%20punto%2C%20i%20risultati%20del%20JMP%20erano%20pi%C3%B9%20vicini%20ai%20risultati%20del%20Minitab%2C%20ma%20non%20corrispondevano.%20Ho%20reinserito%20il%20punto%20dati%20con%20un%20punto%20decimale%20dove%20pensavo%20dovesse%20essere.%20I%20risultati%20erano%20pi%C3%B9%20vicini%2C%20ma%20comunque%20diversi.Ho%20quindi%20eseguito%20nuovamente%20l'analisi%2C%20ma%20questa%20volta%20sono%20andato%20alle%20Impostazioni%20di%20analisi%20e%20ho%20scelto%20l'analisi%20migliore%20(EMS%20o%20REML)%20e%20questi%20risultati%20si%20sono%20avvicinati%20molto%20ai%20risultati%20di%20Minitab.Si%20prega%20di%20vedere%20l'immagine%20qui%20sotto.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-left%22%20image-alt%3D%22Screenshot%202020-12-07%20103138.jpg%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Screenshot%202020-12-07%20103138.jpg%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22Screenshot%202020-12-07%20103138.jpg%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F28758i49A3C8E31F1F4A1D%2Fimage-size%2Fmedium%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D400%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22Screenshot%202020-12-07%20103138.jpg%22%20alt%3D%22Screenshot%202020-12-07%20103138.jpg%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ESulla%20base%20di%20questi%20risultati%20direi%20che%20la%20differenza%20nei%20risultati%20risiede%20da%20qualche%20parte%20nella%20differenza%20nei%20metodi%2Falgoritmi%20utilizzati%20in%20JMP%20e%20Minitab%20e%20forse%20nelle%20differenze%20nei%20dati%20utilizzati%20per%20ciascuna%20analisi.%26nbsp%3B%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3ERiprovare%20l'analisi%20modificando%20le%20Impostazioni%20di%20analisi%20in%20Opzioni%20nella%20Piattaforma%20di%20analisi%20del%20sistema%20di%20misurazione%20e%20ricontrollare%20che%20i%20dati%20corrispondano%20esattamente%20sia%20per%20Minitab%20che%20per%20JMP.%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EHTH%3C%2FP%3E%0A%3CP%3EConto%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-339805%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20I%20risultati%20GRR%20non%20corrispondono%20ai%20risultati%20Minitab%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-339805%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ECIAO%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGrazie%20mille%20per%20il%20tuo%20feedback%20e%20il%20grande%20aiuto.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHo%20allegato%20i%20dati%20grezzi%20e%20i%20risultati%20del%20Minitab%20come%20riferimento.%20Minitab%20utilizza%20il%20modello%20Nested.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-339803%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20I%20risultati%20GRR%20non%20corrispondono%20ai%20risultati%20Minitab%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-339803%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3ECiao%20Bartell%2C%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EGrazie%20mille%20per%20il%20tuo%20feedback%20e%20il%20grande%20aiuto.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EHo%20allegato%20i%20dati%20grezzi%20e%20i%20risultati%20del%20Minitab%20come%20riferimento.%20Minitab%20utilizza%20il%20modello%20Nested%20e%20ho%20provato%20i%20modelli%20Nested%20e%20Crossed%2C%20ma%20non%20riesco%20a%20ottenere%20gli%20stessi%20risultati.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-339663%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20I%20risultati%20GRR%20non%20corrispondono%20ai%20risultati%20Minitab%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-339663%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EE%20inserir%C3%B2%20una%20spina%20per%20i%20risultati%20corretti.%20Solo%20perch%C3%A9%20un'altra%20applicazione%20ha%20prodotto%20un%20risultato%20non%20significa%20che%20sia%20corretto%20o%20sia%20il%20modo%20ottimale%20per%20eseguire%20l'analisi.%20COME%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fuser%2Fviewprofilepage%2Fuser-id%2F4358%22%20target%3D%22_blank%22%3E%20%40statman%3C%2FA%3E%20chiede%2C%20senza%20sapere%20esattamente%20come%20%C3%A8%20stato%20creato%20il%20risultato%20in%20Minitab%2C%20il%20disegno%20sperimentale%20e%20le%20ipotesi%20che%20potresti%20testare%2C%20nonch%C3%A9%20ci%C3%B2%20che%20il%20cliente%20vorrebbe%20apprendere%20o%20concludere...%20non%20possiamo%20essere%20di%20grande%20aiuto.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-339623%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERi%3A%20I%20risultati%20GRR%20non%20corrispondono%20ai%20risultati%20Minitab%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-339623%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EPotresti%20postare%20i%20risultati%20di%20entrambe%20le%20analisi.%20Quanto%20sono%20diversi%3F%20Esistono%20molti%20modi%20per%20stimare%20i%20componenti%20dell'analisi%20di%20un%20sistema%20di%20misurazione.%20Il%20metodo%20della%20carta%20di%20controllo%20(vedi%20Wheeler)%2C%20ANOVA%2C%20e%20pu%C3%B2%20dipendere%20dal%20fatto%20che%20lo%20studio%20sia%20incrociato%2C%20nidificato%20o%20una%20combinazione.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
JKumar
Level I

GRR results not match with Minitab results

Hi, recently I received a GRR results file from a customer who used Minitab software to calculate it. But we cannot get the same result when we tried to use JMP14 software. Please give your suggestions on how to get the same results. Thanks

11 REPLIES 11
JKumar
Level I

Re: GRR results not match with Minitab results

Hi,

 

Thank you very much for the help.

JKumar
Level I

Re: GRR results not match with Minitab results

Hi Bill Worley,

 

Thank you very much for your great support.

Now the results are very close to Minitab results except Part -to-Part StdDev. This may be due to the difference in Variance components (REML & EMS) used.

 

Regards

Recommended Articles