cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-622112%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3EEl%20DOE%20personalizado%20no%20utiliza%20todo%20el%20rango%20de%20valores%20num%C3%A9ricos%20discretos%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-622112%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3E%3CP%3EEstoy%20intentando%20crear%20un%20DOE%20personalizado%20con%201%20factor%20continuo%20y%202%20factores%20num%C3%A9ricos%20discretos%20(3%20niveles).%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EUno%20de%20los%20factores%20num%C3%A9ricos%20discretos%20tiene%20los%20valores%201%2C%203%20y%205.%20Sin%20embargo%2C%20la%20tabla%20generada%20solo%20usa%20los%20valores%203%20y%205.%20Esto%20no%20me%20parece%20tener%20sentido%20desde%20el%20punto%20de%20vista%20del%20dise%C3%B1o%20de%20un%20experimento.%20Incluso%20cuando%20se%20cambia%20a%204%20factores%20de%20nivel%20(0%2C1%2C3%2C5)%2C%20solo%20se%20utilizan%203%20y%205.%20Consulte%20el%20archivo%20JMP%20para%20obtener%20m%C3%A1s%20detalles.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%C2%BFEs%20l%C3%B3gica%20esta%20elecci%C3%B3n%20o%20se%20trata%20de%20alg%C3%BAn%20tipo%20de%20error%3F%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EQuiz%C3%A1s%20de%20inter%C3%A9s%3B%20Estoy%20intentando%20utilizar%20un%20script%20de%20combinaciones%20no%20permitidas.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%3CSPAN%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%20lia-image-align-inline%22%20image-alt%3D%22mvanderaa1_0-1681374976340.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cspan%20class%3D%22lia-inline-image-display-wrapper%22%20image-alt%3D%22mvanderaa1_0-1681374976340.png%22%20style%3D%22width%3A%20400px%3B%22%3E%3Cimg%20src%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2Fimage%2Fserverpage%2Fimage-id%2F51921i3FB82640D43C994A%2Fimage-size%2Fmedium%3Fv%3Dv2%26amp%3Bpx%3D400%22%20role%3D%22button%22%20title%3D%22mvanderaa1_0-1681374976340.png%22%20alt%3D%22mvanderaa1_0-1681374976340.png%22%20%2F%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2FSPAN%3E%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%20%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-LABS%20id%3D%22lingo-labs-622112%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22UPDATE%22%3E%3CLINGO-LABEL%3EDise%C3%B1o%20de%20experimentos%3C%2FLINGO-LABEL%3E%3C%2FLINGO-LABS%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-622121%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20DOE%20personalizado%20no%20utiliza%20todo%20el%20rango%20de%20valores%20num%C3%A9ricos%20discretos%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-622121%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3E%C2%BFSon%20las%20combinaciones%20no%20permitidas%3FSi%20Nr_Foci%3D1%2C%20entonces%20(Pulse_energy*Nr_Foci)%20siempre%20es%20%26lt%3B60.%20Por%20lo%20tanto%2C%20Nr_Foci%20no%20es%20una%20opci%C3%B3n.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-622122%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20DOE%20personalizado%20no%20utiliza%20todo%20el%20rango%20de%20valores%20num%C3%A9ricos%20discretos%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-622122%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EEstoy%20respondiendo%20a%20mi%20propia%20publicaci%C3%B3n%20porque%20es%20posible%20que%20ya%20haya%20descubierto%20de%20d%C3%B3nde%20proviene%20este%20comportamiento.%20Estaba%20teniendo%20problemas%20para%20que%20las%20combinaciones%20no%20permitidas%20funcionaran%20al%20especificar%20la%20restricci%C3%B3n%20como%20un%20producto%20de%20los%20factores%20(es%20decir%2C%20X1*X2%26lt%3B60).%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAparentemente%20este%20script%20no%20funciona%20(algunas%20ejecuciones%20no%20cumplen%20esta%20condici%C3%B3n).%20Despu%C3%A9s%20de%20separar%20esta%20condici%C3%B3n%20en%20una%20combinaci%C3%B3n%20de%20restricciones%20m%C3%A1s%20simples%2C%20se%20resolvi%C3%B3%20el%20problema.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3ENr_Foci%20%3D%3D%203%20%26amp%3B%20Pulse_energy%20%26gt%3B%3D%2020%20%7C%20Nr_Foci%20%3D%3D%205%20%26amp%3B%20Pulse_energy%20%26gt%3B%3D%2012%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EEntonces%2C%20en%20cierto%20modo%2C%20mi%20problema%20est%C3%A1%20resuelto%2C%20pero%2C%20por%20supuesto%2C%20en%20otros%20casos%20no%20es%20tan%20f%C3%A1cil%20dividir%20dicha%20restricci%C3%B3n%20en%20m%C3%BAltiples%20restricciones.%20Por%20favor%2C%20aconseje%20qu%C3%A9%20hacer%20con%20este%20problema.%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3EAmablemente%20consejo%20qu%C3%A9%20hacer%20con%20esto%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3CP%3E%26nbsp%3B%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-622143%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20DOE%20personalizado%20no%20utiliza%20todo%20el%20rango%20de%20valores%20num%C3%A9ricos%20discretos%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-622143%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3Ewow%20vale%20tienes%20toda%20la%20razon.%20Escrib%C3%AD%20un%20filtro%20para%20las%20combinaciones%20permitidas%20en%20lugar%20de%20las%20no%20permitidas.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E%3CLINGO-SUB%20id%3D%22lingo-sub-622144%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3ERe%3A%20DOE%20personalizado%20no%20utiliza%20todo%20el%20rango%20de%20valores%20num%C3%A9ricos%20discretos%3C%2FLINGO-SUB%3E%3CLINGO-BODY%20id%3D%22lingo-body-622144%22%20slang%3D%22en-US%22%20mode%3D%22NONE%22%3E%3CP%3EEsto%20es%20bastante%20com%C3%BAn.%20Supongo%20que%20no%20es%20muy%20intuitivo%20definir%20las%20combinaciones%20no%20permitidas.%20Se%20siente%20m%C3%A1s%20natural%20definir%20las%20combinaciones%20permitidas%2C%20supongo.%20Es%20posible%20que%20desee%20agregar%20algo%20a%20la%3CA%20href%3D%22https%3A%2F%2Fcommunity.jmp.com%2Ft5%2FJMP-Wish-List%2Fidb-p%2Fjmp-wish-list%22%20target%3D%22_self%22%3E%20Lista%20de%20deseos%20de%20JMP%3C%2FA%3E%20sobre%20esto.%3C%2FP%3E%3C%2FLINGO-BODY%3E
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
mvanderaa1
Level IV

Custom DOE does not use the whole range of discrete numeric values

I am trying to create a custom DOE with 1 continuous factor and 2 discrete numeric factors (3 levels).

One of the discrete numeric factors has values 1, 3 and 5. The generated table only uses the values 3 and 5 however. This does not seem to make sense to me from a experiment design POV. Even when changing it to a 4 level factors (0,1,3,5) only 3 and 5 are used. See JMP file for details.

 

Is this choice logical, or is this some kind of bug?

 

Perhaps of interest; I am trying to use a Disallowed combinations script.

 

mvanderaa1_0-1681374976340.png

 

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions
MRB3855
Super User

Re: Custom DOE does not use the whole range of discrete numeric values

Is it the Disallowed Combinations?  If Nr_Foci=1, then (Pulse_energy*Nr_Foci) is always <60. Therefore, Nr_Foci is not an option.

View solution in original post

4 REPLIES 4
MRB3855
Super User

Re: Custom DOE does not use the whole range of discrete numeric values

Is it the Disallowed Combinations?  If Nr_Foci=1, then (Pulse_energy*Nr_Foci) is always <60. Therefore, Nr_Foci is not an option.

mvanderaa1
Level IV

Re: Custom DOE does not use the whole range of discrete numeric values

wow ok you are completely right. I wrote a filter for allowed combinations instead of disallowed ones.

Phil_Kay
Staff

Re: Custom DOE does not use the whole range of discrete numeric values

This is quite common. I guess it is not very intuitive to define the disallowed combinations. It feels more natural to define allowed combinations, I suppose. You might want to add something to the JMP Wish List about this.

mvanderaa1
Level IV

Re: Custom DOE does not use the whole range of discrete numeric values

I'm replying to my own post because I might have found already where this behavior comes from. I was having trouble getting the disallowed combinations to work by specifying the restriction as a product of the factors (i.e. X1*X2<60).

 

Apparently this script does not work (some runs do not fulfill this condition). After separating this condition to a combination of more simple restrictions the issue with  was resolved.

Nr_Foci == 3 & Pulse_energy >= 20 | Nr_Foci == 5 & Pulse_energy >= 12

 

So in a way my issue is solved, but of course in other cases it's not as easy to dissect such a restriction into multiple restrictions. Kindly advice what to do with this issue.

 

Kindly advice what to do with this

 

 

Recommended Articles