cancel
Showing results for 
Show  only  | Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
  • New to JMP? Join us Sept. 23-24 for the Early User Edition of Discovery Summit, tailor-made for new users. Register now for free!
  • Use World Cup data to build models, explore spatial relationships, and create informative visualizations in JMP. Register. July 17, 2 pm US Eastern Time.
  • Your voice matters! Tell us how you prefer to receive JMP updates, so we can tailor our communication to your needs. Take short survey.

Discussions

Solve problems, and share tips and tricks with other JMP users.
Choose Language Hide Translation Bar
albiruni81
Level II

Best method to do Failure Rate comparison

Hi,

 

What is the best method to do a failure rate comparison between two process. 

10 REPLIES 10

Re: Best method to do Failure Rate comparison

If you are using life time data for all of the items, then the items that failed for another reason are treated as censored data. (It is similar to competing cause analysis. You have some items with 'infant death' and others with a 'normal' failure mode.) They survived the failure mode of interest up to the time that they failed for another reason. These observations would be included in the Life Distribution analysis.

If you are using agregate count data of the total units failed at the endpoint in time (i.e., you don't observed items until the final moment, e.g., 3 months), then don't include these observations in the count of failures and delete them from the count unfailed. It is as if you started with a smaller sample. You can't count them as censored data in your Contingency analysis.

Recommended Articles