Thanks, it solved my problem ... View more

Hello Billy,   I am not using JMP pro, where could i find more tutorials about   K-fold cross-validation in JMP? i don't know how can i modify k-fold? ... View more

Hello Bill,   You have a good point there. How could i know when a system is over fiting and when it is not? Me neither i don't know how minitab does it. I said in previous email. I just selected the default parameters which are describe in the toturial. I agree with you in some times but the problem that i cannot fix that i have someparameters which are not evaluated by JMP like the width of cut or appears to be no significant. On the other hand, minitab puts this factor as significant. it is 180 degrees of difference.    Best regards ... View more

Hello Bill,  Yes, I modified my factors from categorical to continuous and see the results but I couldn’t find any differences in the surface response, see attached picture.  To your question, Minitab is working in full quadratic as default option, see attached picture too.   Best regards ... View more

Hello, thanks you for your tables and your feedback. I reviewed the tables and images that you uploaded and I have some technical difficulties to develop the experiments of RMS table. Simply because the tool which is noted by O cannot exceed more than 1. It is a restriction that we have. We developed a screening before and we stablished the operational parameters. Indeed, we developed all the experiments and we are looking to analysis the data and have some Pareto chart of standardized effect and make the ANOVA and see which parameters have most significant effect. I haven’t try JMP excel tool yet because I thought Fit model was powerful enough to make it. However, I still have some question. What did you mean with that “ The only reason to specify them as discrete is to FORCE certain levels into the design. If you truly want to do that, specify a higher-order model and/or use the Discrete Numeric option” How did you get the factor RS in the fit model option? Finally, retaking the las point, “Remember that JMP is designed to create the best designed experiment possible, not to match a specific table of runs. The table of runs may not be the best choice. The only way to have JMP "create" a table to match the Excel table is to use DOE > Classical > Full Factorial. Specify all of the factors and create the design. Then you must manually remove the unwanted combination. Note that the last piece must be manual because if you do not do that combination you are NOT running a full factorial design. That is why JMP does not build that design automatically. That is the purpose of the custom design: create designs for your specific situation rather than trying to force fit a design that is not really appropriate.” Actually, I did that at the beginning of this discussion and I found the results are not correct if I compared the results for example with Minitab; however, I remembered that you told me that I just match the DOE with the model. Best regards and have a nice day ... View more

Okay, please find attach the two data tables, one i made in Excel which i must replicate and evaluate using a stadistical sofware like JMP and the custom data table which was made by JMP and is wrong. I put 0 in thereplicate box and i think so it is in picture of the parameters that i posted before. As i said in previous emails, my goal is to replicate and evaluate the excel DOE. What can i do? I did several test and nonestly, i could find something which can solve my issue in JMP. And yes you right. There is no option for full factorial in custome design but i did it because i inverted the order of my factorials in order to use the restriction DOE evaluation   Besr regards and have a nice week   ... View more

Even on the option of full factorial in custom design, i got duplicates values. Could you tell me why it is? ... View more

Updated information: Even for three factors, i have some repeat parameters. Is there a way to block repeat values? Uploaded picture 3 factors ... View more

Updated information: Even for three factors, i have some repeat parameters. Is there a way to block repeat values? Uploaded picture 3 factors ... View more

Hello, I read the tutorial and i made a  custom design with a disallowed combination and honestly, i don't know why it gave me a strange table with some duplicate values and sometimes with some misses values i tested the combination of too and width of cut and it works well, then i tried tool, width of cut and cuttining speed and was okay too: however, when i did the 4 together, it starts the disaster and found some duplicated values and some missed values. Could you tell me why, I post all my parameters and the table. could you help me please?   Best regards DOE Parameters ... View more

Updated information: related to the previous email, i splited my DOE in two full factorial, one DOE with a width of cut of 1 and the other one with 4.3, i did this in order to fit my response with the DOE model and got the following result for a width of cut 1 but it doesn't work because i am also interested in that response First Result 2 Result ... View more

How can i get my DOE like i want? let me explain better i am working with machinering parameters so i have three tools, two of them are caplable to cut in tu conditions example 1 and 5 but one tool is a special case so it can only cut at 1, so that was the reason i just delate the part of the 5 from the full factorial for only one tool. How can i develop a DOE with this caracteristics?   Best regards Desired DOE ... View more

It did a full factorial  but I cut one part because one parameter was useless in my experiment. It is more like a customized DOE (My DOE is full factorial 3x2x3x3=54 test but I did 45.) and it was created in JMP. My doubt is in the section of Fit model and more specifically in the part of construct model effect, see picture. The option by default is response surface but apparently the result is a different from Minitab so I started to play and I found that mixture response surface is the closest result one, my question is why is that happing? What are the differences between both?. Do you have an email to send you my data? Fit Model Dialog ... View more